Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link World History Group RSS feed World History Group Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Looking Back Fondly on Glory: 20 Years Later

By Jay Wertz 
Originally published by Civil War Times magazine. Published Online: March 26, 2009 
Print Friendly
12 comments FONT +  FONT -

When their pay was cut, they also could have chosen to act differently. When they were not allowed to participate in the battles, they could have acted differently. I think somewhere along the line you began to sense from these men that they feel compelled to act out their duty as soldiers for the Union. They all have different motivations as Union soldiers. They insist on participation in the fighting to protect her, to hold her together. But they had a duty that was much stronger and much more compelling than their personal comfort, their safety, their rights, or their pain, so consequently it's a reminder to us.

Did you feel that Glory was going to be something special while you were filming it?
I was a kid, so I didn't see the perspective on these things. I was trying to keep my head above water professionally and personally. I was told we were breaking ground, but when you haven't seen the ground unbroken, you don't realize the importance of what's going on. Today I do, but not back then.

We've just passed another milestone in American history with the election of the first African-American president, Barack Obama. In considering this historic moment in light of what you learned making Glory, what is your reaction to Obama's election?

We seem to be progressing, the United States really accepting the full contribution of all of its citizens in fits and starts: two steps forward, one step back. Ideally it would have been wonderful after the Civil War to embrace our African-American citizens and to think what could have been built from the U.S. had African Americans not been used as scapegoats and terrorized for decades, centuries; then we would be so much further along as a people and as a the nation. It's begrudgingly that we moved to the place we are now, but I think that this election might represent a pivotal change in the ability of this country to really embrace its immigrants.

Jay Wertz is the Entertainment Correspondent for Weider History Group's Great History Web site, reporting on history as it relates to movies, television, and other areas of popular culture.

Page: 1 2 3

12 Responses to “Looking Back Fondly on Glory: 20 Years Later”

  1. 1
    Dave Ivy says:

    How about doing an article on 761st Tank Battalion in W W 2 and the 85th Cavalry Reconnaissance Battation in WW 2

  2. 2
    William Hale says:

    WHAT? Best Civil War movie of all time? Where did you come up with that claptrap?

    It was a decent movie, but it wasn't even close to being as good as Gettysburg or Gone with the Wind, or the Red Badge of Courage.

  3. 3
    Thomas M. Dale SR. says:

    Glory was good, but the best?? This is the false info that keeps people uninformed and angry about the truth of the cause of the civil war. This is just like the new sign to point out the under ground railroad that didn't exist at Point lookout!!! I enjoy your mag. most of the time, but after the headline attack on Gen. Lee and your pathetic response this month, i just don't know. As the editor of a news letter of the Sons of confederate Vetrans, i must get information from unbiased sources. Your editorDana Shoaf tried to make a statement that would damage R.E. Lee you can't. Many of us buy your Mag., but that may change. Gen. R.E.Lee was motivated by love of God and country and fought like hell to protect the rights of The South!!!!!!!!!!! T.M.Dale

  4. 4
    Ralph Blackwell says:

    Glory Was a great movie that was a real part in history long live the 54th…….RAB

  5. 5
    Charles Darnay says:

    Dear Mr. Hale, Robert E. Lee was a traitor to his country. Thank God the Union had a general like U.S. Grant in 1864 to ride his ass until Lee surrendered.Perhaps if Meade had chased him down after Gettysburg the war would have been over in 1863.

  6. 6
    Fred Campbell says:

    Dear Mr. Darnay, your comment & response to Mr. Hale concerning Gen. Robert E. Lee clearly shows your total ignorance about him. Why don't you ask Professor Walter Williams of George-Mason University, an African-American & syndicated editorial columnist, his opinion of Gen. Lee & the Confederate States' valiant but ultimately futile struggle for Independence..? Again, I want to emphasize that Dr. Williams is a Black Man.

  7. 7

    [...] Net has an interview with Andre Braugher Looking Back Fondly on Glory: 20 Years Later, about the Civil War movie Glory (my personal favorite Civil War movie), and African-American [...]

  8. 8
    John Koster says:

    "Glory" was a superb film and a necessary film because it counteracted the crass racism of "Birth of a Nation" and the somewhat more benign racism of "Gone With The Wind" — great entaintment but awful history. Ever see "So Red The Rose." (?) Blacks as savage primitives and Union soldiers as cowardly thieves? No thanks! "Glory" came a lot closer to the truth.

  9. 9
    Chris Hale says:

    Simply put (if Gen.Lee was a traiter so was George Washinton)

  10. 10
    Richard A. Krebes says:

    Interesting interview with a talented actor.

    In my opinion, "Glory" is a good movie thrown out of whack by a bad ending.
    They just kill all the characters off????
    Even "The Sand Pebbles" allowed one character -Candice Bergen's- to live.
    It was as if they did not know how to end it by having Andre, Carey, Morgan, and the other characters that made it over Fort Wagner's ramparts to simply charge along then suddenly stop to goggle at two Reb cannon crews swinging their guns about on them and then get wiped out. (Incidentally, I was confused forever about just what had happened to them due to the way they edited their deaths until I met online a re-enactor who played one of the Confederate gun crew members in that very scene and asked him just what happened!)
    What gives? Why didn't they cut down those Johnny Rebs at those guns with a blast of rifle-musket fire and then simply fight until they had to retreat? Be last seen trudging down the beach surrounded by survivors from the other units behind them, then cut to Shaw being buired with his men afterward?

    It just doesn't make any sense, that ending …

    If only Ron Maxwell -who admires "Glory"- had penned the script. We would have had as decisive, clear-cut, an ending as that which graces "Gettysburg" and "Gods And Generals." Films that, I'm sorry, leave "Glory" in third place.

  11. 11
    William Hale says:

    To Charles Darnay,

    Please read what I wrote before opening your mouth. You are obviously ignorant of the fact that I said NOTHING about RE LEE, my comment was that while Glory was indeed a good movie, it is not even close to being the best Civil War movie of all time.

  12. 12

    [...] Bostonian, and friend to Shaw and his second in command, Cabot Forbes (Cary Elwes) Braugher told [...]

Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Related Articles

History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet? is brought to you by World History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
World History Group

World History Group Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2015 World History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy