HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

J.E.B. Stuart: Battle of Gettysburg Scapegoat

America's Civil War  | 6 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

With Lee’s and Longstreet’s rather vague advice in hand, Stuart turned to his most trusted scout, John Singleton Mosby, for information on the best route to take into Pennsylvania. Mosby, who would later find fame as the commanding colonel of an effective independent cavalry unit in northern Virginia, Mosby’s Rangers, was still serving on Stuart’s personal staff. He rode into headquarters on June 23 with word that Stuart could pass safely around the rear of Hooker’s widely dispersed army in western Maryland en route to Pennsylvania. Hooker, said Mosby, was lying idle along a 25-mile-long line from Leesburg, Va., to Thoroughfare Gap, just west of Haymarket, and the Federal line was stretched so thin that Stuart could simply ride through it. It was a dangerously overoptimistic assessment of the military situation, based on the assumption that the Federals would simply sit still and wait for events to overtake them. But Stuart trusted Mosby implicitly and was, at any rate, always ready to accept information that conformed to his own expectations.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to America's Civil War magazine

Stuart liked the plan so well that he committed it to paper and showed it to the commanders of his two brigades, Brig. Gens. Fitzhugh Lee and Wade Hampton. He then detailed his strategy to Lee and Longstreet. Stuart’s plan called for him to pass through Glasscock Gap, then head northeast, crossing the Potomac at Seneca Ford and joining Ewell in Pennsylvania. Stuart fully expected his cavalry to pass to the rear of the Union army, severing communications between Hooker and his own cavalry commander, Brig. Gen. Alfred Pleasonton, destroying transportation for the Union army, and taking pressure off Lee by creating a diversion and slowing down Hooker’s movements. Once in Maryland, Stuart would wreck the C&O Canal and destroy railroad communications with Washington.

Stuart went to army headquarters at Berryville to await Lee’s approval of his plan. He was sleeping out in the open under a poncho when Lee’s response arrived. Stuart’s adjutant, Major Henry McClellan, opened the letter (clearly marked confidential) and woke Stuart to show him the message. Lee had written: If General Hooker’s army remains inactive, you can leave two brigades to watch him, and withdraw with the three others, but should he not appear to be moving northward, I think you had better withdraw this side of the mountain tomorrow night, cross at Shepherdstown next day and move to Fredericktown [Frederick]. You will, however, be able to judge whether you can pass around their army without hindrance, doing them all the damage you can, and cross the river east of the mountains. In either case, after crossing the river, you must move on and feel the right of Ewell’s troops, collecting information, provisions, etc. Give instructions to the commander of the brigades left behind to watch the flank and rear of the army and (in event of the enemy leaving their front) retire from the mountains west of the Shenandoah, leaving sufficient pickets to guard the passes, and bringing everything clean along the valley, closing upon the rear of the army.

The second letter from Lee was ambiguous and somewhat illogical, especially when considering his first letter. Initially, Lee had told Stuart he was concerned that Hooker might steal a march on us and get across the Potomac before we are aware. His first set of instructions ordered Stuart to link up with Ewell’s right and guard his flank, while also collect[ing] all the supplies you can for the use of the army. That in itself was a rather contradictory order, especially for a cavalryman famous for his independent raiding sorties.

The second letter told Stuart he could move if General Hooker’s army remains inactive [emphasis added] and simultaneously advised Stuart to enter Maryland west of the Blue Ridge Mountains or pass around the Federals east of the mountains and then feel the right of Ewell’s troops. Besides giving Stuart two dramatically different routes to take, Lee had softened the stipulation that the cavalry link up with Ewell and guard his flank. And his remark that Stuart should do as much damage as possible seemed to be directed more at a raiding party than a flank-guarding detail. Lee also gave Stuart the latitude to judge whether he could pass around their army without hindrance. It would be up to Stuart to decide what constituted a true hindrance, as opposed to a momentary complication.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Tags: , , , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 6 Comments to “J.E.B. Stuart: Battle of Gettysburg Scapegoat”

  2. A long article that misses the point. The first, and foremost decision in a battle is the ground upon which it is to be fought. For some reason, one must always justify Lee’s blunder. The truth is, Lee’s success prior to Gettysburg was mainly due to the strategic decisions recommended by Jackson. Check the battle history of the Confederates, pre and post Gettysburg.

    Lee was a mild mannered, extreme egotist, and this was reflected at Gettysburg. Longstreet had it correct, re-deploy the army and select the ground upon which to fight. The significant battles of the Gettysburg campaign
    were fought on the worst possible terrain for the Confederates, and Lee made all those battle decisions.

    The question is raised: Was lee really the great general of the southern forces?

    By DENNIS MILAM on Sep 17, 2008 at 6:57 am

  3. Lee was a great General, just as their are great college football coaches. However, anytime one is a great college head coach, watch how quickly his offensive and defensive cordinators move on to be HEAD COACHES?

    Lee had a “Loose” management style, undestanding that great Generals like Jackson and Longstreet performed best when NOT micromanaged, and allowed to utilize their critical thinking skills.(And prior to Gettysburg it was a perfect style.)………..Lee assumed that other Generals did not need exacts, and details as well?….But, some did……And Gettysburg was where it surfaced….On both sides, according to all military’s of the world studdying the War of Northern Agression, all are in agreement that Stonewall Jackson’s mind to military tactics, was as Einstein was to physics!…………But, Lee was still a magnificent field commander.

    By roho on Jan 30, 2009 at 4:13 pm

  4. Stuart was not the scapegoat—Custer was the hero at Gettesburg..plain and simple. Lee’s battle plan on the thrid day was wonderful–but it was spoiled by one George Armstrong Custer. The East Calvery Battelfield was the key to victory, and the North won that battle thus keeping Stuart from carrying out his mission. If Stuart could have made it into the rear of the Meade with his 5800 horsemen, then Pickett’s charge would not have been in vain. Study the battle–you will see the truth.

    By albert sewell on Feb 17, 2009 at 9:26 am

  5. General Lee’s army won battle after battle against federal troops who were led by less than stellar generals. Did General Lee get the idea his army was invincible? I tend to think so. Would the Battle of Gettysburg have a different outcome if he had listened more to his generals? I think so. The loss of General Jackson was also a factor at Gettysburg.

    By Denzil Minyard on Oct 31, 2009 at 11:07 pm

  1. 2 Trackback(s)

  2. May 31, 2008: Dealing in grace · Altitude
  3. May 30, 2009: Blog #10 - Most decisive factor at Gettysburg | Groves Civil War Blog

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help