<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: King Edward I: England&#039;s Warrior King</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaq Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-781958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaq Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-781958</guid>
		<description>Since Edward II is known to have had at least two illegitimate children (aside from 4 children by Isabella of France), it&#039;s obvious that he had no qualms about sexual relations with women.  There are allegations of homosexuality in his relationship with Gaveston, and they may well be true, though there is no direct historical evidence to support any such claims.  Very probably, Edward II was bi-sexual.

As for Richard I, there is absolutely no evidence of homosexuality, and quite a bit more of heterosexuality, including a number of illegitimate children and a reputation for sleeping with women while on campaign.  The accusations of Richard&#039;s homosexuality stem mostly from a graduate thesis written by an Oxford historian in the 1950s, which sparked quite a bit of controversy and subsequently caught the attention of any number of authors and artists just as the sexual revolution was beginning to dawn and the view of traditional sexual roles were being challenged.  

People need to stop getting their history from the movies.

Finally, though the Crusades were a humiliating calamity for European armies (only the First Crusade achieved any notable success; the others were largely failures), they must be viewed in context of the religio-militarism of the late Dark Ages and early Medieval Period, and specifically as a reaction to the Islamic Crusades that conquered Spain and very nearly conquered Europe three centuries previously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Edward II is known to have had at least two illegitimate children (aside from 4 children by Isabella of France), it&#039;s obvious that he had no qualms about sexual relations with women.  There are allegations of homosexuality in his relationship with Gaveston, and they may well be true, though there is no direct historical evidence to support any such claims.  Very probably, Edward II was bi-sexual.</p>
<p>As for Richard I, there is absolutely no evidence of homosexuality, and quite a bit more of heterosexuality, including a number of illegitimate children and a reputation for sleeping with women while on campaign.  The accusations of Richard&#039;s homosexuality stem mostly from a graduate thesis written by an Oxford historian in the 1950s, which sparked quite a bit of controversy and subsequently caught the attention of any number of authors and artists just as the sexual revolution was beginning to dawn and the view of traditional sexual roles were being challenged.  </p>
<p>People need to stop getting their history from the movies.</p>
<p>Finally, though the Crusades were a humiliating calamity for European armies (only the First Crusade achieved any notable success; the others were largely failures), they must be viewed in context of the religio-militarism of the late Dark Ages and early Medieval Period, and specifically as a reaction to the Islamic Crusades that conquered Spain and very nearly conquered Europe three centuries previously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Douglas Kilcrease Plemons</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-780509</link>
		<dc:creator>John Douglas Kilcrease Plemons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-780509</guid>
		<description>I am a direct descendant of King Edward 1st and I am also a member of Clan Maclachlan. My Grandfathers fought against each other. Thank You for the complements and Khalid is correct. The Crusades were a failure and a waste of money. And not only was Edward the Second gay, Richard the Lion Heart was as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a direct descendant of King Edward 1st and I am also a member of Clan Maclachlan. My Grandfathers fought against each other. Thank You for the complements and Khalid is correct. The Crusades were a failure and a waste of money. And not only was Edward the Second gay, Richard the Lion Heart was as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward 1st Supporter</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-723813</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward 1st Supporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-723813</guid>
		<description>Long Live Edward 1st - the greatest of the Plantagent Kings -- and remember, Flush Hard - it is a long way to Scotland!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long Live Edward 1st &#8211; the greatest of the Plantagent Kings &#8212; and remember, Flush Hard &#8211; it is a long way to Scotland!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lalalaa</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-503586</link>
		<dc:creator>lalalaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-503586</guid>
		<description>woww , iim doing this project of him, he has alot of stuff on him!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woww , iim doing this project of him, he has alot of stuff on him!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaun grainger</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-446273</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun grainger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-446273</guid>
		<description>king edward 1 was a good king in hard times a great military tactition and leader. i dont agree with some of his decisions but he was fordging our empire and as a king in medievil times that must have been tough on everybody</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>king edward 1 was a good king in hard times a great military tactition and leader. i dont agree with some of his decisions but he was fordging our empire and as a king in medievil times that must have been tough on everybody</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Edwards and a Charles Were in a Boat</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-365983</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Edwards and a Charles Were in a Boat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-365983</guid>
		<description>[...] upon a time there was an Edward.  Edward was a King and he wanted some boats.  Edward fought many wars and wars can be very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] upon a time there was an Edward.  Edward was a King and he wanted some boats.  Edward fought many wars and wars can be very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew borrill</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-320587</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew borrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-320587</guid>
		<description>Edward I is a great king in my opinon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward I is a great king in my opinon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-305083</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-305083</guid>
		<description>hey peps king edward (dont know anything about him xx).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey peps king edward (dont know anything about him xx).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khalid</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-246327</link>
		<dc:creator>Khalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-246327</guid>
		<description>And edward certainly had more than a thousand men at his diposal. The combined force of crusaders, armenians, and mongols is said to have numbered 50,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And edward certainly had more than a thousand men at his diposal. The combined force of crusaders, armenians, and mongols is said to have numbered 50,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khalid</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/king-edward-i-englands-warrior-king.htm#comment-246312</link>
		<dc:creator>Khalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-246312</guid>
		<description>This is such bullshit. Edward was never able to defeat Baybars in a pitched battle despite having allied with the mongols. The ninth crusade was a Mamluk victory. Edward returned to his wretched island having accomplished nothing of importance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such bullshit. Edward was never able to defeat Baybars in a pitched battle despite having allied with the mongols. The ninth crusade was a Mamluk victory. Edward returned to his wretched island having accomplished nothing of importance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

