HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Korean War: 1st Turkish Brigade’s Baptism of Fire

Military History  | 4 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

The Chinese and North Koreans used a multiple of tactics in a mountainous terrain that left little, if any, mobility. The weather had become an enemy as cruel as the terrain. The Turks and Americans, unable to communicate and coordinate, fought valiantly, but without much direction and without knowing what their fellow soldiers and units were doing.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Military History magazine

The U.N. response to the Chinese offensive in November 1950 has been described as a ‘bugout,’ a massive retreat that should not have happened. Very little has been written about the conditions that contributed to the failure of MacArthur’s November offensive, an offensive that began with high expectations of bringing the soldiers home for Christmas. Afterward, the words ‘home for Christmas’ rang hollow in the ears of both the military and the politicians. The terrain, the weather, the lack of adequate language skills by the Americans and the Turks, and the lack of options for that massive an operation preordained the bloody, tragic outcome.

In the course of the U.N. offensive and the Chinese counteroffensive, the 1st Turkish Brigade suffered 3,514 casualties, of which 741 were killed in action, 2,068 wounded, 163 missing and 244 taken prisoner, as well as 298 noncombatant casualties.

The Turks, armed and trained by American military advisers, did better than even they had hoped or expected in this, their first real combat since World War I. The American units to which they were attached respected their skills and tenacity in combat. Some comments by American officers give insight into the Turks and their abilities. ‘They really prefer to be on the offensive and handle it quite well,’ went one appraisal. ‘They are not as good at defensive positions, and certainly never retreat.’ Another report told of their patrol skills: ‘Certain Turkish patrols always reported high body counts when they returned from patrols. Headquarters always scoffed at the high numbers, much higher in fact than any other unit, until the Turks decided to bring the enemy bodies back and dump them at headquarters for the body count.’

The Turks acquitted themselves in a brave and noble fashion in some of the worst conditions experienced in the Korean War. Very little else could have been required or expected of them. Their heavy casualties speak of their honor and commitment. Their bravery requires no embellishment. It stands on its own.

This article was written by A.K. Starbuck and originally published in the December 1997 issue of Military History magazine.

For more great articles be sure to subscribe to Military History magazine today!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags: , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 4 Comments to “Korean War: 1st Turkish Brigade’s Baptism of Fire”

  2. I LOVE TURKS !!

    By Faysal on Jul 16, 2008 at 1:15 pm

  3. every Turk born as soldier

    By Kerem on Sep 15, 2008 at 10:29 am

  4. Turkish success in Korea was mostly because strong military traditions of Turkish army (some dating back to 2500 years). Most relevant ones to this battle are.

    1. Always expect that your supply line can be cut any moment and plan accordingly.
    2. No soldier is out of ammo as long as he has a bayonet and he knows how to use it.
    3. High initiative of low level commanders.
    4. Complete obedience of Turkish soldiers to their commanders.
    5. Never rely on intelligence coming from higher commands, always send strong patrols to every direction.

    By Ahmet Ilpars on Apr 21, 2009 at 11:29 am

  5. 5000 Turkish soldiers were sent to Korea, 740 of them were killed, over 300 POWs, 2800 wounded and missing.

    US left Turks alone against 15 000 Chinese soldiers in Kuneri battle. Turks werent aided, werent well equipped by US forces. That is the reason of high casualties of Turkish forces.

    By Zeki on May 27, 2009 at 8:41 am

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles




SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help