<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madame Loreta Janeta Velazquez: Heroine or Hoaxer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 05:23:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Topic and Five Potential Sources &#171; ENG 102 Cindy Solis</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-787308</link>
		<dc:creator>My Topic and Five Potential Sources &#171; ENG 102 Cindy Solis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-787308</guid>
		<description>[...] -          http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] -          <a href="http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-780083</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-780083</guid>
		<description>Loreta Velasquez was a fraud.  Taking just her story of Ball&#039;s Bluff, this becomes obvious.  She claimed to have taken command of a company of Confederate troops that had lost all of its officers and led it through the battle.  

She never identifies the company or the regiment of which it was a part and, in fact, no Confederate company at Ball&#039;s Bluff came remotely close to losing all of its officers.  Her story falls apart right there.

But she also had claimed to have simply shown up in the Confederate camp some weeks before and obtained rations and quarters though she had no orders and no particular justification as an officers for being there.  

No army works that way.  The first thing the Confederate commander would have done is get some ID and ask for orders.  He also would have checked on their legitimacy.  Yet she claims simply to have been accepted and to have made herself a part of the Confederate brigade at Leesburg.  

If the Ball&#039;s Bluff part of her story is so easily demolished, one must wonder how much truth there is in any part of it.  In short, she was a liar and a fraud and may well have been crazy to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loreta Velasquez was a fraud.  Taking just her story of Ball&#039;s Bluff, this becomes obvious.  She claimed to have taken command of a company of Confederate troops that had lost all of its officers and led it through the battle.  </p>
<p>She never identifies the company or the regiment of which it was a part and, in fact, no Confederate company at Ball&#039;s Bluff came remotely close to losing all of its officers.  Her story falls apart right there.</p>
<p>But she also had claimed to have simply shown up in the Confederate camp some weeks before and obtained rations and quarters though she had no orders and no particular justification as an officers for being there.  </p>
<p>No army works that way.  The first thing the Confederate commander would have done is get some ID and ask for orders.  He also would have checked on their legitimacy.  Yet she claims simply to have been accepted and to have made herself a part of the Confederate brigade at Leesburg.  </p>
<p>If the Ball&#039;s Bluff part of her story is so easily demolished, one must wonder how much truth there is in any part of it.  In short, she was a liar and a fraud and may well have been crazy to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-720202</link>
		<dc:creator>kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-720202</guid>
		<description>maybe its because she wanted to stand up for women&#039;s rights and what women are capable of. she was a brave woman and she did fight for a good cause and it was a right cause. she never gave up .but deep inside shes a woman in a unique way...a true woman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe its because she wanted to stand up for women&#039;s rights and what women are capable of. she was a brave woman and she did fight for a good cause and it was a right cause. she never gave up .but deep inside shes a woman in a unique way&#8230;a true woman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigger</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-558164</link>
		<dc:creator>tigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 12:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-558164</guid>
		<description>i somewhat like this artical its ok but why would she wanna be a man????:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i somewhat like this artical its ok but why would she wanna be a man????:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-416094</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-416094</guid>
		<description>I have just finished reading this book, and I think it is like a romantic novel, based on a few grains of truth.

As the review says, the meetings with all the top figures are too neat and tidy. She claims to have spotted Grant at Shiloh, but he had only been famous for about a month  -  certainly not an iconic face recognisable by Confederate troops. The battle scenes are vivid, but do not suggest the team-effort of regimental life. She sounds like a soloist.

The espionage sounds more believable, though it is hard to imagine real women falling in love with the little drag-artist behind her huge black moustache and beard.

A good spy is a good liar. So is a good fiction-writer.

Thank you, Loretta for adding to the mythology of the Civil War, if not to the authentic history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just finished reading this book, and I think it is like a romantic novel, based on a few grains of truth.</p>
<p>As the review says, the meetings with all the top figures are too neat and tidy. She claims to have spotted Grant at Shiloh, but he had only been famous for about a month  &#8211;  certainly not an iconic face recognisable by Confederate troops. The battle scenes are vivid, but do not suggest the team-effort of regimental life. She sounds like a soloist.</p>
<p>The espionage sounds more believable, though it is hard to imagine real women falling in love with the little drag-artist behind her huge black moustache and beard.</p>
<p>A good spy is a good liar. So is a good fiction-writer.</p>
<p>Thank you, Loretta for adding to the mythology of the Civil War, if not to the authentic history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-346308</link>
		<dc:creator>jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-346308</guid>
		<description>does anyone know where this memior of hers might be? I need primary documents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know where this memior of hers might be? I need primary documents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cuhkiee</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-340424</link>
		<dc:creator>cuhkiee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-340424</guid>
		<description>wow this is one crazy person</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow this is one crazy person</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-230026</link>
		<dc:creator>nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-230026</guid>
		<description>i beleive this is an interesting web site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i beleive this is an interesting web site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lala Laylee</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-190155</link>
		<dc:creator>Lala Laylee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-190155</guid>
		<description>This is very peculiar, I too have seen this same information on a different website. Maybe we should just research some more and what ever information is repeated on a variety of websites is probably the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very peculiar, I too have seen this same information on a different website. Maybe we should just research some more and what ever information is repeated on a variety of websites is probably the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/madame-loreta-janeta-velazquez-heroine-or-hoaxer.htm#comment-189908</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-189908</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know which to believe. Not really the websites, but maye just the book she wrote. The information the websites get are mainly from the book. If they didn&#039;t have the book, a lot of things that they know wouldn&#039;t be up to read..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know which to believe. Not really the websites, but maye just the book she wrote. The information the websites get are mainly from the book. If they didn&#039;t have the book, a lot of things that they know wouldn&#039;t be up to read..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
