| |

Letters from Readers - April 2009 American HistoryAH Issues| Drafts| Letters and Issues | Single Page | 2 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post The Whole Truth Michael Brown was a mulatto, which means that his father was almost certainly white. Wythe left his house and other property to Lydia, and half his bank stock to Michael. He also asked Thomas Jefferson to attend to Michael's "maintenance, education & other benefit," at the same time as Jefferson was arranging for his own children with Sally Hemings to learn professions by which they could support themselves outside of slavery. The issue of the magazine even includes an interview with historian Annette Gordon-Reed about the family life of Thomas Jefferson and the Hemingses of Monticello. It seems like a glaring omission not to mention the rumor about Brown being Wythe's son, even if you believe the rumor is false. Bruce Chadwick replies: Rumors have been repeated over the years that Michael Brown was Wythe's son, but I left them out of the article because they have no basis in fact. Investigations conducted by Wythe biographer Imogene Brown and two researchers from Colonial Williamsburg's Rockefeller Library have concluded that Wythe and Brown were not related. Wythe had no children with either of his wives, and the speculation was that he was sterile. Michael Brown was born around 1790, just after the death of Wythe's second wife, Elizabeth. Broadnax was given her freedom by Wythe in 1787, which meant that Michael would have been born free if he was her child. Yet Wythe referred to the teenage Michael as his "freed boy," meaning that he had been born a slave and later freed. According to both the Williamsburg and Richmond population records of that era, Lydia Broadnax had no children. Childless slave owners or those who lived with freedmen in Virginia often provided for them in their wills, as Wythe did. In addition, correspondence from people who knew Wythe never mentioned a relationship between him and Broadnax, other than that of employer and worker. Just because Thomas Jefferson had a relationship with a slave woman does not mean that George Wythe did too. No Comparison The editors reply: Tom Huntington's review quoted the book's author, Edwin Burrows, as saying, "I have refrained from drawing parallels to contemporary events, but I will not be sorry if readers find themselves thinking about Abu Ghraib and Guántanamo Bay." The Natives Are Restless Tags: American History
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2010 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
2 Comments to “Letters from Readers - April 2009 American History”
Just as one of the posters mentioned that Wythe was innocent of this charge Thomas Jefferson also is innocent of that Jefferson/Hemings charge. I worked with Dr Foster, DNA Study, and NOTHING proves TJ guilty, it is just a large agenda to be politiocally correct and the revise history.
Dr Foster tested a KNOWN carrier of Jefferson DNA as always believed by Eston Hemings (a Jefferson uncle or nephew), and YES, there would automatically be a match, and there was, but it was not THOMAS. Dr Fostyer did not inmform Nature of this as I had suggested. Dr Foster started the ball rolling, continued by Nature who nothing of other Jeffersons and finally Monticello had a biased and one sided study that further implicated Thomas.
Folks……….YOU ARE BEING CONNED from several quarters. See http://www.tjheritage.org and http://www.jeffersondna.com for full details.
Herb Barger
Jefferson Family Historian
Founder, Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society
By Herbert Barger on Mar 7, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Mr. Chadwick: With all respect, as a thinking, educated person and student of history, I must disagree with your conclusion that the persistent rumors that Lydia was Mr. Wythe's concubine and Michael his son "have no basis in fact." In your statement, you set forth that former/slaveholders often left bequests to their slaves. This simply is not so. Bequests were rare, and when done, fell far short of a stately home in the heart of exclusive Williamsburg and a promise of a first-rate education that Mr.Wythe left to these individuals. Moreover, it is a fact that Wythe made then President of the United States Thomas Jefferson executor of his will so that his wishes could be exectued. If this is not breathtaking confirmation of the veracity of these "rumors" I simply don't know what is. Also, to point to omissions in "correspondence from people who knew Whythe" as dispositive of the issue is laughable given 1.) Mr. Wythe's gilded standing in the community, 2.)the prevalence of these intimate relationships, and 3.) perhaps most importantly, the time-honored tradition of keeping such relationships private. After all, white men could have been sued for slander and slaves could have beaten or killed for speaking of such things. (Even today, there is a reluctance to do so.) Lastly, with regard to Michael's freedom, have you not considered that Virginia law would have required that Michael be expressly freed, despite being born to a free mother, since his mother resided and he was born in a slave-holding state? To not address these "rumors" in your text was a glaring omission. In so doing, you have denied the reading public a more robust understanding and discussion of colonial life and, in particular, a better understanding of why Mr. Sweeny felt that he had to resort to murder to claim the entire estate.
By Paul Troyer on Apr 10, 2009 at 1:52 am