| |

Letters from Readers – Aug/Sept 2009 Military HistoryMH Issues | 2 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post What the writer omits is that the so-called ‘duly elected Republican government’ was supported—if not controlled—by the communist front, funded by the Soviet Union. Don’t take my word for it: Read George Orwell’s writings In Defense of Drake the Sea Dog Evan Dale Santos Bulletproof Ghost The prisoners were held in very bad conditions, and several of them died in captivity. The Second Duke of Westminster, when his armored cars were no longer of use on the Western Front, took his vehicles to Egypt and used them to rescue the Tara survivors by sweeping across the desert and killing several of the Senussi holding the crew captive, unfortunately killing several Senussi women and children in the process. The rescued crew confirmed that most of the neglect they had suffered was due to lack of resources rather than brutality. They were rescued on March 17, 1916. The Rolls-Royce armored cars then went east to assist the attacks in Palestine. Anthony James Israeli Warning Jerald C. Newman David Zabecki responds: In an article of such broad scope as the one on the Israel Defense Forces, there were many interesting points that simply could not be fit in because of space restrictions. As Newman notes, it is a fairly well-established fact that the Irgun telephoned a warning to British headquarters some time before the blast occurred, and for whatever reason the warning was ignored. It is also an irrelevant fact that in no way transfers the blame for the deaths that resulted in that blast from the Irgun to the victims themselves. The commanders that ordered the bombing and the Irgun fighters that carried out the attack committed an act of murder to advance a political agenda, which is by definition a terrorist act. Question of Loyalty Tags: Letters from Readers, Military History
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
2 Comments to “Letters from Readers – Aug/Sept 2009 Military History”
In the article Indomitable Afghanistan the author states, “. . . failed would-be conquerors have included Alexander the Great, . . .” however my understanding is that Alexander the Great did in fact conqueror Afghanistan. Although it did take him three years to do it, and although it did require a considerable portion of his small army to garrison it after he moved on to India, he left a stable province, through which he received reinforcements, and communications while he was in India. Almost alone among his conquered provinces Afghanistan never rose in revolt while he was alive. True by marrying the fabled Roxanne Alexander in effect allied himself with a local power, but it was one he had first defeated.
Thus, I think it would be much more accurate to state that Alexander stands alone as a success as a conqueror of Afghanistan. Other than this not at all small quibble I throughly enjoyed the extremely well written, and very topical article.
By john harrison on Jul 13, 2009 at 12:45 pm