Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link World History Group RSS feed World History Group Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Letter From MHQ - Winter 2008

Originally published on Published Online: November 02, 2007 
Print Friendly
2 comments FONT +  FONT -

A Cold War mystery may have been solved. After reading an advance copy of Ed Offley's new and intriguing Scorpion Down, a heartbreaking story about the 1968 destruction of a U.S. Navy nuclear attack submarine with the loss of all 99 crewmen, we asked him to write a feature article. The popular view of the Cold War has been a picture of a tense but generally peaceful four decades between the world's major powers, nations preferring to avoid direct confrontation with one another and only engaging in proxy armed conflicts.

Excepting the Korean and Vietnam wars, these contests were kept within well-understood bounds. With both East and West possessing awesome arsenals of mass destruction, careful and measured self-control stood to reason.

Offley, a tenacious, well seasoned, and military-savvy reporter of U.S. Defense Department activity, has written a tragic military reconnaissance tale. It fits in the category of peacetime subsurface surveillance, an activity that might include undersea communications cable tapping within some nation's territorial waters, close-range monitoring and recording of the unique propeller noise of an opponent's submarine or other such clandestine mission.

Peacetime aerial surveillance, another type of reconnaissance, might for example, include photo­graphic missions over a rival's homeland (See "The Truth About Overflights" MHQ Spring 1997) or identifying a potential opponent's radar sites and collection of electronic data—radar frequencies and the extent of his detection coverage.

During the Cold War, both peacetime subsurface and aerial reconnaissance could be hazardous. This was certainly true if the missions were carried out within a rival's territorial waters or over his homeland, but it was also dangerous in international waters or international airspace. During that period of global confrontation, twenty-three of the peacetime air surveillance flights performed by the U.S. armed forces resulted in the deaths of twenty-nine air crewmen and 150 more missing—the latter presumed dead.

Ironically, only one of the known deaths happened during a planned, intentional penetration of an adversary's airspace. Major Rudolf Anderson was killed and his U-2 reconnaissance aircraft destroyed in October 1962 over Cuba. The other flight casualties are believed to have involved American pilots under orders to avoid penetration of an opponent's airspace.

Below the surface, encounters could be dangerously intimate. About a dozen incidents of actual physical collisions between U.S. and Soviet submarines took place. In some of these cases, the subs were carrying nuclear tipped torpedoes or ballistic missiles—or maybe both. Any of these incidents could have provoked catastrophic results and disastrous retaliation.

Former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara often cites the Cuban Missile Crisis as the most perilous moment of the Cold War. Nevertheless, it was an event with only one combat casualty: Major Anderson. After reading Offley's story, you may wonder if the most perilous moment actually occurred some six years after the much-publicized U.S., Soviet and Cuban confrontation.

2 Responses to “Letter From MHQ - Winter 2008”

  1. 1
    George Kamburoff says:

    As I said on another note in this matter, I listened in realtime as this loss took place. It was traumatic, and had me screaming at the radio speakers.

    This article gives me closure after all those years of wondering why our government covered up the loss of US Servicemen in action against a perceived threat, robbing them and their families of such closure, and perhaps any additional benefits.

  2. 2
    Bruce Rule says:

    Sorry, George; the only way you could have listened to the acoustic detection of the SCORPION loss event in real time was to have been at the Columbia University Hydroacoustic Station, Canaries at 1900Z on 22 May 1968. No one at that station knew the event had occurred until they were requested to review their data days after the event occurred.

    The government covered up nothing about the loss of SCORPION.
    They may have recently ignored new information but they covered
    up nothing in 1968. Read my one-star review of Ed Offley's book SCORPION DOWN and go up on the SCORPION-99
    website for a few facts, something Offley never bothered to be concerned with.

    If you have a problem with this comment, contact me at

Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Related Articles

History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet? is brought to you by World History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
World History Group

World History Group Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2015 World History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy