<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rome&#8217;s Craftiest General: Scipio Africanus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/romes-craftiest-general-scipio-africanus.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/romes-craftiest-general-scipio-africanus.htm</link>
	<description>From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:31:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/romes-craftiest-general-scipio-africanus.htm/comment-page-1#comment-139742</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-139742</guid>
		<description>this is obly about one problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is obly about one problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/romes-craftiest-general-scipio-africanus.htm/comment-page-1#comment-58230</link>
		<dc:creator>jason taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58230</guid>
		<description>&quot;There’s something I can’t figure after reading the article and another account of Zama: If Scipio went out of his way to cultivate the Numidians just to have superiority in cavalry for that flanking option on which so much depended, did he just leave it to chance that his cavalry would return on time ? Could he have instructed at least his roman cavalry commander that his job was to turn and flank after seeing the enemy horse off the field ?&quot;

There are several answers to that question. One is simply that war is largely about luck and an experienced commander knows that. Another is that the cavalry&#039;s job was in fact not to turn and flank. Rome never had a cavalry tradition and the best that could be hoped for was to chase away the enemy horse. Scipio could count on his infantry to win against enemy infantry one way or another but the enemy cavalry was a wild card that Romans had long found difficult. The Numidians returning and blindsiding the Cartheginians was in fact a bonus. Furthermore for him to tell the Numidian prince how to command cavalry or that his primary mission was to help Romans would go quite a ways against cultivating him.  We do not in fact know what he told him along that line but it would have likly had all the awkward compromises involved in coalition warfare. Scipios Numidians in fact likly thought of Hannibals Numidians as their primary enemy and thought of the punic wars as a background for their local power struggles. Furthermore cavalry is notoriously hard to control and there are many instances of it charging to far.
I suspect that Scipio thought of his cavalry primarily as a counter to enemy cavalry which had been so deadly earlier in the war and relied primarily on his infantry which he was familiar with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There’s something I can’t figure after reading the article and another account of Zama: If Scipio went out of his way to cultivate the Numidians just to have superiority in cavalry for that flanking option on which so much depended, did he just leave it to chance that his cavalry would return on time ? Could he have instructed at least his roman cavalry commander that his job was to turn and flank after seeing the enemy horse off the field ?&#8221;</p>
<p>There are several answers to that question. One is simply that war is largely about luck and an experienced commander knows that. Another is that the cavalry&#8217;s job was in fact not to turn and flank. Rome never had a cavalry tradition and the best that could be hoped for was to chase away the enemy horse. Scipio could count on his infantry to win against enemy infantry one way or another but the enemy cavalry was a wild card that Romans had long found difficult. The Numidians returning and blindsiding the Cartheginians was in fact a bonus. Furthermore for him to tell the Numidian prince how to command cavalry or that his primary mission was to help Romans would go quite a ways against cultivating him.  We do not in fact know what he told him along that line but it would have likly had all the awkward compromises involved in coalition warfare. Scipios Numidians in fact likly thought of Hannibals Numidians as their primary enemy and thought of the punic wars as a background for their local power struggles. Furthermore cavalry is notoriously hard to control and there are many instances of it charging to far.<br />
I suspect that Scipio thought of his cavalry primarily as a counter to enemy cavalry which had been so deadly earlier in the war and relied primarily on his infantry which he was familiar with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/romes-craftiest-general-scipio-africanus.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6721</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6721</guid>
		<description>Once cavalry had been &#039;fired&#039; at the enemy, commanders in the ancient world had great trouble getting them back for another shot. This would particularly apply to Rome where the cavalry were likely to be auxiliaries from some distant province and not Romans. The normal event saw cavalry charge through their enemy and then, in its rear, lay into the enemy&#039;s baggage train for booty. William the Conqueror could work cavalry so as to regroup them for repeated charges but he was unusually talented, but his cavalry were knights with a stake in the outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once cavalry had been &#8216;fired&#8217; at the enemy, commanders in the ancient world had great trouble getting them back for another shot. This would particularly apply to Rome where the cavalry were likely to be auxiliaries from some distant province and not Romans. The normal event saw cavalry charge through their enemy and then, in its rear, lay into the enemy&#8217;s baggage train for booty. William the Conqueror could work cavalry so as to regroup them for repeated charges but he was unusually talented, but his cavalry were knights with a stake in the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WongHoongHooi</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/romes-craftiest-general-scipio-africanus.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>WongHoongHooi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s something I can&#039;t figure after reading the article and another account of Zama: If Scipio went out of his way to cultivate the Numidians just to have superiority in cavalry for that flanking option on which so much depended, did he just leave it to chance that his cavalry would return on time ? Could he have instructed at least his roman cavalry commander that his job was to turn and flank after seeing the enemy horse off the field ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something I can&#8217;t figure after reading the article and another account of Zama: If Scipio went out of his way to cultivate the Numidians just to have superiority in cavalry for that flanking option on which so much depended, did he just leave it to chance that his cavalry would return on time ? Could he have instructed at least his roman cavalry commander that his job was to turn and flank after seeing the enemy horse off the field ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
