HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Letters From Readers — October 2006 American History Magazine

AH Issues  | 0 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

YOU CAN’T GET THERE FROM HERE
I am writing in response to the "History by the Numbers — America’s Highways" in the June issue of American History. In the paragraph mentioning the total miles of interstate highways, it lists Hawaii. I understand the political reasoning behind the so-called interstate highway on the island of Oahu, but is it correct to include it with actual interstate miles seeing as how it is not a true interstate? The last I knew, Hawaii was still an island thousands of miles from the mainland.

Amy Dubisz
Alpine, Wyo.

UNDULY PROMOTED
In the June issue story about the Interstate Highway System, Dwight D. Eisenhower is referred to as a lieutenant colonel in 1919. In fact, he was only an Army lieutenant, freshly graduated from West Point, and not to become a lieutenant colonel for another 20 years.

James DeFrancia
Aspen, Colo.

The editors reply: Eisenhower had the temporary rank of lieutenant colonel from October 14, 1918, to June 20, 1920, when he reverted to captain. He was promoted to major on July 2, 1920, and lieutenant colonel on July 1, 1936.

FINANCING DISCLOSED
As one of your subscribers and as a former staff member of the late U.S. Senator Albert Gore Sr., D-Tenn., I feel compelled to share with your other readers a more complete account of the creation of the Interstate Highway System than that which is provided in Logan Thomas Snyder’s "Broader Ribbons Across the Land," in your June issue.

Although it is true that President Eisenhower in February 1955 recommended the creation of a transcontinental highway system, the Interstate Highway System as we know it today was largely the product of Senator Gore, in his capacity as chairman of the Senate Committee on Public Works, and his very able administrative assistant, William G. Allen.

Senator Gore differed with Eisenhower primarily on how initial construction should be financed and on how ongoing maintenance should be funded. Congressional Republicans, with Eisenhower’s backing, wanted a $101 billion, 10-year program financed primarily by bonds, with state and local governments paying more than 70 percent of the cost. Gore foresaw that placing such a responsibility on state and local governments, especially those whose postwar economies were already financially strapped, would be both unrealistic and overly burdensome and that the result would be a crazy-quilt system of roadways, with well-constructed, well-maintained highways stopping at some state lines and giving way to poorly constructed, badly maintained roads in adjoining states.

Senator Gore favored federal funding of nearly 70 percent of the cost with an initial appropriation of $17.9 billion over five years. The balance would be paid for by increased gasoline taxes and levies on right-of-way purchases by gasoline stations and motels. Gore also favored the creation of a pay-as-you-go Highway Trust Fund, financed from special taxes on gasoline, diesel, tires and truck registrations, to ensure that proper maintenance of the entire system would not be reliant on the uncertainties of future governmental appropriations.

In May 1955, the U.S. Senate rejected the Eisenhower administration’s plan in favor of Gore’s. The negotiated result, which came a year later, was the Federal-Aid Highway Act, which reflected the financing and trust-fund features that were developed by Senator Gore and his assistant, Allen. Indeed, in recognition of the leadership provided by Senator Gore in crafting the final measure, Eisenhower gave instructions that the senator receive one of the two pens he had used to sign the landmark legislation into law on June 29, 1956.

Theodore Brown Jr.
Atlanta, Ga.

FULL SPEED AHEAD
I just finished reading the June issue of American History and thoroughly enjoyed it, as I always do. I wanted to point out a minor discrepancy in the "American Places" department, "New Mexico’s ‘Other’ Las Vegas." The writer made a reference to Theodore Roosevelt as being the secretary of the Navy. Actually, he was the assistant secretary of the Navy. The secretary was John D. Long.

Pages: 1 2

Tags:

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help