![]() |
||
![]() |
||
2 Responses to “The Fearsome, Flawed Tiger I”Leave a Reply
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
|
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2012 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
Hmmm. Wonder where the Sherman Firefly obtained all of that armor? The range it can be killed by the Tiger is half that of a normal Sherman and Cromwell tank. Wonder why? It had the same armor as any Sherman except the M4A3E2 Jumbo.
IS-2 out-ranged the Tiger I but could the crews hit anything at those ranges? The Germans had very good optics. The Soviets did not. The IS-2 had 28 rounds of main gun ammunition, which took a lot longer to load, being a separate shell and cartridge. Half of these, 14 rounds, would be armor piercing. The Tiger I had 92 rounds with at least half Armor Piercing. The Germans found the IS-2 a tough nut and of course the Soviets had many more IS-2 then the Germans had Tigers. Still – this chart seems flawed..
It wasn't the Sherman Firefly's armor……it was the QF 17 pound gun that the Brits put in.Firing APDS(Armor Piercing Descarding Sabot)rounds it could penetrate the Tiger's frontal armor at 2000 meters.