<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scopes Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=scopes-trial</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blogs: Is it Illegal to Read ‘The Satanic Verses?’ &#124; auicon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-787413</link>
		<dc:creator>Best in Blogs: Is it Illegal to Read ‘The Satanic Verses?’ &#124; auicon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-787413</guid>
		<description>[...] evolution in schools and teaching creationism, we do. It comes up like clockwork, despite the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925. Oklahoma is the latest state to breach the subject. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] evolution in schools and teaching creationism, we do. It comes up like clockwork, despite the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925. Oklahoma is the latest state to breach the subject. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blogs: Is it Illegal to Read ‘The Satanic Verses?’ &#124; Augusta News &#124; Augusta GA Local News</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-787388</link>
		<dc:creator>Best in Blogs: Is it Illegal to Read ‘The Satanic Verses?’ &#124; Augusta News &#124; Augusta GA Local News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-787388</guid>
		<description>[...] evolution in schools and teaching creationism, we do. It comes up like clockwork, despite the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925. Oklahoma is the latest state to breach the subject. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] evolution in schools and teaching creationism, we do. It comes up like clockwork, despite the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925. Oklahoma is the latest state to breach the subject. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russell</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-782025</link>
		<dc:creator>russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-782025</guid>
		<description>these are some delicious comments bro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these are some delicious comments bro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logic</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-782020</link>
		<dc:creator>logic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-782020</guid>
		<description>To all of you church believers do you not know that ancient civilizations flourished before the bible says god made Adam and eve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all of you church believers do you not know that ancient civilizations flourished before the bible says god made Adam and eve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-778708</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-778708</guid>
		<description>look up &#039;irreducible complexity&#039; on google. The issue is not so much that the human eye is *different* from an animal&#039;s as it is that THE EYE, animal or human, is too irreducibly complex to exist at all by evolutionary standards..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look up &#039;irreducible complexity&#039; on google. The issue is not so much that the human eye is *different* from an animal&#039;s as it is that THE EYE, animal or human, is too irreducibly complex to exist at all by evolutionary standards..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-512238</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-512238</guid>
		<description>Retarted? Really? how can you possibly be saying that other people are retarded for not believing in God, when you can&#039;t even spell the word correctly? 

And it is unbelievable to me the arguments that people are making against evolution here. &quot;look at the human eye,&quot; &quot;we never have any characteristics of any animal,&quot; and &quot;people like you are dumb because people think that we came from monkeys.&quot; You are seriously making yourself look dumb. I&#039;m not even saying that I completely believe in evolution, but at least I can see the hundreds of similarities between humans and animals.  

Ultimately none of you were there when the world was created, so how can you possibly say that either side is true for sure? Even the people who wrote the Bible weren&#039;t there. So how does anyone really know? It is all theory, evolution and creationism alike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retarted? Really? how can you possibly be saying that other people are retarded for not believing in God, when you can&#039;t even spell the word correctly? </p>
<p>And it is unbelievable to me the arguments that people are making against evolution here. &#034;look at the human eye,&#034; &#034;we never have any characteristics of any animal,&#034; and &#034;people like you are dumb because people think that we came from monkeys.&#034; You are seriously making yourself look dumb. I&#039;m not even saying that I completely believe in evolution, but at least I can see the hundreds of similarities between humans and animals.  </p>
<p>Ultimately none of you were there when the world was created, so how can you possibly say that either side is true for sure? Even the people who wrote the Bible weren&#039;t there. So how does anyone really know? It is all theory, evolution and creationism alike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-509271</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-509271</guid>
		<description>this is very true people like that r jus retarted and they dnt believe in god so thts there problem and they can take it up with the man upstairs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is very true people like that r jus retarted and they dnt believe in god so thts there problem and they can take it up with the man upstairs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logical Tolerance</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-508894</link>
		<dc:creator>Logical Tolerance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-508894</guid>
		<description>*sigh* This is why people need to learn about evolution. Even if you don&#039;t believe in it you need to understand it to provide a valid argument against it. It&#039;s uneducated people of faith that make the rest of religious followers look bad. I&#039;m sorry but &quot;The Bible says so,&quot; is not a good enough answer. It&#039;s a cop out that Christian Fundamentalist use to avoid having to actually give a reasonable answer. The theory of evolution does not imply that we are monkeys. Is it that hard to google? Try reading...you might learn something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh* This is why people need to learn about evolution. Even if you don&#039;t believe in it you need to understand it to provide a valid argument against it. It&#039;s uneducated people of faith that make the rest of religious followers look bad. I&#039;m sorry but &#034;The Bible says so,&#034; is not a good enough answer. It&#039;s a cop out that Christian Fundamentalist use to avoid having to actually give a reasonable answer. The theory of evolution does not imply that we are monkeys. Is it that hard to google? Try reading&#8230;you might learn something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logical Tolerance</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-508877</link>
		<dc:creator>Logical Tolerance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-508877</guid>
		<description>Carl, 

Have you ever taken the time to actually read &quot;On the Origin of Species&quot; by Charles Darwin. Nowhere in his work does he state that we evolved from monkeys, nor does he even discuss human evolution. He merely alludes to the possibility of his theory of natural selection as a theory that could shed light onto our own origins as a species. I would also encourage you to look at the fossil record of early hominids. I do not have a problem with any follower of any religion; everyone is entitled to their own beliefs, but I cannot stand it when one bashes something of which they have absolutely no knowledge. Before you can intelligently debate a topic and successfully prove your point, you have to know BOTH sides of the argument. Learning about evolution is not wrong, it gives you the opportunity to logically argue against it instead of making outlandish comments that make you look like an uneducated fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, </p>
<p>Have you ever taken the time to actually read &#034;On the Origin of Species&#034; by Charles Darwin. Nowhere in his work does he state that we evolved from monkeys, nor does he even discuss human evolution. He merely alludes to the possibility of his theory of natural selection as a theory that could shed light onto our own origins as a species. I would also encourage you to look at the fossil record of early hominids. I do not have a problem with any follower of any religion; everyone is entitled to their own beliefs, but I cannot stand it when one bashes something of which they have absolutely no knowledge. Before you can intelligently debate a topic and successfully prove your point, you have to know BOTH sides of the argument. Learning about evolution is not wrong, it gives you the opportunity to logically argue against it instead of making outlandish comments that make you look like an uneducated fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/scopes-trial.htm#comment-504329</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 05:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-504329</guid>
		<description>the human eye is intricately designed. and so is the animal eye... havent you ever dissected a cow&#039;s eye? i think it would be good for you because IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS A HUMAN&#039;S EXCEPT BIGGER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the human eye is intricately designed. and so is the animal eye&#8230; havent you ever dissected a cow&#039;s eye? i think it would be good for you because IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS A HUMAN&#039;S EXCEPT BIGGER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

