<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sand Creek Massacre: The Real Villains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:40:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-942897</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-942897</guid>
		<description>Your summary of this \history\ article is exactly right. Here is the problem with people like this: they pick and choose their facts. It is partially because they just want to promote a viewpoint, and partially because they are just lazy. When you look at the entire context of the situation, including, for example, the later actions of Edward Wynkoop after Sand Creek, you will see a man deeply disturbed by what had happened, and I honestly think he never really recovered from it. George Bent said in the 1890s that Wynkoop was the best friend the Arapahoes and Cheyenne ever had. You also see the reaction of the Arapahoes and Cheyenne themselves. They did not think Wynkoop was to blame. He was their agent for four years after Sand Creek until resigning in very public disgust. Go read the man&#039;s resignation letter. So, subsequent conduct is ignored by writers like this. Also, consider some of the inane points above. Wynkoop was a show off and opportunist because he wore a hat blocking Black Kettle&#039;s face? He is smoking? Come on. Look at similar pictures from the time period man. You are using your cultural sensitivity of today when looking at this stuff. You have to umderstand how this would be viewed in their time period. Again, totally leaving out broader context and just making s*** up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your summary of this \history\ article is exactly right. Here is the problem with people like this: they pick and choose their facts. It is partially because they just want to promote a viewpoint, and partially because they are just lazy. When you look at the entire context of the situation, including, for example, the later actions of Edward Wynkoop after Sand Creek, you will see a man deeply disturbed by what had happened, and I honestly think he never really recovered from it. George Bent said in the 1890s that Wynkoop was the best friend the Arapahoes and Cheyenne ever had. You also see the reaction of the Arapahoes and Cheyenne themselves. They did not think Wynkoop was to blame. He was their agent for four years after Sand Creek until resigning in very public disgust. Go read the man&#039;s resignation letter. So, subsequent conduct is ignored by writers like this. Also, consider some of the inane points above. Wynkoop was a show off and opportunist because he wore a hat blocking Black Kettle&#039;s face? He is smoking? Come on. Look at similar pictures from the time period man. You are using your cultural sensitivity of today when looking at this stuff. You have to umderstand how this would be viewed in their time period. Again, totally leaving out broader context and just making s*** up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-859795</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-859795</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that this entire article on the \real villains of Sand Creek\ is filled with personal opinion at the expense of cold fact. Surely this is one of the biggest mistakes any \historian\ could make, and it further seems to be aimed at whitewashing the deeds of some (Chivington) while blackening the names of others. that&#039;s not history. And then to cast aspersions on your critics, such as implying that they may have been descendants of your \villains\ among other things, is frankly a childish, vindictive diversionary tactic. Mr Neeley, how can you honestly call yourself an historian? doesn&#039;t the word stick in your throat? it should</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that this entire article on the \real villains of Sand Creek\ is filled with personal opinion at the expense of cold fact. Surely this is one of the biggest mistakes any \historian\ could make, and it further seems to be aimed at whitewashing the deeds of some (Chivington) while blackening the names of others. that&#039;s not history. And then to cast aspersions on your critics, such as implying that they may have been descendants of your \villains\ among other things, is frankly a childish, vindictive diversionary tactic. Mr Neeley, how can you honestly call yourself an historian? doesn&#039;t the word stick in your throat? it should</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-810272</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-810272</guid>
		<description>General Nelson A. Miles was one of the officers who had to deal with
the war that was the aftermath of Sand Creek, and he did not mince
any words about what he thought of Chivington and his so-called
volunteers.  He said that Sand Creek was &quot;perhaps the foulest and
most unjustifiable crime in the annals of America&quot; and that Sand
Creek was the cause of most of the subsequent hostilities between
the U.S. and the Cheyennes.  General O.O. Howard expressed 
similar sentiments and called Sand Creek an &quot;act of infamous 
barbarity&quot;.  These remarks are in their memoirs if anyone cares to 
read them.  Even Chivington&#039;s superior, General Curtis tried mto have
Chivington court-martialed because of his slaughter of women and
children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>General Nelson A. Miles was one of the officers who had to deal with<br />
the war that was the aftermath of Sand Creek, and he did not mince<br />
any words about what he thought of Chivington and his so-called<br />
volunteers.  He said that Sand Creek was &#034;perhaps the foulest and<br />
most unjustifiable crime in the annals of America&#034; and that Sand<br />
Creek was the cause of most of the subsequent hostilities between<br />
the U.S. and the Cheyennes.  General O.O. Howard expressed<br />
similar sentiments and called Sand Creek an &#034;act of infamous<br />
barbarity&#034;.  These remarks are in their memoirs if anyone cares to<br />
read them.  Even Chivington&#039;s superior, General Curtis tried mto have<br />
Chivington court-martialed because of his slaughter of women and<br />
children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana R. Younger</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-810143</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana R. Younger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-810143</guid>
		<description>Native United Methodist missionaries welcome Act of Repentance
By Elliott Wright &#124; May 1, 2012 
[United Methodist News Service – Tampa, Fla.] Missionary Donna Chaat Pewo is praying that United Methodist “repentance” for past injustice to Native Americans and other indigenous people will open new doors for her ministry among Arapaho and Cheyenne children in western Oklahoma.

“It’s a start,” she said in an interview in Tampa where, on the night of April 27, the United Methodist Church officially asked God’s forgiveness for all manner of past violence and neglect of native people. The value of the action was also welcomed by Gary Locklear, another missionary who is a member of the Lumbee Tribe in North Carolina and a delegate to General Conference 2012.

The service was prompted in part by the 1864 massacre of 168 unarmed Cheyenne and Arapaho near Sand Creek, Colo. Sand Creek stands as a symbol of a violent past to Methodists because John Chivington, who led the raid, was an ordained Methodist pastor and local army officer. His superior who approved the raid was also Methodist.

“An Act of Repentance Toward Healing Relationships with Indigenous People” was one of the high moments of the 2012 General Conference, an event held every four years to conduct church business.
‘The Wounds Are Still Open’

Pewo, a member of the Comanche tribe who works in Clinton and El Reno, Okla., said that Sand Creek casts a long shadow, still causing Cheyenne and Arapaho to be cautious about contact with Methodists.

“The wounds are still open and the people feel that the church has neglected them,” she said. “The Act of Repentance gives us a chance to show the love of Jesus Christ.” She is hopeful that the denomination will take steps to ensure that news of the action reaches Indian Country.

Pewo, a local pastor, was in Tampa to be commissioned as a Church and Community Worker, a category of missionary service, by the denomination’s mission agency, the United Methodist Board of Global Ministries.

George Tinker, who teaches at United Methodist-related Iliff School of Theology in Denver, gave the sermon for the service of repentance. A member of the Osage Nation and a Lutheran clergyman, Tinker said he deeply respected the United Methodists for starting the process of repentance, which he said is complex and dangerous.

Why? “Repentance is not a one-time incident,” he stated. “Repentance must be repeated, every day. Jesus said to keep on repenting. Repentance must become a way of life.”

Locklear, the missionary in North Carolina, said he was excited by the possibilities opened by the Act of Repentance.

“We as a denomination are being brought together in healing as a result. Tonight, while the service is going on,” he said, “many native people in North Carolina will gather to celebrate this milestone, and not only Methodists, but people from other denominations who desperately seek healing. They are saying, ‘Thank you, United Methodist Church.’”

Locklear, a Church and Community Worker and Home Missioner, organized a group of some 30 Lumbees to attend the Act of Repentance. The service is seen as the launch of an ongoing process of repentance and contribution for the abuse of native peoples worldwide; it also promotes a spirit of healing.

Josephine Deere, a member of the Muscogee Nation, Global Ministries’ director and General Conference delegate from the Oklahoma Indian Missionary Conference, said many Native Americans are wondering whether United Methodists will follow through with the Act of Repentance.

“It is time for the church to look at the gifts and graces of Native Americans,” she said in an interview. “Right now, we are not shown in presentations of the church, such as in videos, and we have a lot to offer.”

The Tampa event was the third act of repentance of the church, said the Rev. Stephen Sidorak, top staff executive of the United Methodist Commission on Christian Unity and Interreligious Concerns, which planned the service of repentance. The previous occasions, at the General Conferences of 2000 and 2004, related to Methodist treatment of African Americans.

Haunted by Sand Creek

What happened at Sand Creek has for decades haunted American Methodism. Chivington was never disciplined or even chastised by the church. The 1996 General Conference in Denver expressed its regret and issued an apology for Chivington’s actions. It also passed a resolution supporting U.S. government restitutions to the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes. These actions were considered tepid and insignificant by Native American United Methodists.

In 2008, the General Conference voted to contribute $50,000 to the National Park Service toward building the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site Research and Learning Center, near the massacre site in Colorado. Sand Creek was only one incident in what Tinker called “500 years of Christian conquest” in the Americas, involving the displacement and slaughter of native peoples.

The 2008 General Conference also authorized the Commission on Christian Unity and Interreligious Concerns to prepare resources to promote healing between the church and indigenous people and to plan an Act of Repentance for the 2012 General Conference. Various petitions, expected to be adopted in Tampa, call for ongoing actions toward repentance and healing.

An increased awareness of Native American history and contemporary culture was visible at the Tampa conference. The geographic region has a spotty history concerning indigenous people. It was one of the areas from which Maskoke — which are known to non-Native Americans as Muscogee (“Creek”) — people were forced to leave to resettle in Oklahoma following the 1830 Indian Removal Act. At the opening of the conference, artist Marcus Briggs-Cloud, a Maskoke, performed a native ceremony of consecration of the space in which plenary sessions were held.

The church makes a difference

Global Ministries assisted in bringing several Native Americans to Tampa for the Act of Repentance, among them Skyler Corbett, a young man of the Klamath Paute who is a member of Wilshire United Methodist Church in Portland, Ore.

In an interview, Corbett recalled how he was bullied and taunted when he was younger because he was Native American. He also felt he was considered “different” in the churches he attended, until he found Wilshire Church.

“I joined because in an open session, the members sat in a circle, an open circle, and I told what it means to be Native American, what our history means.” He felt accepted.

‘Power of forgiveness’

Pewo worked in the Clinton/El Reno area for several years before seeking missionary status. She traces her call to ministry to an experience in 1999 when she faced two possible paths, and Jesus called to her from one, saying, “Follow me.” She was guided, she says, to “bring God’s gospel of love, mercy, and justice” to the children in the communities of the Cheyenne and Arapaho.

She believes the “power of forgiveness can undo the past damage the church had done to Native people.”

Pewo is especially hopeful that the church can bring a message of love and concern to children and youth. She works at the Clinton Indian Community Center with 35 youngsters ages 3 to 14.

“Many are from broken homes and experience discrimination in public school,” she says. “The church is their place of refuge. They have taken ownership of the church, not only looking after our building but also looking out for one another.

“Our presence in the community is vital,” says Pewo. “I extend an olive branch, trying to heal the wounds.”

 – Wright is a long-time reporter on United Methodist news. Christie R. House, editor of New World Outlook magazine, contributed to this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Native United Methodist missionaries welcome Act of Repentance<br />
By Elliott Wright | May 1, 2012<br />
[United Methodist News Service – Tampa, Fla.] Missionary Donna Chaat Pewo is praying that United Methodist “repentance” for past injustice to Native Americans and other indigenous people will open new doors for her ministry among Arapaho and Cheyenne children in western Oklahoma.</p>
<p>“It’s a start,” she said in an interview in Tampa where, on the night of April 27, the United Methodist Church officially asked God’s forgiveness for all manner of past violence and neglect of native people. The value of the action was also welcomed by Gary Locklear, another missionary who is a member of the Lumbee Tribe in North Carolina and a delegate to General Conference 2012.</p>
<p>The service was prompted in part by the 1864 massacre of 168 unarmed Cheyenne and Arapaho near Sand Creek, Colo. Sand Creek stands as a symbol of a violent past to Methodists because John Chivington, who led the raid, was an ordained Methodist pastor and local army officer. His superior who approved the raid was also Methodist.</p>
<p>“An Act of Repentance Toward Healing Relationships with Indigenous People” was one of the high moments of the 2012 General Conference, an event held every four years to conduct church business.<br />
‘The Wounds Are Still Open’</p>
<p>Pewo, a member of the Comanche tribe who works in Clinton and El Reno, Okla., said that Sand Creek casts a long shadow, still causing Cheyenne and Arapaho to be cautious about contact with Methodists.</p>
<p>“The wounds are still open and the people feel that the church has neglected them,” she said. “The Act of Repentance gives us a chance to show the love of Jesus Christ.” She is hopeful that the denomination will take steps to ensure that news of the action reaches Indian Country.</p>
<p>Pewo, a local pastor, was in Tampa to be commissioned as a Church and Community Worker, a category of missionary service, by the denomination’s mission agency, the United Methodist Board of Global Ministries.</p>
<p>George Tinker, who teaches at United Methodist-related Iliff School of Theology in Denver, gave the sermon for the service of repentance. A member of the Osage Nation and a Lutheran clergyman, Tinker said he deeply respected the United Methodists for starting the process of repentance, which he said is complex and dangerous.</p>
<p>Why? “Repentance is not a one-time incident,” he stated. “Repentance must be repeated, every day. Jesus said to keep on repenting. Repentance must become a way of life.”</p>
<p>Locklear, the missionary in North Carolina, said he was excited by the possibilities opened by the Act of Repentance.</p>
<p>“We as a denomination are being brought together in healing as a result. Tonight, while the service is going on,” he said, “many native people in North Carolina will gather to celebrate this milestone, and not only Methodists, but people from other denominations who desperately seek healing. They are saying, ‘Thank you, United Methodist Church.’”</p>
<p>Locklear, a Church and Community Worker and Home Missioner, organized a group of some 30 Lumbees to attend the Act of Repentance. The service is seen as the launch of an ongoing process of repentance and contribution for the abuse of native peoples worldwide; it also promotes a spirit of healing.</p>
<p>Josephine Deere, a member of the Muscogee Nation, Global Ministries’ director and General Conference delegate from the Oklahoma Indian Missionary Conference, said many Native Americans are wondering whether United Methodists will follow through with the Act of Repentance.</p>
<p>“It is time for the church to look at the gifts and graces of Native Americans,” she said in an interview. “Right now, we are not shown in presentations of the church, such as in videos, and we have a lot to offer.”</p>
<p>The Tampa event was the third act of repentance of the church, said the Rev. Stephen Sidorak, top staff executive of the United Methodist Commission on Christian Unity and Interreligious Concerns, which planned the service of repentance. The previous occasions, at the General Conferences of 2000 and 2004, related to Methodist treatment of African Americans.</p>
<p>Haunted by Sand Creek</p>
<p>What happened at Sand Creek has for decades haunted American Methodism. Chivington was never disciplined or even chastised by the church. The 1996 General Conference in Denver expressed its regret and issued an apology for Chivington’s actions. It also passed a resolution supporting U.S. government restitutions to the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes. These actions were considered tepid and insignificant by Native American United Methodists.</p>
<p>In 2008, the General Conference voted to contribute $50,000 to the National Park Service toward building the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site Research and Learning Center, near the massacre site in Colorado. Sand Creek was only one incident in what Tinker called “500 years of Christian conquest” in the Americas, involving the displacement and slaughter of native peoples.</p>
<p>The 2008 General Conference also authorized the Commission on Christian Unity and Interreligious Concerns to prepare resources to promote healing between the church and indigenous people and to plan an Act of Repentance for the 2012 General Conference. Various petitions, expected to be adopted in Tampa, call for ongoing actions toward repentance and healing.</p>
<p>An increased awareness of Native American history and contemporary culture was visible at the Tampa conference. The geographic region has a spotty history concerning indigenous people. It was one of the areas from which Maskoke — which are known to non-Native Americans as Muscogee (“Creek”) — people were forced to leave to resettle in Oklahoma following the 1830 Indian Removal Act. At the opening of the conference, artist Marcus Briggs-Cloud, a Maskoke, performed a native ceremony of consecration of the space in which plenary sessions were held.</p>
<p>The church makes a difference</p>
<p>Global Ministries assisted in bringing several Native Americans to Tampa for the Act of Repentance, among them Skyler Corbett, a young man of the Klamath Paute who is a member of Wilshire United Methodist Church in Portland, Ore.</p>
<p>In an interview, Corbett recalled how he was bullied and taunted when he was younger because he was Native American. He also felt he was considered “different” in the churches he attended, until he found Wilshire Church.</p>
<p>“I joined because in an open session, the members sat in a circle, an open circle, and I told what it means to be Native American, what our history means.” He felt accepted.</p>
<p>‘Power of forgiveness’</p>
<p>Pewo worked in the Clinton/El Reno area for several years before seeking missionary status. She traces her call to ministry to an experience in 1999 when she faced two possible paths, and Jesus called to her from one, saying, “Follow me.” She was guided, she says, to “bring God’s gospel of love, mercy, and justice” to the children in the communities of the Cheyenne and Arapaho.</p>
<p>She believes the “power of forgiveness can undo the past damage the church had done to Native people.”</p>
<p>Pewo is especially hopeful that the church can bring a message of love and concern to children and youth. She works at the Clinton Indian Community Center with 35 youngsters ages 3 to 14.</p>
<p>“Many are from broken homes and experience discrimination in public school,” she says. “The church is their place of refuge. They have taken ownership of the church, not only looking after our building but also looking out for one another.</p>
<p>“Our presence in the community is vital,” says Pewo. “I extend an olive branch, trying to heal the wounds.”</p>
<p> – Wright is a long-time reporter on United Methodist news. Christie R. House, editor of New World Outlook magazine, contributed to this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to make history out of fiction &#171; Intriguing Faces and Places from Colorado&#039;s Past</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-785956</link>
		<dc:creator>How to make history out of fiction &#171; Intriguing Faces and Places from Colorado&#039;s Past</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-785956</guid>
		<description>[...] in his article “Sand Creek Massacre: The Real Villains,” Published Online: June 12, 2006. (http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm). In this article, Michno again uses the Cutler quotes as real quotes from real Silas Soule [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in his article “Sand Creek Massacre: The Real Villains,” Published Online: June 12, 2006. (<a href="http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm</a>). In this article, Michno again uses the Cutler quotes as real quotes from real Silas Soule [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-785263</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-785263</guid>
		<description>Lieutenant James Olney of the First Colorado Cavalry said in a 
sworn deposition that three women and five children who had
surrendered and been taken prisoner were shot down and killed
by Lieutenant Harry Richmond as they begged for mercy.  Even
Major Anthony reproted that he saw a two year old child used for
target practice and killed by three of Chivington&#039;s men.  So much
for the claim that the killing of women and children at Sand Creek
was accidental and the result of the confusion of battle, or that
women were shot only in self defense because they were shooting
at the soldiers.  I think the most reliable estimate of the number
killed at Sand Creek was 163--53 men and 110 women and children.
Only 7 were taken prisoner, and those against orders.

In the second attack on (what was left of) Black Kettle&#039;s band, 
a recent estimate puts the number killed at 58--40 men, 12 women,
and 6 children with 53 (all women and children) taken prisoner.
Custer&#039;s (and Sheridan&#039;s) orders were to kill only men but take
women and children prisoner to be used as &quot;bargaining chips&quot; in
l;ater negotiations with the natives.  Custer had been following a
Kiowa war party and apparently mistook Black Kettle&#039;s village
for the home village of the Kiowas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieutenant James Olney of the First Colorado Cavalry said in a<br />
sworn deposition that three women and five children who had<br />
surrendered and been taken prisoner were shot down and killed<br />
by Lieutenant Harry Richmond as they begged for mercy.  Even<br />
Major Anthony reproted that he saw a two year old child used for<br />
target practice and killed by three of Chivington&#039;s men.  So much<br />
for the claim that the killing of women and children at Sand Creek<br />
was accidental and the result of the confusion of battle, or that<br />
women were shot only in self defense because they were shooting<br />
at the soldiers.  I think the most reliable estimate of the number<br />
killed at Sand Creek was 163&#8211;53 men and 110 women and children.<br />
Only 7 were taken prisoner, and those against orders.</p>
<p>In the second attack on (what was left of) Black Kettle&#039;s band,<br />
a recent estimate puts the number killed at 58&#8211;40 men, 12 women,<br />
and 6 children with 53 (all women and children) taken prisoner.<br />
Custer&#039;s (and Sheridan&#039;s) orders were to kill only men but take<br />
women and children prisoner to be used as &#034;bargaining chips&#034; in<br />
l;ater negotiations with the natives.  Custer had been following a<br />
Kiowa war party and apparently mistook Black Kettle&#039;s village<br />
for the home village of the Kiowas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nolon wood</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-785216</link>
		<dc:creator>nolon wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 06:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-785216</guid>
		<description>yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nolon wood</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-785215</link>
		<dc:creator>nolon wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 06:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-785215</guid>
		<description>What does sittin bull,the  N.P.A and some childhood chief that played baseball have to do with sand creek? The native American people were lied to and took advantage of my people were forced ona reservation nowhere near their their homelands it&#039;s basically a consentration camp with no razer wire.killing children is butal and my people are just as guilty. i like reading everbodies comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does sittin bull,the  N.P.A and some childhood chief that played baseball have to do with sand creek? The native American people were lied to and took advantage of my people were forced ona reservation nowhere near their their homelands it&#039;s basically a consentration camp with no razer wire.killing children is butal and my people are just as guilty. i like reading everbodies comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-784033</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-784033</guid>
		<description>There are sworn statements by in\idnividuals present at Sand Creek
that women and children were shot down as they tried to surrender, or in some cases, after they had surrendered and were in captivity.  
See the statements made by Lt. James Olney, 1st Colorado Cavelry.

The army policy was to attack Indian villages,;
women and children were often killed in
the confusion, but therte is much evidence that
at Sand Creek they were shot down deliberately,
in some cases, after they had already surrendered.  Usually,
the Army took scores of prisoners in such attacks (Ash Hollow,Whitestone Hill, Washita, McClellan Creek).  Chivington
bragged that he took no prisoners of any age or sex (not true,
the First Colorado troops, most of whom opposed the massacre,
took 2 women and 5 children prisoner and protected them), and
once said his policy in dealing with Indians was to &quot;kill them all,
little and big, because nits make lice&quot;.  Even if the Cheyennes were
hostile, there is no excuse for the murder of women and children captives, nor for the sexual mutilation of females.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are sworn statements by in\idnividuals present at Sand Creek<br />
that women and children were shot down as they tried to surrender, or in some cases, after they had surrendered and were in captivity.<br />
See the statements made by Lt. James Olney, 1st Colorado Cavelry.</p>
<p>The army policy was to attack Indian villages,;<br />
women and children were often killed in<br />
the confusion, but therte is much evidence that<br />
at Sand Creek they were shot down deliberately,<br />
in some cases, after they had already surrendered.  Usually,<br />
the Army took scores of prisoners in such attacks (Ash Hollow,Whitestone Hill, Washita, McClellan Creek).  Chivington<br />
bragged that he took no prisoners of any age or sex (not true,<br />
the First Colorado troops, most of whom opposed the massacre,<br />
took 2 women and 5 children prisoner and protected them), and<br />
once said his policy in dealing with Indians was to &#034;kill them all,<br />
little and big, because nits make lice&#034;.  Even if the Cheyennes were<br />
hostile, there is no excuse for the murder of women and children captives, nor for the sexual mutilation of females.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabie jacks</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/sand-creek-massacre-the-real-villains.htm#comment-756630</link>
		<dc:creator>gabie jacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-756630</guid>
		<description>americans were so un fair now and then the native americans got kicked off there land too many times and every time the whites said they would not be bother well that didnt last long for any of the times they always got booted some eles for either gold good hunting land becaues whites and indians wern&#039;t getting along for some many resons that only benifted the whites? talk about unfair right now a days every thing is about money we need a whole new govenment system to change the way things are now i get ou cant change the past but you always have the time and oppertunity to change the e would future and the way were going now nothngs going to change not now not ever. that riht there is a little pice of my mind.  but i dont think anybody could express the way they would feel after they got done reading or hearing about this tragic date in americas history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>americans were so un fair now and then the native americans got kicked off there land too many times and every time the whites said they would not be bother well that didnt last long for any of the times they always got booted some eles for either gold good hunting land becaues whites and indians wern&#039;t getting along for some many resons that only benifted the whites? talk about unfair right now a days every thing is about money we need a whole new govenment system to change the way things are now i get ou cant change the past but you always have the time and oppertunity to change the e would future and the way were going now nothngs going to change not now not ever. that riht there is a little pice of my mind.  but i dont think anybody could express the way they would feel after they got done reading or hearing about this tragic date in americas history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
