Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Military History - July 2014 - Letters From Readers

Originally published by Military History magazine. Published Online: April 30, 2014 
Print Friendly
1 comment FONT +  FONT -

An Airman of the Mighty Eighth
[Re. "When Maggie Flew With the Forts," May:] I am a 90-year-old World War II veteran of the 385th Bomb Group of the "Mighty Eighth" Air Force. I appreciate the acknowledgement of the terrible environment we endured, made obvious with your cover on the May issue.

'In combat we always wore a Mae West (lifejacket) and a parachute harness over those fleece-lined jackets'

May I suggest that the pictures you used are a bit staged rather than authentic? On the cover and PP. 46 and 51 the goggles and helmets depicted are of much later issue than 1945. [Re. the photo] on P. 51: In combat we always wore a Mae West (lifejacket) and a parachute harness over those fleece-lined jackets. Nowhere overseas did I ever see chairs as shown on P. 50.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Military History magazine

However, the overall discomfort level of active combat was well portrayed. Although you might have added the duration—up to nine or more hours that we were so garbed. Also, unlike the infantry, if we were injured, there was no first aid corpsman available until we got home and landed.

William "Bill" Varnedoe
Huntsville, Ala.

Editor responds: Life photographer Margaret Bourke-White doubtless staged several of the photos that appeared both in that magazine and in our recent portfolio—particularly the image on our cover and the shot of the two waist gunners inside the B-17. However, all the photos were taken during her visit to England in 1942, and many ran in the October 1942 issue of Life.

Worst Weapons
[Re. "10 of History's Worst Weapons," by Stephan Wilkinson, May:] Enjoyed this article tremendously. It brought to mind an incident we experienced in Germany in early 1945 during our "all-expenses paid tour" of Europe. My outfit was the 2941st Engineer Technical Intelligence Team (ETIT), a euphemistic title for people whose job it was to dig up enemy mines and booby traps, take them apart and show the guys at the front how they worked and what to do and, especially, what not to do if they encountered any. On this occasion our orders were to cooperate in testing a new device to protect our tanks and their crews from the effects of the aforementioned weapons.

An American Army officer had designed this new thing consisting of two I-beams rotating on short axles welded to the tank's sides, supporting an axle between them with 10 concrete rollers, each about 4 feet in diameter and a foot wide. The idea was that as the tank moved forward, the rollers—about six or eight feet in front of the tank—would set off the mine, disabling one or, at most, two of the rollers. This would be very useful in dealing with minefields and roads not yet cleared.

Having all kinds of mines, German and Allied, at our disposal, we buried a small French anti-tank mine in the road, camouflaging it so the tank crew wouldn't know when they hit it. We then retreated to a safe distance and waited for the tank. Here it came, moving slowly, and the rollers hit the mine, resulting in a very satisfying explosion. The entire roller assembly was lifted into the air along with the front of the tank, all of which then crashed back down onto the road. When we got there, we found the tank undamaged as well as the crew, apart from some shaking up. But nine of the 10 rollers were shattered—and this from a mine having nowhere near the power of the German Teller anti-tank mines. Another good, war-winning idea shot to hell in its encounter with reality.

Harold Ranzenhofer
Port Hueneme, Calif.

Hereward
I write to commend the artwork for "Last Stand at Ely," by Kim Stubbs [May]. In a style beloved by my generation of military historians, who were raised on a steady diet of Will Eisner's art in Mad magazine, Peter Jackson's lively two-page spread (PP. 28–29) captures the action in a way other art cannot.

I submit it could also have carried bold Middle Ages battle sounds in caps, like SMITE! HACK! and GRAMERCY!

Philip J. Gioia
San Francisco, Calif.

Where's Wales?
I enjoyed your article on Michael Collins. However, there is an inconsistency in your insert map on P. 51. It displays a map of the United Kingdom showing England and Scotland—but no Wales? At the moment the U.K. consists of four different countries.

Rhys Jones
Anglesey, Wales

Editor responds: Forgive us, boyo! We did neglect to indicate that border and label Wales—and the mother of one of the editors was a coal miner's daughter from Crumlin, South Wales. Cyrmu am byth ("Long live Wales")!

Michael Collins
Re. "Rebel of the Cause," by Ron Soodalter, March 2014: I am appalled that such a fine magazine as yours could post such a blatantly biased and inaccurate article, especially in the age of the Shamrock Awakening, when so many of the myths and downright lies of popular Irish history are being challenged. There are almost too many points to challenge, but foremost I would state that Michael Collins was more of a hindrance to the Republican movement than a help, British intelligence capturing so many of his invaluable documents that they had to create an entire department to read them all. Second, the article never mentions once that Ireland had already been granted progressive independence by the British Parliament in 1914, and that the Anglo-Irish Treaty was a massive defeat for the IRA. The only "freedom" Michael Collins ever wanted was an Ireland "free" of Irish unionists.

Patrick Walker
Londonderry
Northern Ireland

Ron Soodalter responds: Few would question Collins was manipulated into making a bad deal with the British. As to whether he was a hindrance to the Cause, his legacy speaks volumes for his contribution. Regarding Collins and British intelligence, however, I suggest you read Michael Collins and the Anglo-Irish War: Britain's Counterinsurgency Failure (2011), by J.B.E. Hittle, a decorated U.S. military intelligence analyst and authority on guerrilla warfare, counterinsurgency and counterterrorism. His book lays out in minute detail the devastating impact of Collins' organization on the British spy network. Ask yourself: If the British had so much intelligence on Collins, how did he manage to hide in plain sight for so long without being caught or killed?

Send letters to Editor, Military History, Weider History Group, 19300 Promenade Dr., Leesburg, VA 20176 or via e-mail. Please include name, address and phone number.


One Response to “Military History - July 2014 - Letters From Readers”


  1. 1
    Patrick Walker says:

    Thank you very much for replying to me. I’m afraid once again I’ll have to query your source material. I have read Mr Hittle’s book but I’m afraid it is a deeply flawed work, taking a premise and then tailoring the evidence and selectively twisting it to suit his presumptions. He dismisses Irish Unionists as ‘Orange extremists’ seemingly for objecting to being massacred and subjugated. He thinks the DMP’s G-division was entirely composed of Northern Protestants (making you wonder if his source material was Neil Jordan’s risible and frankly offensive Michael Collins biopic?) and that regular Black and Tans operated as a separate entity to the ordinary RIC when accents aside they were in fact indistinguishable. He compares the Auxillaries who eventually carried out the vigilante killing of IRA terrorists after showing near superhuman restraint to Nazi death squads who indiscriminately slaughtered entire villages of innocent people during World War 2! He also makes the classic prejudicial fallacy of equating ‘British’ with ‘English’, revealing his true colours and mindset.
    In reply to your riposte I would suggest that Michael Collins invaluable captured documents never betrayed himself because he never actually did anything, he was an Osama Bin Laden like figure who sent teenagers out to murder people in their beds but never once risked his own life (his reputation seems to largely be based on the notion that he ran away and hid a lot?). Collins was goaded during the Dail debates over the Treaty about him never having fired a shot, hence his taking the opportunity to fire a few rounds at a retreating enemy when ambushed and getting his head blown off.
    Collins was actually captured twice, once he was released in one of the numerous repeated prisoner pardons which forced the security forces into vigilante actions out of pure survival. The second time he simply paid his bail and then skipped out.
    Collins image as ‘the man who beat the British’ is purely wishful thinking on the part of Irish Nationalists, Home Rule simply gave him advantages previous revolutionaries lacked but he wasted them, his documents provided an intelligence mother lode to Sir Ormonde Winter beyond anything any G-division detective or informer could possibly have generated, he was the equivalent of a one man Enigma machine for British Intelligence. Frankly it would have been better for the IRA had he been captured or killed, then the Raid Bureau wouldn’t have been able to read his mail any more.
    Collins achieved nothing, in the end he was forced to capitulate at the Treaty negotiations when Lloyd George threatened a resumption of hostilities. He received a slightly enhanced version of Home Rule in return for the permanent exclusion of Northern Ireland, constitutional Irish Nationalists would have got the same if they’d agreed to such terms. The British government achieved their objectives, he failed in his, no Gaelic, Catholic, united Irish Republic without any link to the rest of the British Isles. It was still infinitely easier for the British government to crush the IRA than to attempt coerce Irish Unionists into a united Ireland (and if British public opinion and the armed forces wouldn’t stand for that before Irish Republicans started mass murder they certainly wouldn’t endorse it afterwards).



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy