Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link World History Group RSS feed World History Group Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Letter from Wild West - April 2009

By Gregory Lalire 
Originally published on Published Online: January 30, 2009 
Print Friendly
1 comment FONT +  FONT -

The Search for Truth in The Searchers
Hollywood Westerns didn't get everything wrong

The Searchers, a 1956 Western epic directed by John Ford, was based on a novel by Alan Le May, whose story was inspired by actual events detailed in Gregory Michno's "The Search for the Captives of Elm Creek" in this issue. Last year Western Writers of America voted The Searchers the No. 1 Western of all time. Paul Hutton, WWA executive director, called the film "a dark and brooding commentary on the stain of American racism" in which John Wayne's Ethan Edwards is "a man driven by deathless hate and perverse racism to find and kill the lost child taken from his family by the Comanches." In the recent Weider History Group special issue 100 Greatest Westerns, the movie ranks No. 7, and reviewer Dennis Showalter comments, "Ethan's obsessive racism, amplified by its overt sexual dimension, makes him at best an uncomfortable character, much less a hero." As emotionally complex as the story is, it could have gone clear off the radar screen for 1950s complexity had Ethan been played by someone more closely resembling the historic Elm Creek Raid "searcher" who served as the model for Wayne's character. That historic searcher, Britt Johnson, was a black man.

"Johnson's tale is hard to document, leading a few historians to dismiss it as legend," says Texas author Scott Zesch, who is researching the man who was still technically a slave (though he acted as a ranch foreman for his white owner, Moses Johnson) when Comanche and Kiowa raiders killed his son Jim and captured his wife, Mary, and two of their other children. Zesch has found several eyewitness accounts about this black Texan who searched not only for his immediate family members but also for other captives (mixed race and white). Britt wished only the best for the captives he sought, which would make him more heroic—if not any less obsessed—than the fictional Ethan. After Kiowa raiders killed Johnson in 1871, an obituary described him as "noble hearted" and a "stranger to fear."

Perhaps it would have been too much to expect John Ford, best known for his cavalry trilogy (Fort Apache, She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, Rio Bravo) to cast a black man as the lead in The Searchers, though just four years later, Ford directed Sergeant Rutledge. Unsung black actor Woody Strode played the title character, a 9th Cavalry buffalo soldier accused of raping and killing a white woman. (That same year, 1960, Strode played the gladiator Draba in Spartacus.) At one point in The Searchers, several white women rescued from Indian captivity are shown to be half crazy. Ethan comments, "They were white—once." Had it been Strode instead of Wayne playing Ford's man on a mission, that line might have needed some adjusting, but either way the movie reflects a historical truth—Plains Indians often treated women captives harshly.

Hollywood Westerns, like John Ford himself, have usually shortchanged the perspective of native people looking East, but they cannot all be labeled "racist" anymore than they can all be called "historic hogwash." In Circle the Wagons: Attacks on Wagon Trains in History and Hollywood Films, author Michno argues: "In depicting the western migration, early Hollywood is the winner. During the first half-century, Hollywood nailed the concept." Later, he adds, Hollywood created white villains "more loathsome than any movie Indian had ever been." Michno then reminds us about some frontier realities: "Indians attacked wagon trains of any size; they killed people, sometimes mercilessly; wagon trains circled up for defense; Indians circled around wagon trains; and the Army did come to the rescue." Not always, of course. But today's Westerns, he stresses, should not necessarily be viewed as more accurate just because they express cynicism toward the optimistic notion of hardworking settlers and pale-faced men with guns "winning the West." No doubt there were racists in the Old West who weren't so different from Ethan Edwards, but it's too easy to forget that he is not representative of all Westerners; that there were also men of the West as unlike him, yet as similar to him, as Britt Johnson.

Gregory Lalire

One Response to “Letter from Wild West - April 2009”

  1. 1
    Charles H. Westgate III says:

    Everyone love to watch western on television and then movies in the movie theatres, and then on televisions. But the people didn't like to watch western. Becasue its was so much violence to watch. The Native American attacks are violence. And the gunfights between the cowboys, the bad guys, and the lawmens are violences. The Native American thought in their American inthe 1800s came here are evil who took over their lands and destroy it into ugly pieces. And that why the Naitve Americans attack them in racism adainst them are been prejudices to them as wells. But it was sad! But there sometime in Canada. There are no Indians (Native Americans) attack on Canadian
    Frontierland. Because who stop the attaqck of the racial Native American warriors and the bandits, the Mounties. To keep laws and orders in Canada from such violents and the Wild West is an ugly and horroibe eposide of America!

Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Related Articles

History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet? is brought to you by World History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
World History Group

World History Group Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2015 World History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy