Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Letter from Wild West - June 2012

By Gregory Lalire 
Originally published on HistoryNet.com. Published Online: March 30, 2012 
Print Friendly
3 comments FONT +  FONT -

Gunmen, Assassins and Drunk Murderers Are One Thing—Serial Killers Are Another
Although the line between the two can be as thin as a trigger finger

One Saturday I tuned in to the Western Channel to catch Stuart Whitman's Marshal Jim Crown catching outlaws in the Oklahoma Panhandle in 1888. The show, Cimarron Strip, didn't last long in the 1960s but holds up well, delivering a colorful look at one of the wildest spots on the closing frontier. On this particular morning, though, I got more than I bargained for in an episode called "Knife in the Darkness."

No, it wasn't a bowie knife, but there was darkness all right and enough haunting fog in Cimarron to make London jealous. One of the suspicious strangers in town was butchering women instead of steers, and Marshal Crown had to do what Scotland Yard had failed to do—nab serial killer Jack the Ripper. The ending has a nice frontier twist. I won't spoil it, but suffice it to say, American Indians also know how to use knives.

That unusual episode got me thinking: Were there actual serial killers in spurs? There's no easy answer. Experts disagree on the definition of "serial killer," a term not even coined until the mid-1970s. When "Saucy Jacky" (as the Ripper was also known) was killing London ladies for real in 1888, multiple homicides were rare. Not so in the 20th century, and the press started calling them "stranger murders," "mass murders" and "lust murders," until the term "serial murders" (the work of serial killers) caught on like personal computers. One 1990s definition of serial murder reads, "Three or more separate events in three or more separate locations with an emotional cooling-off period between homicides." Someone else suggested the three or more murders had to occur in "more than a 30-day period." A 2008 FBI definition reads, "The unlawful killing of two or more victims by the same offender(s), in separate events." Other definitions specify that these murders are not for material gain, are compulsive with sadistic, sexual overtones, are cyclical, are fulfilling psychologically and are committed by "monsters."

With that in mind, let's consider several Wild West man-killers (unlike the infamous Jack of London, they rarely killed women). Exhibit A is Texas gunman John Wesley Hardin, who might have notched 40 killings, many of which he recounted in his autobiography, The Life of John Wesley Hardin, as Written by Himself. A reprint today might bear the title J.W. Hardin: Confessions of a Serial Killer. But does he qualify? Certainly he killed multiple people in separate events, with some cooling-off periods between homicides. But this "monster" named for the founder of Methodism was intelligent, a family man and late in life an attorney. His prejudices, temper and consumption of red-eye just got the best of him at times…lots of times. A psychotic killer? No argument. A serial killer? Debatable.

Exhibit B is "Killin' Jim" Miller, who is said to have slain his grandparents and gone on to bushwhack perhaps as many men as Hardin. But also consider that he married, seemed like a good Methodist (thus his other nickname, "Deacon Jim"), served for a time as a lawman and then became a killer for hire (i.e., for material gain). Next up is boastful killer and liar Bill Longley, who sought even greater "success" than Hardin but failed. "Bloody Bill" later tried to disavow his boasts and also wondered why he was sentenced to the gallows while John Wesley only served prison time. In short, he was an overrated gunfighter who fell short as a "serial killer." Billy the Kid was a rustler who killed for revenge. Harvey Logan was a robber who killed for revenge or self-protection. Jesse James was a robber who might have killed only one man. Others killed because they were problem drinkers, not serial killers.

In this issue we present the "Bloody Benders," who kept Kansas bloody in the decade after the Civil War. You decide if they rate as serial killers. But consider that they owned an inn and were greedy. Maybe they only rate as the absolute lowest kind of Western entrepreneurs.


3 Responses to “Letter from Wild West - June 2012”


  1. 1
    Red Johnson says:

    Ironically, I can not find anywhere in the Wild West Magazine the "Letters to The Editor submissions are? How does one e-mail the editor to comment on articles, or in my case I would like to comment on Mr. Secrest picks for the "Wild West's Top 10" list.

    Someone please help!

    Red Johnson

    • 1.1
      Gerald Swick says:

      Readers can send letters to Wild West Editor, 19300 Promenade Dr., Leesburg, VA 20176 or e-mail them at WildWEst(at)weiderhistorygroup.com. Should include full name, home town and phone number (number is not for publication).

    • 1.2
      David Lauterborn says:

      Thank you, Gerald!

      Red, and other interested readers, you'll find this information at the end of the Letters section both online and in the print edition of every Wild West.

      We encourage you to write and look forward to hearing from you.

      Respectfully,
      Dave Lauterborn
      Managing Editor
      Wild West



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2013 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy