<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John C. Calhoun:  He Started the Civil War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-824277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-824277</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot, really helped for my project regarding Calhoun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot, really helped for my project regarding Calhoun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PostElectionNow</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-823796</link>
		<dc:creator>PostElectionNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-823796</guid>
		<description>There was quite a bit of discourse here on analogies between the ideologies of 1850 - 1860 and now.  For me, as a Southerner, my distinction from most Americans lays in the fact that I would rather be dead than lose my freedom.  Because of a $16 trillion national debt that is still climbing, I am now enslaved to a Federal government that wants to ignore my constitutional rights in order to pay for their greediness and irresponsibilities in the form of higher taxes, higher living costs, socialized medicine and an increasing welfare state.  As my taxes increase with ferocity in 2013, how is that different than the cotton tariffs of the 1800s which hammered the profitability of the plantations?  How is it morally proper for a Northerner of the 1850s to be profiting from those tariffs and the cotton goods, and then turn around and say that the slave labor that produced it was against Northern, anti-slave ideals.  I wish I could go back to 1870 and ask one of those slaves freed after the war how his new found freedom felt after the war ended.  Maybe he would tell me, &quot;We got nothing; we are hungry and sick because everything was pillaged or burned in the South and disease is rampant.&quot;  I expect to be called a racist, biggot, idiotic man because I am a Southerner and most people think I am still fighting the Civil War.  But maybe, just maybe, you need to consider that the history you learned in school was written by a biased author from the &quot;winning&quot; side.  I would suggest to you that the current war is not being fought at Antietam, Ft. Sumter, or Gettysburg, but rather economically between nations, and we have a totally incompetent commander-in-chief to lead us.  He reminds me so much of  General McClellan of the Army of the Potomac?  Maybe if so many Americans were not so insular and lived in other countries for awhile, we would not be so short-sighted in our thinking here at home.  As a Southerner, I learned one thing about losing something big, and that was to be prepared the next time around.  We started preparing by never fully disarming at Appomattox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was quite a bit of discourse here on analogies between the ideologies of 1850 &#8211; 1860 and now.  For me, as a Southerner, my distinction from most Americans lays in the fact that I would rather be dead than lose my freedom.  Because of a $16 trillion national debt that is still climbing, I am now enslaved to a Federal government that wants to ignore my constitutional rights in order to pay for their greediness and irresponsibilities in the form of higher taxes, higher living costs, socialized medicine and an increasing welfare state.  As my taxes increase with ferocity in 2013, how is that different than the cotton tariffs of the 1800s which hammered the profitability of the plantations?  How is it morally proper for a Northerner of the 1850s to be profiting from those tariffs and the cotton goods, and then turn around and say that the slave labor that produced it was against Northern, anti-slave ideals.  I wish I could go back to 1870 and ask one of those slaves freed after the war how his new found freedom felt after the war ended.  Maybe he would tell me, &#034;We got nothing; we are hungry and sick because everything was pillaged or burned in the South and disease is rampant.&#034;  I expect to be called a racist, biggot, idiotic man because I am a Southerner and most people think I am still fighting the Civil War.  But maybe, just maybe, you need to consider that the history you learned in school was written by a biased author from the &#034;winning&#034; side.  I would suggest to you that the current war is not being fought at Antietam, Ft. Sumter, or Gettysburg, but rather economically between nations, and we have a totally incompetent commander-in-chief to lead us.  He reminds me so much of  General McClellan of the Army of the Potomac?  Maybe if so many Americans were not so insular and lived in other countries for awhile, we would not be so short-sighted in our thinking here at home.  As a Southerner, I learned one thing about losing something big, and that was to be prepared the next time around.  We started preparing by never fully disarming at Appomattox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals can't break 200-year racism habit - Page 2 - Shooting Sports Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-820219</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals can't break 200-year racism habit - Page 2 - Shooting Sports Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-820219</guid>
		<description>[...] but there is in his doctrines.&#039; A decade later, a bloody civil war would prove Benton was right.    John C. Calhoun: He Started the Civil War &#124; Civil War Times Magazine   __________________ What are Mitt&#039;s tax returns [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but there is in his doctrines.&#039; A decade later, a bloody civil war would prove Benton was right.    John C. Calhoun: He Started the Civil War | Civil War Times Magazine   __________________ What are Mitt&#039;s tax returns [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Gallo</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-818188</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Gallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-818188</guid>
		<description>Check it out my man. The first slave owner in American colonies was a black man from Angola named Anthony Johnson.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist)
You should read some history before shooting your mouth off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check it out my man. The first slave owner in American colonies was a black man from Angola named Anthony Johnson.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist)</a><br />
You should read some history before shooting your mouth off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-815887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-815887</guid>
		<description>The abolotionist movement was trying to liberate a people who was raped, pillaged, murdered, and enslaved by the south, the abolotionists AND John Brown were right, those effing southerners deserved to die by his hand, the South built its strengths on the backs of slaves! The union, abolotionists, and good ol&#039; Lincoln were right, they were fighting for a raped race&#039;s freedom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The abolotionist movement was trying to liberate a people who was raped, pillaged, murdered, and enslaved by the south, the abolotionists AND John Brown were right, those effing southerners deserved to die by his hand, the South built its strengths on the backs of slaves! The union, abolotionists, and good ol&#039; Lincoln were right, they were fighting for a raped race&#039;s freedom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-813855</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 04:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-813855</guid>
		<description>What a hack job on Calhoun&#039;s letter to Virgil Maxcy. The author changed the meaning of the letter by cherry picking certain parts of it to mean something it didn&#039;t. Here is the quote unedited. Notice he&#039;s stating that slavery, the soil and climate, and an agricultural export economy have placed the South in opposite relations with the rest of the Union IN REGARDS TO TAXATION AND APPROPRIATIONS.

Dishonest historians!

I consider the Tariff but as the occasion, rather than the real cause of the present unhappy state of things. The truth can no longer be disguised, that the peculiar domestick institution of the Southern States, and the consequent direction, which that and her soil and climate have given to her industry, has placed them in regard to taxation and appropriations in opposite relation to the majority of the Union, against the danger of which, if there be no protective power in the reserved rights of the States, they must in the end be forced to rebel, or submit to have their paramount interests sacrificed, their domestick institutions subordinated by Colonization and other schemes, and themselves &amp; children reduced to wretchedness. Thus situated, the denial of the right of the State to interfere constitutionally in the last resort, more alarms the thinking, than all other causes; and however strange it may appear, the more universally the State is condemned, and her right denied, the more resolute she is to assert her constitutional powers lest the neglect to assert should be considered a practical abandonment of them, under such circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a hack job on Calhoun&#039;s letter to Virgil Maxcy. The author changed the meaning of the letter by cherry picking certain parts of it to mean something it didn&#039;t. Here is the quote unedited. Notice he&#039;s stating that slavery, the soil and climate, and an agricultural export economy have placed the South in opposite relations with the rest of the Union IN REGARDS TO TAXATION AND APPROPRIATIONS.</p>
<p>Dishonest historians!</p>
<p>I consider the Tariff but as the occasion, rather than the real cause of the present unhappy state of things. The truth can no longer be disguised, that the peculiar domestick institution of the Southern States, and the consequent direction, which that and her soil and climate have given to her industry, has placed them in regard to taxation and appropriations in opposite relation to the majority of the Union, against the danger of which, if there be no protective power in the reserved rights of the States, they must in the end be forced to rebel, or submit to have their paramount interests sacrificed, their domestick institutions subordinated by Colonization and other schemes, and themselves &amp; children reduced to wretchedness. Thus situated, the denial of the right of the State to interfere constitutionally in the last resort, more alarms the thinking, than all other causes; and however strange it may appear, the more universally the State is condemned, and her right denied, the more resolute she is to assert her constitutional powers lest the neglect to assert should be considered a practical abandonment of them, under such circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakota</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-796610</link>
		<dc:creator>dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-796610</guid>
		<description>cool man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakota</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-796609</link>
		<dc:creator>dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-796609</guid>
		<description>ok</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILD_Drama_Queen</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-796551</link>
		<dc:creator>WILD_Drama_Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-796551</guid>
		<description>yes Rufus, Bishop was only expressing his point in the matter. please calm your hormones. XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes Rufus, Bishop was only expressing his point in the matter. please calm your hormones. XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILD_Drama_Queen</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/john-c-calhoun-he-started-the-civil-war.htm#comment-796550</link>
		<dc:creator>WILD_Drama_Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-796550</guid>
		<description>@Rufus.. Many people are racist. just because the war was fought and done with it does not mean that racisim does not exist any more. People hate Obama because he is black. Others hate him because he is considered to be wrong in his dicision making. but i do not agree with your statement saying,&quot;...hate for PRESIDENT OBAMA is a waste of time and energy&quot;. i feel this is wrong because for 1.  his actions can cause people to vote him out of office since they dont like him. and 2. it is not a waste of energy b/c when people express their opinion, the government would maybe realize what is happening and do what is good for the country and the citizens. but on one term i do agree... if people hate him only b/c of his ethnicity then it is a waste of time and energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rufus.. Many people are racist. just because the war was fought and done with it does not mean that racisim does not exist any more. People hate Obama because he is black. Others hate him because he is considered to be wrong in his dicision making. but i do not agree with your statement saying,&#034;&#8230;hate for PRESIDENT OBAMA is a waste of time and energy&#034;. i feel this is wrong because for 1.  his actions can cause people to vote him out of office since they dont like him. and 2. it is not a waste of energy b/c when people express their opinion, the government would maybe realize what is happening and do what is good for the country and the citizens. but on one term i do agree&#8230; if people hate him only b/c of his ethnicity then it is a waste of time and energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
