<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaders Step Back &#171; thevainyogi</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-877528</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaders Step Back &#171; thevainyogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 04:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-877528</guid>
		<description>[...] had strong companions on his journey! A companion with a strong mind, for making tough and wily calculations! A companion with a strong enteric system, for making tough [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had strong companions on his journey! A companion with a strong mind, for making tough and wily calculations! A companion with a strong enteric system, for making tough [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hope obama is right about romney &#124; Pundit House</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-809704</link>
		<dc:creator>hope obama is right about romney &#124; Pundit House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-809704</guid>
		<description>[...] understand. Reagan&#8217;s &#8220;peace through strength&#8221; doctrine allowed him to take a stand when necessary and walk away when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] understand. Reagan&#039;s &#034;peace through strength&#034; doctrine allowed him to take a stand when necessary and walk away when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War. Part one</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-808358</link>
		<dc:creator>President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War. Part one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-808358</guid>
		<description>[...] Consequently, when the Soviet Union collapsed, no one was more surprised than Gorbachev.  http://www.historynet.com/president-...e-cold-war.htm    Beam me up Scottie, no intelligent life down here.        Reply With Quote                 Quick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consequently, when the Soviet Union collapsed, no one was more surprised than Gorbachev.  <a href="http://www.historynet.com/president-" rel="nofollow">http://www.historynet.com/president-</a>&#8230;e-cold-war.htm    Beam me up Scottie, no intelligent life down here.        Reply With Quote                 Quick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-806808</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-806808</guid>
		<description>You forgot two commas. -_-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot two commas. -_-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-789194</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-789194</guid>
		<description>Ever since 1945 even up until now. The question is that we have been put into a patience mod. The model has been put into place. What everyone is doing is waiting for a plan to act. No amount of threats have been taken that serious until today. Tensions are mounting high due to a failed economic structure that has set the theatre. All doctorines have concluded the announcement of the sick bear being ready to take back their socialistic idealisms as soon as they can find right colaberated team to decide their future or fate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since 1945 even up until now. The question is that we have been put into a patience mod. The model has been put into place. What everyone is doing is waiting for a plan to act. No amount of threats have been taken that serious until today. Tensions are mounting high due to a failed economic structure that has set the theatre. All doctorines have concluded the announcement of the sick bear being ready to take back their socialistic idealisms as soon as they can find right colaberated team to decide their future or fate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santorum will not be getting my vote... - Page 4 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-788815</link>
		<dc:creator>Santorum will not be getting my vote... - Page 4 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-788815</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by muleskinner   Reagan won the cold war????? Uhhhh...I really hope you are not a history teacher    Read and learn grasshopper. President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by muleskinner   Reagan won the cold war????? Uhhhh&#8230;I really hope you are not a history teacher    Read and learn grasshopper. President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 57nomad</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-778806</link>
		<dc:creator>57nomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-778806</guid>
		<description>serge says:

&quot;But actually I am really stunned that this fairy tale about Regan&#039;s military build up and it&#039;s presumed influence on the end of the cold war is being repeated so many times even after many documents of the soviet union are diclassified and available for researchers.&quot;

FTA:

&quot;Commenting on the Reagan arms buildup, the Soviet journal Izvestiya protested, &#039;They want to impose on us an even more ruinous arms race.&#039; General Secretary Yuri Andropov alleged that Reagan&#039;s missile defense program was &#039;a bid to disarm the Soviet Union.&#039; The seasoned diplomat Andrei Gromyko charged that &#039;behind all this lies the clear calculation that the USSR will exhaust its material resources…and therefore will be forced to surrender.&#039; &quot;

That is exactly what happened.  The Russians miscalculated, but you can&#039;t blame them because they were doing pretty good.  Their proxies had just won protracted wars in Vietnam, Laos, and  Cambodia, and had taken over the Sandinista revolution and Grenada, and were fighting in several places in Africa and by 1980 if bets were being made as to who was going to come out on top in the cold war the smart money would have been on the Soviet Union.

The Russians gambled everything they had on the strategy of threatening our southern border and Europe simultaneously.  They spent every ruble on a fleet of mobile, accurate IRBM&#039;s called SS-20&#039;s and aimed them at western Europe.  Despite huge anti-American demonstrations all over Europe denouncing it, Reagan had the Pershing IRBM developed and deployed in Europe and pointed at the Russians.

That was it.  That was all the Russians had.  Reagan armed the Contras in Nicaragua, he invaded and liberated Grenada, he armed the mujahedin with stingers, but his trump card was SDI.  No matter what any snooty intellectual has to say about whether or not SDI would work, it didn&#039;t matter.  Here&#039;s why.  The Russians thought it would work.  

A million critics can write a million stories about how Reagan stumbled through his presidency,  history doesn&#039;t lie.  Reagan knew he didn&#039;t have to convince his critics. They didn&#039;t matter at all and they still don&#039;t.  He knew that the Russians were convinced.  Our guys had already been on the moon for over 10 years so the Russians had no doubt we had the technological ability devise a way to defeat a ballistic missile attack.   That was it for the Soviet Union.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>serge says:</p>
<p>&#034;But actually I am really stunned that this fairy tale about Regan&#039;s military build up and it&#039;s presumed influence on the end of the cold war is being repeated so many times even after many documents of the soviet union are diclassified and available for researchers.&#034;</p>
<p>FTA:</p>
<p>&#034;Commenting on the Reagan arms buildup, the Soviet journal Izvestiya protested, &#039;They want to impose on us an even more ruinous arms race.&#039; General Secretary Yuri Andropov alleged that Reagan&#039;s missile defense program was &#039;a bid to disarm the Soviet Union.&#039; The seasoned diplomat Andrei Gromyko charged that &#039;behind all this lies the clear calculation that the USSR will exhaust its material resources…and therefore will be forced to surrender.&#039; &#034;</p>
<p>That is exactly what happened.  The Russians miscalculated, but you can&#039;t blame them because they were doing pretty good.  Their proxies had just won protracted wars in Vietnam, Laos, and  Cambodia, and had taken over the Sandinista revolution and Grenada, and were fighting in several places in Africa and by 1980 if bets were being made as to who was going to come out on top in the cold war the smart money would have been on the Soviet Union.</p>
<p>The Russians gambled everything they had on the strategy of threatening our southern border and Europe simultaneously.  They spent every ruble on a fleet of mobile, accurate IRBM&#039;s called SS-20&#039;s and aimed them at western Europe.  Despite huge anti-American demonstrations all over Europe denouncing it, Reagan had the Pershing IRBM developed and deployed in Europe and pointed at the Russians.</p>
<p>That was it.  That was all the Russians had.  Reagan armed the Contras in Nicaragua, he invaded and liberated Grenada, he armed the mujahedin with stingers, but his trump card was SDI.  No matter what any snooty intellectual has to say about whether or not SDI would work, it didn&#039;t matter.  Here&#039;s why.  The Russians thought it would work.  </p>
<p>A million critics can write a million stories about how Reagan stumbled through his presidency,  history doesn&#039;t lie.  Reagan knew he didn&#039;t have to convince his critics. They didn&#039;t matter at all and they still don&#039;t.  He knew that the Russians were convinced.  Our guys had already been on the moon for over 10 years so the Russians had no doubt we had the technological ability devise a way to defeat a ballistic missile attack.   That was it for the Soviet Union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinion: What Liberals Don&#8217;t Get about Reagan (or Chris Christie) &#124; WORDPRESS PORTAL</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-778666</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinion: What Liberals Don&#8217;t Get about Reagan (or Chris Christie) &#124; WORDPRESS PORTAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-778666</guid>
		<description>[...] some-more spending cuts than any other complicated president&#8221;, did whatever he had to do to stop a Soviet Union in a tracks and brought a wish to a damaged America that stream hope-change proclaimers could usually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some-more spending cuts than any other complicated president&#034;, did whatever he had to do to stop a Soviet Union in a tracks and brought a wish to a damaged America that stream hope-change proclaimers could usually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: References &#124; History 1945 to Present</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-733502</link>
		<dc:creator>References &#124; History 1945 to Present</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-733502</guid>
		<description>[...] N/A. (2006). President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War. Retrieved from: http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] N/A. (2006). President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War. Retrieved from: <a href="http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Sabaduquia</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-662229</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Sabaduquia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-662229</guid>
		<description>whose not who&#039;s leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whose not who&#039;s leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
