Comments on: Roman-Persian Wars: Battle of Carrhae http://www.historynet.com/roman-persian-wars-battle-of-carrhae.htm From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:44:02 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Meeting in the Middle « Passing Strangeness http://www.historynet.com/roman-persian-wars-battle-of-carrhae.htm/comment-page-1#comment-72555 Meeting in the Middle « Passing Strangeness Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:50:29 +0000 #comment-72555 [...] up against Rome directly and also bordered on Chinese vassal starts on its opposite side. After the Battle of Carrhae, something like 10,000 Roman soldiers were captured by the Parthians, and Parthian policy was to [...] [...] up against Rome directly and also bordered on Chinese vassal starts on its opposite side. After the Battle of Carrhae, something like 10,000 Roman soldiers were captured by the Parthians, and Parthian policy was to [...]

]]> By: sillan http://www.historynet.com/roman-persian-wars-battle-of-carrhae.htm/comment-page-1#comment-20649 sillan Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:54:17 +0000 #comment-20649 acording to Roman historins.....in the battle of Carrhae: Parthian had just 9,000 soldiers(most hoursman archers) and 1000 cataphracts but Romans had more than 40,000 soldiers..(35,000 legionaries,4,000 cavalry,4,000 light infantry) resault was decisive Parthian victory casualties and losses of Parthians was reported very light........ but Romans had more than 20,000 dead and more than 4,000 wounded more than 10,000 roman was captured by Parthians and removed to Iranshahr(same,Persia). acording to Roman historins…..in the battle of Carrhae:

Parthian had just 9,000 soldiers(most hoursman archers) and 1000 cataphracts
but Romans had more than 40,000 soldiers..(35,000 legionaries,4,000 cavalry,4,000 light infantry)

resault was decisive Parthian victory

casualties and losses of Parthians was reported very light…….. but Romans had more than 20,000 dead and more than 4,000 wounded

more than 10,000 roman was captured by Parthians and removed to Iranshahr(same,Persia).

]]> By: juan carlos quispe gallegos http://www.historynet.com/roman-persian-wars-battle-of-carrhae.htm/comment-page-1#comment-19382 juan carlos quispe gallegos Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:35:40 +0000 #comment-19382 good afternoon. marcus licinius crasus,was old and when the battle came,he tinkh the partians was not rival for the roman army,even his son publius when he atacked the partians,at first realize the partians were fleeing,but the gods,were not with crasus and when his son was killed,marcus crasus lost his confidence,because he love his son to much,even seeing his son head in hands of the partians,cry and his soldiers,cry too..........the roman republic lost the triunvirus crasus ,and that was the began the roman civil wars. thanks. good afternoon.

marcus licinius crasus,was old and when the battle came,he tinkh the partians was not rival for the roman army,even his son publius when he atacked the partians,at first realize the partians were fleeing,but the gods,were not with crasus and when his son was killed,marcus crasus lost his confidence,because he love his son to much,even seeing his son head in hands of the partians,cry and his soldiers,cry too……….the roman republic lost the triunvirus crasus ,and that was the began the roman civil wars.
thanks.

]]> By: Historyfan http://www.historynet.com/roman-persian-wars-battle-of-carrhae.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3839 Historyfan Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:54:20 +0000 #comment-3839 You forgot that after the battle of carrhae romans have beaten parthians 4 times with Cassius Longinus and Ventidius You forgot that after the battle of carrhae romans have beaten parthians 4 times with Cassius Longinus and Ventidius

]]>