<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Robert E. Lee Doom Himself at Gettysburg?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sweet Taste of the National Parks</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-781503</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sweet Taste of the National Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-781503</guid>
		<description>[...] war&#8217;s best general, Robert E. Lee, lost the entire war with this single bad decision. He regretted it till his dying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] war&#039;s best general, Robert E. Lee, lost the entire war with this single bad decision. He regretted it till his dying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald P Parrish</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-630928</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald P Parrish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 03:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-630928</guid>
		<description>Lee was CIC. The fault rests clearly with him! He knew he was without his eye&#039;s ( Stewart ) Lee should have tarried and took Longstreets advice to move on DC compelling the Union forces to follow where Lee would have clearly commanded the field as the defender always has the advantage. Lee could have choosen the location, time and manner of defence as the Union would have been forced to attack and not defend. Lee had no one to blame but Lee. Semper Fidelis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee was CIC. The fault rests clearly with him! He knew he was without his eye&#039;s ( Stewart ) Lee should have tarried and took Longstreets advice to move on DC compelling the Union forces to follow where Lee would have clearly commanded the field as the defender always has the advantage. Lee could have choosen the location, time and manner of defence as the Union would have been forced to attack and not defend. Lee had no one to blame but Lee. Semper Fidelis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-514437</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-514437</guid>
		<description>i agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-376223</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-376223</guid>
		<description>You appear to strongly dislike spelling, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You appear to strongly dislike spelling, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Ann Loves You</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-290673</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Ann Loves You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-290673</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m related to this guy! be jealous (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#039;m related to this guy! be jealous (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-279906</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-279906</guid>
		<description>i hate the confederats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate the confederats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-103928</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-103928</guid>
		<description>Gen. Lee was at fault at Gettysburg...he contributed 85% at least to this confederate loss...Lee heeded Ewell and did not press him, but instead &quot;did not&quot; heed Longstreets advise and did press him when he should not have. Lee did not survey the battlefield area of round tops or devils den (should hv been present to hear Hoods opinion of rocky terrain)....Longstreets spy=Harrison gave Lee excellent intellignece; and for 2 days the way around the left of Meades army was vulverable!....also Lee should have taken the word &quot;practicable&quot; out of his vocabulary and been more decisive and insistant in his orders!...Lee used to right orders down but apparently switched to berbal communications after having his written orders fall into enemy hands in past battles...bottomline Lee was too hands off at Gettysburg...where was to on hands general that was in the thick of it at Manassas, Antietem and Chancelorsville?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gen. Lee was at fault at Gettysburg&#8230;he contributed 85% at least to this confederate loss&#8230;Lee heeded Ewell and did not press him, but instead &#034;did not&#034; heed Longstreets advise and did press him when he should not have. Lee did not survey the battlefield area of round tops or devils den (should hv been present to hear Hoods opinion of rocky terrain)&#8230;.Longstreets spy=Harrison gave Lee excellent intellignece; and for 2 days the way around the left of Meades army was vulverable!&#8230;.also Lee should have taken the word &#034;practicable&#034; out of his vocabulary and been more decisive and insistant in his orders!&#8230;Lee used to right orders down but apparently switched to berbal communications after having his written orders fall into enemy hands in past battles&#8230;bottomline Lee was too hands off at Gettysburg&#8230;where was to on hands general that was in the thick of it at Manassas, Antietem and Chancelorsville?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomDem55</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-92691</link>
		<dc:creator>TomDem55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-92691</guid>
		<description>Lee Lee Lee, I say GRANT, Lee was most assuredly not worried about McClellan, who had no stomach for war, just parades......
Lee did screw up at Gettysburg, he underestimated the Union troops and overestimated his own troops. 

And for Petes&#039;s sake Picketts&#039; charge&gt; hell the Irish Brigade and other Union troops went up that little hill in Fredericksburg 7 times!!!
(Mayres heights) 

a pox on Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Lee Lee, I say GRANT, Lee was most assuredly not worried about McClellan, who had no stomach for war, just parades&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Lee did screw up at Gettysburg, he underestimated the Union troops and overestimated his own troops. </p>
<p>And for Petes&#039;s sake Picketts&#039; charge&gt; hell the Irish Brigade and other Union troops went up that little hill in Fredericksburg 7 times!!!<br />
(Mayres heights) </p>
<p>a pox on Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-91817</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-91817</guid>
		<description>The key to victory for the South was to hold onto Vicksburg.  Gettysburg gets way too much attention because of Lee.

With the fall of Vicksburg, the South was split.  Lee should have listened to Richmond and sent some of his troops south.

Maybe it would have extended the war for a year or two... but that&#039;s about it.  The South could not when a war against the North.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to victory for the South was to hold onto Vicksburg.  Gettysburg gets way too much attention because of Lee.</p>
<p>With the fall of Vicksburg, the South was split.  Lee should have listened to Richmond and sent some of his troops south.</p>
<p>Maybe it would have extended the war for a year or two&#8230; but that&#039;s about it.  The South could not when a war against the North.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CESAR ESPARZA</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee-at-gettysburg.htm#comment-91572</link>
		<dc:creator>CESAR ESPARZA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681107#comment-91572</guid>
		<description>this is an excellent piece of literature ,that gives us light  on one of the hypothesis that could explain Souths&#039; final defeat of the civil war. congratulations!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is an excellent piece of literature ,that gives us light  on one of the hypothesis that could explain Souths&#039; final defeat of the civil war. congratulations!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

