<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HistoryNet - From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher &#187; Civil War Times Archives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/magazines/civil_war_times/civil-war-times-editorials/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com</link>
	<description>From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hanging Captain Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/hanging-captain-gordon.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/hanging-captain-gordon.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kholland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nathaniel Gordon was the only American sent to the gallows for slave traiding.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/hanging-captain-gordon.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: March 2001 Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-march-2001-editorial.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-march-2001-editorial.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[															From the Editor							Civil War Times
									NO WHITE SHOES						
			My wife is quick to recognize the telltale signs. Whenever I mention that a man in his 40s has gotten his ear pierced, or done something aggressively stylish with his hair, she recites, &#8220;Next it&#8217;ll be a little red sports car. Then he&#8217;ll start wearing white shoes. It&#8217;s just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-march-2001-editorial.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: December 2000 Letters</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-december-2000-letters.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-december-2000-letters.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2000 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[															Letters - Submit									Civil War Times						BLUNT WAS SHARPER THAN THAT
For the last fifteen years I have been collecting primary-source material on Major General James G. Blunt. So I was quite shocked by the mistake in &#8220;Hindman&#8217;s Grand Delusion&#8221; (October 2000). The assertion in the last paragraph, that Schofield unleashed the raid on Van Buren, Arkansas, is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-december-2000-letters.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: May 2000 Letters</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-may-2000-letters.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-may-2000-letters.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2000 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[															Letters - Submit									Civil War Times
THE END OF THE WAR         
 Thank you, Dr. Castel, for your article in the May issue. Although           I count myself a believer in the theory that the Civil War was largely  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-may-2000-letters.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: August 2000 Letters</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-august-2000-letters.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-august-2000-letters.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2000 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[															Letters - Submit									Civil War Times						COVER-HOGGING OVERINDULGENCE
When I was 10 years old, I was at a friend&#8217;s house and happened upon his father&#8217;s January 1978 issue of CWTI. I have collected and read cover to cover every issue since February 1978, when William C. Davis was editor.
I have never written before this time and have now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-august-2000-letters.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: May 2000 Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-may-2000-editorial.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-may-2000-editorial.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2000 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[															From the Editor							Civil War Times
									CURSES! TOGETHER AGAIN!						
			The United States was back, but not everyone was happy about it. It comes as no surprise that the soldiers and civilians of the Confederate States of America were disappointed in the events of mid-1865. But the Confederates were not alone in their unhappiness. They were joined by England [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-may-2000-editorial.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: December 2000 Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-december-2000-editorial.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-december-2000-editorial.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2000 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[															From the Editor							Civil War Times
									NATURAL CAUSES						
			Nothing gives you an appreciation for the modern world like a good case of some formerly fatal disease. In my case, it was pneumonia&#8211;specifically, mycoplasma pneumonia, which spread all through both of my lungs, and stole the whole month of August from me.
Of course, disease never comes and goes politely, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-december-2000-editorial.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: October 2000 Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-october-2000-editorial.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-october-2000-editorial.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2000 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[															From the Editor							Civil War Times
									BEATING A DEAD TOWER						
			I guess by now you&#8217;ve heard about the demise of the National Battlefield Tower at Gettysburg. The tower went down with a crash&#8211;and a flourish. Through the miracle of modern communications technology, the detonation of strategically placed dynamite was synchronized with the firing of a cannon aimed at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-october-2000-editorial.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: June 1999 Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-june-1999-editorial.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-june-1999-editorial.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the EditorCivil War Times
CHANGES AND CONSTANTS
Things are changing fast at Civil War Times. It&#8217;s March 31&#8211;we have to prepare each issue well in advance of the time it actually reaches you&#8211;and spring has come on pretty suddenly here in central Pennsylvania. One day it was snowing and freezing cold. A few days later, we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-june-1999-editorial.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil War Times: March 1999 Letters</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-march-1999-letters.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-march-1999-letters.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HistoryNet Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil War Times Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Letters - SubmitCivil War TimesThe Fighting Irish
Upon reading James Callaghan&#8217;s article &#8220;Red on Green&#8221; (December 1998), I was amused to see a mention of the wounding of Lieutenant Seneca G. Willauer of the 116th Pennsylvania during the Union&#8217;s ill-fated assault at Fredericksburg. Seneca survived this wound, was promoted to captain three months later, and went [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-times-march-1999-letters.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
