<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:45:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santorum will not be getting my vote... - Page 4 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-788815</link>
		<dc:creator>Santorum will not be getting my vote... - Page 4 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-788815</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by muleskinner   Reagan won the cold war????? Uhhhh...I really hope you are not a history teacher    Read and learn grasshopper. President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by muleskinner   Reagan won the cold war????? Uhhhh&#8230;I really hope you are not a history teacher    Read and learn grasshopper. President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 57nomad</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-778806</link>
		<dc:creator>57nomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-778806</guid>
		<description>serge says:

&quot;But actually I am really stunned that this fairy tale about Regan&#039;s military build up and it&#039;s presumed influence on the end of the cold war is being repeated so many times even after many documents of the soviet union are diclassified and available for researchers.&quot;

FTA:

&quot;Commenting on the Reagan arms buildup, the Soviet journal Izvestiya protested, &#039;They want to impose on us an even more ruinous arms race.&#039; General Secretary Yuri Andropov alleged that Reagan&#039;s missile defense program was &#039;a bid to disarm the Soviet Union.&#039; The seasoned diplomat Andrei Gromyko charged that &#039;behind all this lies the clear calculation that the USSR will exhaust its material resources…and therefore will be forced to surrender.&#039; &quot;

That is exactly what happened.  The Russians miscalculated, but you can&#039;t blame them because they were doing pretty good.  Their proxies had just won protracted wars in Vietnam, Laos, and  Cambodia, and had taken over the Sandinista revolution and Grenada, and were fighting in several places in Africa and by 1980 if bets were being made as to who was going to come out on top in the cold war the smart money would have been on the Soviet Union.

The Russians gambled everything they had on the strategy of threatening our southern border and Europe simultaneously.  They spent every ruble on a fleet of mobile, accurate IRBM&#039;s called SS-20&#039;s and aimed them at western Europe.  Despite huge anti-American demonstrations all over Europe denouncing it, Reagan had the Pershing IRBM developed and deployed in Europe and pointed at the Russians.

That was it.  That was all the Russians had.  Reagan armed the Contras in Nicaragua, he invaded and liberated Grenada, he armed the mujahedin with stingers, but his trump card was SDI.  No matter what any snooty intellectual has to say about whether or not SDI would work, it didn&#039;t matter.  Here&#039;s why.  The Russians thought it would work.  

A million critics can write a million stories about how Reagan stumbled through his presidency,  history doesn&#039;t lie.  Reagan knew he didn&#039;t have to convince his critics. They didn&#039;t matter at all and they still don&#039;t.  He knew that the Russians were convinced.  Our guys had already been on the moon for over 10 years so the Russians had no doubt we had the technological ability devise a way to defeat a ballistic missile attack.   That was it for the Soviet Union.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>serge says:</p>
<p>&#034;But actually I am really stunned that this fairy tale about Regan&#039;s military build up and it&#039;s presumed influence on the end of the cold war is being repeated so many times even after many documents of the soviet union are diclassified and available for researchers.&#034;</p>
<p>FTA:</p>
<p>&#034;Commenting on the Reagan arms buildup, the Soviet journal Izvestiya protested, &#039;They want to impose on us an even more ruinous arms race.&#039; General Secretary Yuri Andropov alleged that Reagan&#039;s missile defense program was &#039;a bid to disarm the Soviet Union.&#039; The seasoned diplomat Andrei Gromyko charged that &#039;behind all this lies the clear calculation that the USSR will exhaust its material resources…and therefore will be forced to surrender.&#039; &#034;</p>
<p>That is exactly what happened.  The Russians miscalculated, but you can&#039;t blame them because they were doing pretty good.  Their proxies had just won protracted wars in Vietnam, Laos, and  Cambodia, and had taken over the Sandinista revolution and Grenada, and were fighting in several places in Africa and by 1980 if bets were being made as to who was going to come out on top in the cold war the smart money would have been on the Soviet Union.</p>
<p>The Russians gambled everything they had on the strategy of threatening our southern border and Europe simultaneously.  They spent every ruble on a fleet of mobile, accurate IRBM&#039;s called SS-20&#039;s and aimed them at western Europe.  Despite huge anti-American demonstrations all over Europe denouncing it, Reagan had the Pershing IRBM developed and deployed in Europe and pointed at the Russians.</p>
<p>That was it.  That was all the Russians had.  Reagan armed the Contras in Nicaragua, he invaded and liberated Grenada, he armed the mujahedin with stingers, but his trump card was SDI.  No matter what any snooty intellectual has to say about whether or not SDI would work, it didn&#039;t matter.  Here&#039;s why.  The Russians thought it would work.  </p>
<p>A million critics can write a million stories about how Reagan stumbled through his presidency,  history doesn&#039;t lie.  Reagan knew he didn&#039;t have to convince his critics. They didn&#039;t matter at all and they still don&#039;t.  He knew that the Russians were convinced.  Our guys had already been on the moon for over 10 years so the Russians had no doubt we had the technological ability devise a way to defeat a ballistic missile attack.   That was it for the Soviet Union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinion: What Liberals Don&#8217;t Get about Reagan (or Chris Christie) &#124; WORDPRESS PORTAL</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-778666</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinion: What Liberals Don&#8217;t Get about Reagan (or Chris Christie) &#124; WORDPRESS PORTAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-778666</guid>
		<description>[...] some-more spending cuts than any other complicated president&#8221;, did whatever he had to do to stop a Soviet Union in a tracks and brought a wish to a damaged America that stream hope-change proclaimers could usually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some-more spending cuts than any other complicated president&#034;, did whatever he had to do to stop a Soviet Union in a tracks and brought a wish to a damaged America that stream hope-change proclaimers could usually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: References &#124; History 1945 to Present</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-733502</link>
		<dc:creator>References &#124; History 1945 to Present</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-733502</guid>
		<description>[...] N/A. (2006). President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War. Retrieved from: http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] N/A. (2006). President Ronald Reagan: Winning the Cold War. Retrieved from: <a href="http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Sabaduquia</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-662229</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Sabaduquia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-662229</guid>
		<description>whose not who&#039;s leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whose not who&#039;s leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Hiltz</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-482879</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Hiltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 02:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-482879</guid>
		<description>The Soviets did themselves in. The people of Poland started the ball rolling and the citizens of the Soviet Union finished the job. Yesterday I heard a radio interview of a former Reagan staff person (sorry, I can remember his name) by Thom Hartmann. The staff member also seems to believe that Reagan did indeed single handedly bring down the Soviets. Hartmann had to remind this person that the Soviet Union officially collapsed during Bush Sr. administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Soviets did themselves in. The people of Poland started the ball rolling and the citizens of the Soviet Union finished the job. Yesterday I heard a radio interview of a former Reagan staff person (sorry, I can remember his name) by Thom Hartmann. The staff member also seems to believe that Reagan did indeed single handedly bring down the Soviets. Hartmann had to remind this person that the Soviet Union officially collapsed during Bush Sr. administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Declaring War on Superintendents &#171; Burque Babble</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-455639</link>
		<dc:creator>Declaring War on Superintendents &#171; Burque Babble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-455639</guid>
		<description>[...] belt-tightening and &#8220;failing&#8221; schools, it has become easier than ever to focus on the Grenadas of the educational landscape, because facing the real enemy is too difficult and too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] belt-tightening and &#034;failing&#034; schools, it has become easier than ever to focus on the Grenadas of the educational landscape, because facing the real enemy is too difficult and too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ill Fares the Land, by Tony Judt - Whittaker Chambers in Books</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-314260</link>
		<dc:creator>Ill Fares the Land, by Tony Judt - Whittaker Chambers in Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 03:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-314260</guid>
		<description>[...] false prediction [see Spectator, Claremont Review of Books, First Principles, National Review, American History, Commentary]. However, such people rarely consider a basic truth about “the losing world.” Mr. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] false prediction [see Spectator, Claremont Review of Books, First Principles, National Review, American History, Commentary]. However, such people rarely consider a basic truth about “the losing world.” Mr. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oak</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-278334</link>
		<dc:creator>Oak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-278334</guid>
		<description>in response to the ignoramus who goes by Dale, the U.S.S.R. did run out of money but it was because Reagan ran them out of money. I will grant you that the Soviet economy would have collapsed on its own given enough time, however to ignore everything Reagan did to accelerate the process is stubborn, thick-headed and just plain stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in response to the ignoramus who goes by Dale, the U.S.S.R. did run out of money but it was because Reagan ran them out of money. I will grant you that the Soviet economy would have collapsed on its own given enough time, however to ignore everything Reagan did to accelerate the process is stubborn, thick-headed and just plain stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/president-ronald-reagan-winning-the-cold-war.htm#comment-200671</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 02:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-200671</guid>
		<description>this is total bull Reagan didnt defeat the soviet union their economy emploded. they ran out of money!!!!!! Reagan didnt do sh**</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is total bull Reagan didnt defeat the soviet union their economy emploded. they ran out of money!!!!!! Reagan didnt do sh**</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

