| |

Spirit of New OrleansBy John C. McManus | Military History | 3 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post
Subscribe Today
The Battle of New Orleans was a slaughter. British casualties that day numbered more than 2,000, while the Americans lost just 70 men, 13 of who were killed. Burial details from both sides worked together for days to dispose of the dead. The wounded were carried to nearby homes that had been turned into makeshift hospitals. The level of ghastliness and suffering was reportedly beyond imagination. One British captain recalled hearing the piteous cries of his wounded soldiers and seeing “a basket nearly full of legs severed from these fine fellows.” The British army retreated from the field, boarded ships and left. Ironically, this climactic battle was fought after American and British negotiators had concluded a peace treaty in Ghent, Belgium, on Christmas Eve 1814. But on that fateful day in early January 1815, no one in New Orleans knew anything about a treaty. The Americans knew only that their country had been invaded, and they must fight. They proved they could defeat some of the world’s best troops fighting on behalf of the world’s strongest nation. They also proved the lethal efficacy of applied and concentrated firepower, a blend of technology, policy and tactics that would eventually prove the cornerstone of the American way of war. For further reading, John McManus recommends: The Battle of New Orleans: Andrew Jackson and America’s First Military Victory, by Robert V. Remini, and Struggle for the Gulf Borderlands: The Creek War and the Battle of New Orleans, 1812–1815, by Frank Owsley, Jr. Pages: 1 2 3 4Tags: 17th - 18th Century, 19th Century, Historical Conflicts, Historical Figures
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
3 Comments to “Spirit of New Orleans”
i think that the author did a good job on writing this article on the British war
By Machalla on Sep 20, 2008 at 9:53 pm
I really like history alot and now i am being part of this latest history magazine website. I have come to know about the history of the various aspects World,Civil War and many others to name a few.
I like this site as it has all starting from history of UK,US,France,Poland and more.Now i know why i honestly dont know much about Hisotry i have not been surfing many such sites based on true History.This website will make me a real encyclopedia
knowing all about history.I am interested in this one.
BPSSEKHON
By BPSSEKHON on Mar 25, 2009 at 2:58 am
Although the Chesapeake prong of the British offensive initially succeeded in Bladensburg and DC, it is imprudent and inaccurate to entirley omit the fact that the British offensive was entirely repulsed at Baltimore. In fact, the battle of Baltimore in effect ended the war before the first shots were fired in New Orleans, unbeknown to those fighting in NO. Further, it is quite possible that the British humiliation at Baltimore caused them to throw caution to the wind and imprudently attack the entrenched Americans at New Orleans.
I know the aim of the story is to show the importance and excitement of the Battle of NO, but it is historically improper to omit reference to the related and strategically more important battle of Baltimore (perhaps because it has a lower body count?)!
By Plodicus on Oct 24, 2009 at 4:21 pm