<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 9 Greatest Supreme Court Justices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gillis</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices.htm#comment-245916</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gillis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681192#comment-245916</guid>
		<description>With all due respect to Prof. Turley (whose commentaries on TV I find very interesting and insightful), I really fail to understand how he could include a figure such as Charles Evan Hughes on the list. While a notable figure (and the only person to be appointed twice to the Supreme Court), I can think of nothing in his career or jurisprudence that sets him apart as one of the truly great Justices. In my mind Cardozo, Stone and Frankfurter made more solid contributions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect to Prof. Turley (whose commentaries on TV I find very interesting and insightful), I really fail to understand how he could include a figure such as Charles Evan Hughes on the list. While a notable figure (and the only person to be appointed twice to the Supreme Court), I can think of nothing in his career or jurisprudence that sets him apart as one of the truly great Justices. In my mind Cardozo, Stone and Frankfurter made more solid contributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeraldS</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices.htm#comment-119160</link>
		<dc:creator>GeraldS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681192#comment-119160</guid>
		<description>The article also appears in the October 2009 issue, Emily. If you have trouble finding a copy, you can order one from HistoryNet&#039;s online store, http://www.historynetshop.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article also appears in the October 2009 issue, Emily. If you have trouble finding a copy, you can order one from HistoryNet&#039;s online store, <a href="http://www.historynetshop.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.historynetshop.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Schlater</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices.htm#comment-119094</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Schlater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681192#comment-119094</guid>
		<description>Is this article also in American History magazine, or is it available online only?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this article also in American History magazine, or is it available online only?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cordova</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices.htm#comment-103332</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cordova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681192#comment-103332</guid>
		<description>Just a quick correction: the profile of John Marshall says &quot;&#039;A hush falls upon us even now as we listen to his words,&#039; Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote more than two centuries later.&quot; Cardozo wrote one, not two, centuries after Marshall: </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick correction: the profile of John Marshall says &#034;&#039;A hush falls upon us even now as we listen to his words,&#039; Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote more than two centuries later.&#034; Cardozo wrote one, not two, centuries after Marshall:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Vandewinckel</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices.htm#comment-95598</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Vandewinckel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681192#comment-95598</guid>
		<description>In an 1820 letter to Thomas Richie, Thomas Jefferson wrote this about Congress &quot;it is not from this branch of government we have the most to fear.&quot;  He went on to express the real focus of his concern in writing &quot;the judiciary of the government is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working underground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric.&quot;

Starting with John Marshall - chief disciple of America&#039;s first statist, Alexander Hamilton - and with few exceptions following, Jonathan Turley&#039;s list of &quot;the 9 greatest Supreme Court Justices of all time&quot; is validation of Jefferson fear.

When it comes to the judiciary &quot;bold thinkers&quot; go to the bottom of the list.  Can we please have the old editors back?

Thank you for your time,
Chris Vandewinckel - Baltimore, MD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an 1820 letter to Thomas Richie, Thomas Jefferson wrote this about Congress &#034;it is not from this branch of government we have the most to fear.&#034;  He went on to express the real focus of his concern in writing &#034;the judiciary of the government is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working underground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric.&#034;</p>
<p>Starting with John Marshall &#8211; chief disciple of America&#039;s first statist, Alexander Hamilton &#8211; and with few exceptions following, Jonathan Turley&#039;s list of &#034;the 9 greatest Supreme Court Justices of all time&#034; is validation of Jefferson fear.</p>
<p>When it comes to the judiciary &#034;bold thinkers&#034; go to the bottom of the list.  Can we please have the old editors back?</p>
<p>Thank you for your time,<br />
Chris Vandewinckel &#8211; Baltimore, MD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Tramonte</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-9-greatest-supreme-court-justices.htm#comment-94646</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Tramonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681192#comment-94646</guid>
		<description>I found this to be an interesting and informative article.  I think I&#039;ll do more reading on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this to be an interesting and informative article.  I think I&#039;ll do more reading on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

