<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fearsome, Flawed Tiger I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/september-2008-the-fearsome-flawed-tiger-i.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/september-2008-the-fearsome-flawed-tiger-i.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=september-2008-the-fearsome-flawed-tiger-i</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/september-2008-the-fearsome-flawed-tiger-i.htm#comment-342866</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13680806#comment-342866</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t the Sherman Firefly&#039;s armor......it was the QF 17 pound gun that the Brits put in.Firing APDS(Armor Piercing Descarding Sabot)rounds it could penetrate the Tiger&#039;s frontal armor at 2000 meters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#039;t the Sherman Firefly&#039;s armor&#8230;&#8230;it was the QF 17 pound gun that the Brits put in.Firing APDS(Armor Piercing Descarding Sabot)rounds it could penetrate the Tiger&#039;s frontal armor at 2000 meters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Reese</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/september-2008-the-fearsome-flawed-tiger-i.htm#comment-291224</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13680806#comment-291224</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  Wonder where the Sherman Firefly obtained all of that armor?  The range it can be killed by the Tiger is half that of a normal Sherman and Cromwell tank.  Wonder why?  It had the same armor as any Sherman except the M4A3E2 Jumbo.

IS-2 out-ranged the Tiger I but could the crews hit anything at those ranges?  The Germans had very good optics.  The Soviets did not.  The IS-2 had 28 rounds of main gun ammunition, which took a lot longer to load, being a separate shell and cartridge. Half of these, 14 rounds, would be armor piercing.   The Tiger I had 92 rounds with at least half Armor Piercing.  The Germans found the IS-2 a tough nut and of course the Soviets had many more IS-2 then the Germans had Tigers.  Still - this chart seems flawed..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  Wonder where the Sherman Firefly obtained all of that armor?  The range it can be killed by the Tiger is half that of a normal Sherman and Cromwell tank.  Wonder why?  It had the same armor as any Sherman except the M4A3E2 Jumbo.</p>
<p>IS-2 out-ranged the Tiger I but could the crews hit anything at those ranges?  The Germans had very good optics.  The Soviets did not.  The IS-2 had 28 rounds of main gun ammunition, which took a lot longer to load, being a separate shell and cartridge. Half of these, 14 rounds, would be armor piercing.   The Tiger I had 92 rounds with at least half Armor Piercing.  The Germans found the IS-2 a tough nut and of course the Soviets had many more IS-2 then the Germans had Tigers.  Still &#8211; this chart seems flawed..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

