| |

Stumbling in Sherman’s PathBy Noah Andre Trudeau | Civil War Times | 4 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post When P.G.T. Beauregard was not ineffectively carping at John B. Hood, he seemingly managed to be anywhere except where he was most needed. Once Beauregard was finally in a position to influence events, his determination to preserve military assets at all costs doomed Savannah. Subscribe Today
Hardee, Taylor and then Bragg limited their participation to narrowly focused defensive measures, leaving larger strategic issues hanging. Wheeler never looked beyond the enemy in his immediate front, and though he may have banged up Kilpatrick’s cavalry from time to time, his men never posed a serious threat to Sherman’s timetables. Southern soldiers who found themselves in Sherman’s path fought hard, but most of the opposition was limtited to hit-and-run attacks that the Federals could easily counter. Approximately 2,300 Confederates were killed, wounded or captured in the efforts to defend Georgia. Sherman’s surge through the state was not unstoppable. If Wheeler’s mounted units had been concentrated against the Federal army’s logistical tail, with intelligent deployment of the militia to cover those actions, the Union columns would have been considerably impeded and Sherman would have reached Savannah in a much weakened condition. Had Hardee issued orders to defend the city to the fullest, risking his small garrison in the process, it would have taken Sherman much longer to capture the city. All of which might have delayed his departure into the Carolinas well into March. What the badly hemorrhaging Confederacy might have done with the extra time, however, is another question altogether.
Tags: American Civil War, Historical Figures
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
4 Comments to “Stumbling in Sherman’s Path”
Very interesting article. It helps put to rest the false impression that Sherman’s march bound to succeed. Instead, the inability of the Confederates to carry through a plan lost them the chances they did have to stop the march.
By WestPointer on Sep 4, 2008 at 5:02 pm
For all ‘intents and purposes’ the War was after Vicksburg and Chattanooga fell. Davis’ attempt to rally demoralized and haggarded troops to the so-called “cause”—a LOST “cause”. These efforts resulted in more needless deaths and physical destruction. The net gain—–NOTHING! Just more suffering!!
By Berdell Hardy on Sep 10, 2008 at 9:04 pm
One of the major criticisms reveal many of the Confederate states—mainly Georgia—maintain their “States Rights” mentality throughout the conflict eventhough the need for a Central Authority-type leadership blared LOUDLY!
Oftentimes they went their own way,trying to keep one-eye on the enemy and the other on their own self-interests.
By Berdell Hardy on Sep 10, 2008 at 9:21 pm
An interesting view on the March to the Sea. Does make one wonder about what might have happened if the Confederate Army of Tennessee had stayed in Georgia and contested the march. Again a good point in that the March to the Sea was not a forgone conclusion and one that guaranteed success.
By Daniel Gidick on Jan 2, 2009 at 9:42 pm