| |

Letters From Readers – April 2008 World War IIWW2 Issues | 0 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post What’s Wrong with This Picture? My question pertains to page 71 of the December 2007 issue. Which general, Eisenhower or Marshall, is wearing his collar insignia reversed? Harry H. Clark Jr. According to David S. Stieghan, U.S. Army Infantry Branch Command Historian at Fort Benning, Georgia, they were probably both wrong. Officers of the rank of colonel and below wore their rank insignia on the right collar and branch insignia on the left. Because, then as now, general officers in the U.S. Army did not wear branch insignia, the block “U.S.” insignia was substituted. But general officers usually wore their rank stars on both collars when (as in this photograph) they wore tropical uniform without epaulets; they wore the “U.S.” device on both collars when they wore their stars on epaulets. But, as Stieghan notes, “These two were both four-star generals at the time and apparently were a law unto themselves.” The Blitz, Gone Ballistic Michael J. Neufeld says Wernher von Braun’s V-2 rocket was a “failure” (Conversation, December 2007), but having lived in London during the bombings, I can tell you that the V-2s were extremely frightening. You could not hear them coming. You could hear and see both the planes and the V-1s, as they had flames coming out the back, but the V-2 was a different kettle of fish. When the siren would go off at the start of a raid, most people went on about their business until the bombs got nearer and nearer, and then they would find shelter. My mother and I were out shopping one day during a raid when we heard a loud bang in the sky, and later found out that it was a V-2 breaking the sound barrier as it came down. Though it was never designed to hit a specific target the way today’s smart bombs do, the V-2 did tremendous damage and scared the daylights out of us all. Marion Steveson The Rescue of the USAT Dorchester The story of the four chaplains giving up their life jackets while the USAT Dorchester sank off of Greenland in 1943 has long been told at ceremonial events (War Letters, January/February 2008). A common problem with that story is the erroneous account of the Dorchester ’s rescue—or the complete omission of it. Some versions state that the three Coast Guard escort ships were unaware that the Dorchester had been torpedoed, or that the 904 men aboard were abandoned altogether. In fact, the sonar operator aboard USCGC Comanche heard the first torpedo that hit in the boiler room of the Dorchester . The USCGC Escanaba immediately turned to investigate and promptly began rescuing men from the frigid water, while USCGC Tampa began actions to drive the unseen U-boats down and shield the rescuing ship. Rescue swimmers wearing “survival suits” entered into the frigid water to attach lines to the victims, while men on cargo nets hauled the victims out of the water onto the two rescue ships. One rescuer who entered the water without a protective suit saved two men, losing his life in the process. USCGC Escanaba rescued 132 men and USCGC Comanche rescued 97 men; they were certainly not “abandoned” as is sometimes told. Capt. Donald M. Taub, USCG, Ret. One Soldier’s Story I just read the article “The Greatest Stories Ever Digitized” (Conversation, January/ February 2008) and it brought back a flood of memories. My father was a combat infantryman in the European theater. Unfortunately, he died in 2000, so he cannot participate personally in this worthwhile endeavor. However, I wanted to relate a few of the stories and experiences he shared with me. We often went to the movies together, and when we saw Saving Private Ryan , I asked him afterward if he found the combat scenes to be accurate—especially Spielberg’s famous beach assault sequence, since he landed on Omaha Beach himself shortly after D-Day. He told me that during that scene the sensation he recalled most vividly was the smell of thousands of fish rotting after being killed by the concussion of so many high explosives in the water. He never really cared for fish for as long as I knew him, and at that moment I realized why. Pages: 1 2
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||