http://www.historynet.com/interview-with-fetterman-fight-author-john-monnett.htm From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:31:52 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.historynet.com/interview-with-fetterman-fight-author-john-monnett.htm/comment-page-1#comment-139775 Joe Kelly Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:39:34 +0000 http://www.historynet.com/?p=13680980#comment-139775 Its a massacre because in EVERY battle that the Indians won and held the field they MURDERED all the wounded soldiers. In EVERY battle the army held the field prisoners were taken. Its a massacre because in EVERY battle that the Indians won and held the field they MURDERED all the wounded soldiers. In EVERY battle the army held the field prisoners were taken.

]]> http://www.historynet.com/interview-with-fetterman-fight-author-john-monnett.htm/comment-page-1#comment-125251 Marshall Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:49:00 +0000 http://www.historynet.com/?p=13680980#comment-125251 I have one big question. Why is it that when the Army kill all the Indians in a battle it's called a "massacre", but when the Indians kill all the soldiers it's called a "fight"? Isn't that a double standard? I have one big question. Why is it that when the Army kill all the Indians in a battle it’s called a “massacre”, but when the Indians kill all the soldiers it’s called a “fight”? Isn’t that a double standard?

]]>