http://www.historynet.com/military-history-september-2012-letters-from-readers.htm From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher Sun, 26 May 2013 04:41:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://www.historynet.com/military-history-september-2012-letters-from-readers.htm#comment-823135 florian Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:08:54 +0000 http://www.historynet.com/?p=13686104#comment-823135 Regarding the kasserine pass . The only lesson tha american lerned is to abandon the M3 Grant and to use the M4 . Unfotunelly for the american side this is the only lesson . By the 1943 the panzer 4 with L43 75 mm cannon was a more powerfull a better tank then the M4 and in 1943 the germans introduced the panzer 4 with l/48 75 mm long barel cannon and impruved armor protection much better tank then the standard M4. And the M4 did exploded more often the the panzers due to bad design of the fighting compartment. As a metter of fact all the german antitank weapons had a devastating efect on allies armor and very fiew american , british had a devastating efect on germans. Regarding the kasserine pass . The only lesson tha american lerned is to abandon the M3 Grant and to use the M4 . Unfotunelly for the american side this is the only lesson . By the 1943 the panzer 4 with L43 75 mm cannon was a more powerfull a better tank then the M4 and in 1943 the germans introduced the panzer 4 with l/48 75 mm long barel cannon and impruved armor protection much better tank then the standard M4. And the M4 did exploded more often the the panzers due to bad design of the fighting compartment. As a metter of fact all the german antitank weapons had a devastating efect on allies armor and very fiew american , british had a devastating efect on germans.

]]>