| |

The Marksman Who Refused to Shoot George WashingtonBy Ernest B. Furgurson | American History| Drafts | 9 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post For months after Brandywine, Ferguson managed to fend off surgeons who wanted to amputate his shattered right arm. But the arm was useless thereafter, so he laboriously taught himself to wield sword, pistol and pen with his left hand. While he was out of action, his sharpshooters scattered into other units, but rejoined him after he recovered. Early in October 1778, General Henry Clinton, who had replaced General Howe, dispatched the Scottish captain on a commando raid against one of the hideouts from which American privateers were harassing and capturing British ships. Subscribe Today
With 400 men aboard eight or 10 vessels, Ferguson sailed from New York to strike at Little Egg Harbor, on the New Jersey coast just above modern Atlantic City. They destroyed 10 vessels, wrecked warehouses and shipyards, and burned the homes of known patriots. Days later, Ferguson heard from deserters that Pulaski’s Legion, sent by Washington to catch him, was camped 11 miles away. In the deep of night, he took 250 troops in rowboats to surprise the Americans. They bayoneted and killed 50, capturing only five, before Pulaski arrived with his dragoons and drove the attackers away. The Americans would complain that their men were massacred. “It being a night attack, little quarter could of course be given,” Ferguson reported; only two of his own troops were killed, three wounded and one missing. The nature of the war was rapidly changing. Chivalry and ferocity were in serious contention on both sides, and within Patrick Ferguson. After a series of successful missions along the coast and up the Hudson Valley, in late 1779 Ferguson was at last promoted to major, in the 71st Highlanders. Then, when General Clinton mounted an all-out offensive to crush resistance in the rebellious South, he temporarily boosted Ferguson to lieutenant colonel, leading an independent force of 500 rangers. Skirmishing ahead of the army between Savannah and Charleston, he accidentally collided with a friendly force and in the darkness, a British bayonet sliced through his good left arm. Undaunted, for three weeks he rode with his reins in his teeth. Charleston fell to the British in May 1780 after three months of siege operations, during which Ferguson’s Rangers struck inland to cut off American lines of supply. From Charleston, General Charles Cornwallis intended to subdue the backcountry and then sweep north through the Carolinas and Virginia. The British strategists believed that the backcountry was full of loyalists, and Cornwallis sent Ferguson and the arrogant, merciless cavalryman Banastre Tarleton into the hills to recruit them. This brought on a series of bloody clashes, American Tories vs. American patriots, often family against family. “It was a civil war,” wrote the historian Christopher Ward, “and it was marked by bitterness, violence, and malevolence such as only civil wars can engender.” Ferguson tried first to make friends, to convince these rustics that he came “not to make war on women and children, but to relieve their distresses.” That summer, he succeeded in collecting and drilling several thousand loyalists. But when soft words did not work, he resorted to the sword, even the hangman’s noose. As word of his men’s plundering spread, local and state militia leaders raised regiments of vengeful partisans, including “over-mountain men” from beyond the Blue Ridge, skilled at shooting squirrels and fighting Indians. Ferguson was operating out of touch, beyond Cornwallis’ western flank, while the main British army marched north. His reputation spread among the backwoodsmen as they gathered in the mountains. Though slim and scholarly in appearance, in combat he was inspirational. He wore over his uniform a bold black-and-white plaid duster to be seen by his troops, and signaled them with a silver whistle to be heard in the chaos of battle. But Ferguson’s zealotry carried him into a mistake that made sure there would be no mercy if he ever fell into patriot hands. As the backwoodsmen gathered in the hills, he sent a prisoner with a message to their commander. He told them to “desist from their opposition to the British arms,” or else “he would march his army over the mountains, hang their leaders, and lay their country waste with fire and sword.” This arrogance further infuriated the patriots, who vowed to hunt him down. Pages: 1 2 3 4Tags: American History, American Revolutionary War, Military Technology
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
9 Comments to “The Marksman Who Refused to Shoot George Washington”
What a pity,that honor isn’t contagious.
By E.T. on Feb 20, 2009 at 8:29 pm
It was a Gentleman’s war, for sure. For, let’s be honest, we were all British, and I would feel uncomfortable at that time, being of Scottish blood myself, shooting someone from the colonies. And Patrick Ferguson from Scotland, whose father or uncles likely served in the Jacobite Rebellion, did his duty but had no love of King George and the Hanoverians for what they did to Kingdom of Scotland.
By Keith Patrick Larsen on Feb 21, 2009 at 6:23 am
“Captain Patrick Ferguson, a 33-year-old Scotsman reputed to be the finest shot in the British army, commanded the British marksmen, who were equipped with fast-firing, breech-loading rifles of Ferguson’s own design” Hmmm, I thought that rifles were invented somewhere around the late 1800s. Anything before that was smoothbore.
By Paul on Mar 25, 2009 at 2:52 pm
did anyone else here read the entire article?
By Andrew on Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 pm
The rifle, invented in the 15th cent., is a firearm with a grooved, or rifled, bore that imparts a spinning motion to the bullet, giving it greater accuracy. (The principle of rifling the inner surface of the barrel is applied also to artillery.) Rifles first came into widespread practical use in the E United States. Because of its slow rate of fire and its manufacturing cost, the rifle remained relatively unused as a military weapon in Europe. Until the middle of the 19th cent. the musket was the standard small arm.
http://www.ask.com/bar?q=when+was+the+rifle+invented&page=1&qsrc=2417&ab=4&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.factmonster.com%2Fce6%2Fhistory%2FA0861137.html
By p on Mar 27, 2009 at 12:17 am
yeah right. SOURCE PLEASE. This is what citations are for, so you can’t just tell a story and have everyone believe you without providing any proof.
George Washington, Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams all grew hemp. Today they would be arrested and thrown in prison for that.
source: tinyurl.com/1mn
By Phil E. Drifter on Apr 1, 2009 at 8:00 am
Hemp! That is just one of our freedoms (rights) that have been taken from (we the people) us. As you said, they all grew it and all were great leaders, worked for thier money, not steal from the
people and make a living being a politician. Everyone needs to really study our Constitution and quit listening ( and believing) to how our so called leaders are interpreting it.
Remember, God gave us our rights, the Constitution was written to insure our God given rights were protected in this country !!!
I can go on.
God Bless us all
By Greg on Apr 14, 2009 at 2:51 pm
Those great leaders you quote Phil/Greg also kept slaves, sodmoized children and had incestuous/extra-marital relationships… lovely what a bit of back ground reading on these “leaders of men” shows up heh!
And I think I can live without the drug abuse to live in a land without slavery thank you so very much.
Oh and as neither of you bothered to give sources I’ll withold mine too, happy hunting.
Greg… there is no god and even if there was she’s a black big mama living down in Mexico pointing her finger at you and laughing -”God gave us our rights, the Constitution was written to insure our God given rights were protected in this country” – yeah, right!
By Milander on Apr 28, 2009 at 3:33 am
People love to tear down the founders these days and it seems like they think that their generation is so above reproach. Your exaggeration of the founders sins is more propaganda than fact. I would bet that you have some skeletons in your closet also.
By Jim on Jun 5, 2009 at 12:22 pm