http://www.historynet.com/military-history-reader-poll-july-2012.htm From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher Wed, 22 May 2013 17:59:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://www.historynet.com/military-history-reader-poll-july-2012.htm#comment-821014 lyndon Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:08:18 +0000 http://www.historynet.com/?p=13685680#comment-821014 Who were the winners in the 1812 war? Who were the winners in the 1812 war?

]]> http://www.historynet.com/military-history-reader-poll-july-2012.htm#comment-813599 Mike H. Sun, 29 Jul 2012 02:11:40 +0000 http://www.historynet.com/?p=13685680#comment-813599 Between the enormous capability of the Royal Navy, and Admiral Lord Nelson; I believe we might've been flying the Union Jack again. Herbster, I think a 74-gun Ship-of-the-Line would be something a bit more than "problematic"...and England had a bunch of them...we had none. Game over. Between the enormous capability of the Royal Navy, and Admiral Lord Nelson; I believe we might've been flying the Union Jack again. Herbster, I think a 74-gun Ship-of-the-Line would be something a bit more than "problematic"…and England had a bunch of them…we had none. Game over.

]]> http://www.historynet.com/military-history-reader-poll-july-2012.htm#comment-811876 Herbster Mon, 09 Jul 2012 23:28:02 +0000 http://www.historynet.com/?p=13685680#comment-811876 The Royal Navy would have proved somewhat problematic to the privateers, but by using unorthodox tactics, would have had more successes than failures. The Royal Navy would have proved somewhat problematic to the privateers, but by using unorthodox tactics, would have had more successes than failures.

]]>