| |

Intercepted Communications for Field Marshal Erwin RommelWorld War II | 3 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post
On December 7, 1941, Rommel’s Panzergruppe Afrika followed initial successes with a long retreat from near Tobruk west and south across Libya’s Cyrenaica to Tripolitania. There, the German and Italian units regrouped. There, also, beginning on December 18, the Desert Fox studied Fellers’ detailed reports, along with local intercepts. The latter came from his second secret ear in the enemy’s communications, his own 621st Signals Battalion mobile monitoring element commanded by Hauptmann Alfred Seeböhm. The British not only failed to frequently change their codes during this period but also displayed an unbelievable lack of battlefield radio discipline. According to Rommel’s chief of staff, they ‘were quite broad-minded in making speeches during combat, and we had the possibility of making important conclusions from their speeches.’ On January 21, 1942, aided by intercepts telling him he had temporary front-line armored superiority, the Desert Fox launched an offensive–advancing an impressive 300 miles in just 17 days. Subscribe Today
Die gute Quelle kept pace with the advance of Rommel’s forces, now elevated to Panzerarmee status, along Libya’s northeastern shore. On January 29, for example, Rommel received a full summary of British armored strength. Then he learned that more effective American-made M3 medium tanks would enter combat after mid-February. On February 6 the intercepts detailed, in addition to unit locations, the establishment of a heavily mined British defense line stretching from Gazala on the sea to the oasis at Bir Hacheim. From that line, the British intended to launch a decisive counteroffensive. With his 560 tanks (including 240 obsolete Italian ones) against his opponent’s 700, Rommel pre-empted the Allies by unleashing a daring assault on May 26. His main force swept south parallel to the defense line, swung east around its Free Frenchheld anchor at Bir Hacheim and then pivoted back north against the British positions.
Axis momentum slowed as supplies dwindled, due mainly to an overextended and inadequate logistical system. The key to British success in interdicting the Axis’ Mediterranean convoys was the island of Malta, situated just west of the principal Axis sea lane. German and Italian aircraft pounded the little island, dropping some 9,000 tons of bombs during a two-month period. Fellers’ cables made only too clear the island’s perilous position and predicted its surrender if the bombardment continued and supply convoys failed to reach it.
In June, the British decided to sail two convoys simultaneously from Alexandria in the east and Gibraltar in the west, respectively code-named Vigorious and Harpoon, in a full-scale attempt to relieve Malta. A vital part of the operation was the neutralization of Axis ships and aircraft. Toward this end, air raids were scheduled against key enemy bases. In addition, numerous airfields would be attacked by parachute and ground elements to destroy bombers before they could be flown against the convoys. Fellers efficiently reported this. His cable, No. 11119 dated June 11, was intercepted in both Rome and Lauf. It read, in part: ‘NIGHTS OF JUNE 12TH JUNE 13TH BRITISH SABOTAGE UNITS PLAN SIMULTANEOUS STICKER BOMB ATTACKS AGAINST AIRCRAFT ON 9 AXIS AIRDROMES. PLANS TO REACH OBJECTIVES BY PARACHUTES AND LONG RANGE DESERT PATROL.’ British and Free French raiders went into action behind the lines in Libya and on the island of Crete. At most bases, they were slaughtered. There was success only where Fellers’ unwitting early warning was not received, was ignored or was ineptly handled.
Operation Harpoon’s six merchantmen and their escorts were continually beset by Axis air and surface attacks between June 14 and 16. Only two cargo ships reached Malta. Vigorous, the larger eastern convoy, including 11 merchant ships, incurred serious losses before turning back to Egypt. Pages: 1 2 3 4Tags: 20th - 21st Century, Historical Conflicts, World War II
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
3 Comments to “Intercepted Communications for Field Marshal Erwin Rommel”
My name is Mary Louise De Graux, I am the daughter of Andrew De Graux, who work as agents in the Division of Military Intelligence in the War Department, according Certifications CK Nuls, Lieut.Col.General Staff, in the Executive Officer in the Office of the Chief Staff, in Washington, on Februry 26, 1934, also according to certification of Second Endosement, dated Februry 20.1934, signed by James M. Hobson. Lt.Col.Retired, where he was certified as “a valuable agent”, there is also a certificate signed by Albert L. Loustal ot, Colonel (ACC) GSC, Military Attache and a previous certification with FIM illegible, said that American Minister, 3.1920 of May, these certifications evidence that Andrew De Graux, valuable work as agents for the Division of Military Intelligence USA at the American Embassy in Havana – Cuba.
I asked her daughter to this division the record of my father, because I want to know their history, within the government of his country (my country), so it agradecere to this division is possible that if I EMVI copies of such record and any information In relation to Andrew Graux
By Mary Louise De Graux on Aug 14, 2008 at 10:08 am
I am the researcher who wrote the trackbacked article above. I came across a German translation of a report by Fellers in the NARA files of the German Admiral at the Supreme Command of the Italian Navy. The report bears out what was written in the article – Fellers unwittingly provided exceptional quality of information to the Axis, and his reports were very glum reading. You can read the re-translated into English report by Fellers at this link:
http://crusaderproject.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/the-good-source/
I believe it is the only full Fellers report that is available on the internet.
With kind regards
Andreas
By Andreas on Jul 15, 2009 at 4:22 am