Comments on: Shaka: Zulu Chieftain http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shaka-zulu-chieftain From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:24:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: delon http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-788898 delon Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:30:20 +0000 #comment-788898 just please get notice that your an african to and every one isnt the same not unless your twins and yes shaka zulu was one of great kings he made his weapons by hisself. signature, Delon Boyd just please get notice that your an african to and every one isnt the same not unless your twins and yes shaka zulu was one of great kings he made his weapons by hisself.

signature, Delon Boyd

]]> By: Lisa http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-788232 Lisa Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:21:31 +0000 #comment-788232 I enjoyed the movie very much but have a very difficult time believing the accounts as told by europeans alone. History books usually favor the victor which was in this case, the invading europeans. Europeans love to retell other people's history to favor themselves. Heck, they even have some who honestly believe they arrived in South Africa thousands of years before the blacks. Talk about a group of crazies....and pretty damn arrogant as well. I would love to hear stories about Shaka as recounted by Zulu griots/storytellers. I'd bet they'd have a completely different account from the Anglo invaders. I enjoyed the movie very much but have a very difficult time believing the accounts as told by europeans alone. History books usually favor the victor which was in this case, the invading europeans. Europeans love to retell other people's history to favor themselves.
Heck, they even have some who honestly believe they arrived in South Africa thousands of years before the blacks. Talk about a group of crazies….and pretty damn arrogant as well.
I would love to hear stories about Shaka as recounted by Zulu griots/storytellers. I'd bet they'd have a completely different account from the Anglo invaders.

]]> By: Zach http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-787083 Zach Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:42:31 +0000 #comment-787083 I find it interesting that a religious argument breaks out over a comment directed towards Shaka Zulu I find it interesting that a religious argument breaks out over a comment directed towards Shaka Zulu

]]> By: Haftanin Tarihi Karakteri | As Days Go By, http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-786525 Haftanin Tarihi Karakteri | As Days Go By, Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:33:37 +0000 #comment-786525 [...] halledilmis (Guney Afrika Cumhuriyetine giris)Ilgilenenler Shaka’nin ozet hayatini buradan okuyabilir. [...] [...] halledilmis (Guney Afrika Cumhuriyetine giris)Ilgilenenler Shaka'nin ozet hayatini buradan okuyabilir. [...]

]]> By: Krishna Kumar Panjaje http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-785081 Krishna Kumar Panjaje Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:56:46 +0000 #comment-785081 Mr. Ian, I wholeheartedly agree with you. Mr. Ian,
I wholeheartedly agree with you.

]]> By: ian http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-784365 ian Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:26:44 +0000 #comment-784365 sorry ill have to disagree with you akor genghis khan is the greatest warrior of all time. sorry ill have to disagree with you akor genghis khan is the greatest warrior of all time.

]]> By: Justin http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-783235 Justin Thu, 01 Dec 2011 03:35:09 +0000 #comment-783235 Skip through the religious texts? You've been through the Old Testament prophecies as well as the New testament accounts of Jesus? And citing all the evidence I have heard and read over the years will be difficult. The next best thing to the Bible would be Roman and Jewish texts under the Emperor Claudius. This should point you in the right direction. http://www.holyfear.net/pdf/bruce/claudius_bruce.pdf Skip through the religious texts? You've been through the Old Testament prophecies as well as the New testament accounts of Jesus? And citing all the evidence I have heard and read over the years will be difficult. The next best thing to the Bible would be Roman and Jewish texts under the Emperor Claudius. This should point you in the right direction.
http://www.holyfear.net/pdf/bruce/claudius_bruce.pdf

]]> By: Beverly http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-782926 Beverly Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:54:35 +0000 #comment-782926 actually, what i said was that i found that obscure fact surprising. i haven't yet concluded whether or not I believe Jesus actually existed. so it would be helpful if you could cite all this historical evidence of which you speak. you can skip the religious texts, i've already been through them. i've also looked through the 'pagan' texts that look oddly similar to the Jesus story but preceded it. actually, what i said was that i found that obscure fact surprising. i haven't yet concluded whether or not I believe Jesus actually existed. so it would be helpful if you could cite all this historical evidence of which you speak.

you can skip the religious texts, i've already been through them. i've also looked through the 'pagan' texts that look oddly similar to the Jesus story but preceded it.

]]> By: Justin http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-782921 Justin Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:20:00 +0000 #comment-782921 and i find that hard to believe since he caused the roman empire and the jewish leaders so much trouble and i find that hard to believe since he caused the roman empire and the jewish leaders so much trouble

]]> By: Justin http://www.historynet.com/shaka-zulu-chieftain.htm#comment-782920 Justin Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:18:48 +0000 #comment-782920 The religious texts are historical. They are backed by as much if not more historical evidence than any other document from the time period. This is compelling evidence for his existence and that is without mentioning the 'religious documents' harmonies and consistencies despite the time spans and vast distances between the authors of the accounts of Jesus. So, to dismiss the existence of Jesus simply because most documents of his actions are considered by yourself as 'religious' is illogical. The religious texts are historical. They are backed by as much if not more historical evidence than any other document from the time period. This is compelling evidence for his existence and that is without mentioning the 'religious documents' harmonies and consistencies despite the time spans and vast distances between the authors of the accounts of Jesus. So, to dismiss the existence of Jesus simply because most documents of his actions are considered by yourself as 'religious' is illogical.

]]>