| |

Letters from Readers - June/July 2009 Military HistoryMH Issues | Single Page | 0 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post 'We were very proud we were cavalry pilots, on the front line, and that as cavalry Medevac pilots, we were picking up our own boys, no matter what.' Other Medevac Units in Vietnam The 1st Cavalry decided it wanted its own organic air rescue aircraft so as to: 1) have its own pilots, more familiar with air cavalry tactics; 2) to not have to call the 44th Medical Brigade and wait to get aircraft, when they might be available; and 3) to have air rescue aircraft at forward LZs close to the fighting. There were 12 aircraft in the platoon. Medevac aircraft carried a crew of five; Dustoff had four. We had only a small red cross with no white background on our ships and carried two M-60 machine guns for defense. Two Medevac birds each would be assigned to A, B and C Companies of the 15th Medical Battalion and directly supported each of the three combat brigades in the 1st Cavalry. We were very proud we were cavalry pilots, on the front line, and that as cavalry Medevac pilots, we were picking up our own boys, no matter what. I was a Medevac pilot in 1968 during the Tet Offensive, breaking the siege at Khe Sanh and going into the A Shau Valley. My two Purple Hearts and the six men we lost during that period attest to what Medevac meant to each of us and to the men on the ground in the 1st Cavalry. Art Jacobs Gone in 60 Seconds As a former Navy gunner's mate, I have had discussions with gunnery officers onboard various ships in Philadelphia that have the Phalanx system. The main problem, other than the fact that the system has only been tested under combat conditions once, is that there is no combat reload capability. You state that the entire ammunition load can be fired in less than 20 seconds. Others who work with this system say 60 seconds is the maximum sustained rate of fire. Once that is gone, there is no opportunity to reload under combat conditions due to the complexity of the gun. Perhaps this is why the gun is considered a close-in, last- ditch weapon system? One only has to read accounts of the Royal Navy's efforts to defend its ships from attacking Argentine aircraft during the Falklands War to see how feeble shipboard gunnery has become. The U.S. Navy has become enamored of high-tech missile and sensor systems at the expense of putting large amounts of steel on the incoming target. There is also the assumption that attacking aircraft or missiles will conveniently close their target one at a time. Tell that to the next ship that has multiple targets closing from as many different bearings and see how far the 60 seconds of fire from the Phalanx counts! Pages: 1 2Tags: Letters from Readers, Military History
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2010 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||