<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Engineer Who Greased the P-38 Lightning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/the-engineer-who-greased-the-p-38-lightning.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-engineer-who-greased-the-p-38-lightning.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus DeFore</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-engineer-who-greased-the-p-38-lightning.htm#comment-779406</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus DeFore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684275#comment-779406</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone. Keep the feedback coming. I&#039;ve never worked on or  have flown a P38. I&#039;m a Vietnam Veteran who took 2 tours on board the USS Towers DDG9. I subscribed to this e-magazine because I believe the P38 Lightning is one of the most beautiful &amp; effective planes of WWII. I worked as an electronics technician for 50 years.  So I understand developement &amp; sometimes failure which usually is a good learning tool to eventual success. It&#039;s great to read the stories on how the P38 developed into the plane it is today.  Your feedback makes it all that more interesting.
Thank You all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone. Keep the feedback coming. I&#039;ve never worked on or  have flown a P38. I&#039;m a Vietnam Veteran who took 2 tours on board the USS Towers DDG9. I subscribed to this e-magazine because I believe the P38 Lightning is one of the most beautiful &amp; effective planes of WWII. I worked as an electronics technician for 50 years.  So I understand developement &amp; sometimes failure which usually is a good learning tool to eventual success. It&#039;s great to read the stories on how the P38 developed into the plane it is today.  Your feedback makes it all that more interesting.<br />
Thank You all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Zweifel</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-engineer-who-greased-the-p-38-lightning.htm#comment-779310</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Zweifel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684275#comment-779310</guid>
		<description>May I also make another addendum regarding who should also receive credit for solving the airfoil compressability problem.

John Stack was only one of the aeronautical engineers attempting to determine super-sonic standing-wave formation at the new wind tunnel. The late Lt Col Bruce Bauer USAF Ret was in addition present along with Kelley Johnson... as remedying this challenge was a criticality-one issue....

A pilot-controlled inflatable boot mod was fitted as a stop-gap fix upon the ventral inner side of each wing-spar... which caused dispersion of the supersonic standing waves thereby maintaining lift plus significantly reducing induced drag....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I also make another addendum regarding who should also receive credit for solving the airfoil compressability problem.</p>
<p>John Stack was only one of the aeronautical engineers attempting to determine super-sonic standing-wave formation at the new wind tunnel. The late Lt Col Bruce Bauer USAF Ret was in addition present along with Kelley Johnson&#8230; as remedying this challenge was a criticality-one issue&#8230;.</p>
<p>A pilot-controlled inflatable boot mod was fitted as a stop-gap fix upon the ventral inner side of each wing-spar&#8230; which caused dispersion of the supersonic standing waves thereby maintaining lift plus significantly reducing induced drag&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Zweifel</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-engineer-who-greased-the-p-38-lightning.htm#comment-779307</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Zweifel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684275#comment-779307</guid>
		<description>May I take this opportunity to unequivocally state that the Lightning never had a stainless steel fuselage or wing spars. The AC utilized mostly duraluminum as it had a higher tensile strength than most aluminum alloys.

The technology in question did not exist in the forties and even if it had the mfg facilities, those wouldn&#039;t have been up to the capability of mass production.

The XB-70 Valkyrie had stainless sheet-steel, however it was determined that repairing ss was exceedingly difficult plus being time-consuming. Therefore that particular alloy was deemed to be not at all practicable....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I take this opportunity to unequivocally state that the Lightning never had a stainless steel fuselage or wing spars. The AC utilized mostly duraluminum as it had a higher tensile strength than most aluminum alloys.</p>
<p>The technology in question did not exist in the forties and even if it had the mfg facilities, those wouldn&#039;t have been up to the capability of mass production.</p>
<p>The XB-70 Valkyrie had stainless sheet-steel, however it was determined that repairing ss was exceedingly difficult plus being time-consuming. Therefore that particular alloy was deemed to be not at all practicable&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
