<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Henry VII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael deauchamp</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-983728</link>
		<dc:creator>michael deauchamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-983728</guid>
		<description>I HAVE STUDIED THE DETAILS OF THE PRINCES SAGA, AND IN MY 
OPINION HENRY VII WOULD HAVE BENIFIETED MOST BY THEIR
CONVIENIENT DISAPPEARENCE, NOT RICHARD11, HENRY V111
SHOWS HOW HIS FATHER NATURE SHAPED HIS OWN. MJD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE STUDIED THE DETAILS OF THE PRINCES SAGA, AND IN MY<br />
OPINION HENRY VII WOULD HAVE BENIFIETED MOST BY THEIR<br />
CONVIENIENT DISAPPEARENCE, NOT RICHARD11, HENRY V111<br />
SHOWS HOW HIS FATHER NATURE SHAPED HIS OWN. MJD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Hennasy</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-838199</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare Hennasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-838199</guid>
		<description>It was and still is with some parents to name their first born child after their mother of father or a grand-parent.
So, why did-not Henry the 7th name his first son Henry?; yet the first name Henry was given to his second son.
There is no-doubt the reason why he named his first son Arthur, because if he had not died young and had out-lived his father he would have become King Arthur. But, would he have been known as King Arthur the 1st. or King Arthur the 2nd., indeed the so-called first King Arthur being only a legend.- How ridiculous things would become with that Tudor-dynasty, !.

Clare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was and still is with some parents to name their first born child after their mother of father or a grand-parent.<br />
So, why did-not Henry the 7th name his first son Henry?; yet the first name Henry was given to his second son.<br />
There is no-doubt the reason why he named his first son Arthur, because if he had not died young and had out-lived his father he would have become King Arthur. But, would he have been known as King Arthur the 1st. or King Arthur the 2nd., indeed the so-called first King Arthur being only a legend.- How ridiculous things would become with that Tudor-dynasty, !.</p>
<p>Clare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-780382</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-780382</guid>
		<description>Some &quot;adult-boys&quot; never grown-up. They dress-up has Arthur&#039;s &quot;make-belief&quot; knights and apart from they &quot;Lancing A Lot&quot; they are also just a bunch of &quot;W_nk A Lots&quot;,!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some &#034;adult-boys&#034; never grown-up. They dress-up has Arthur&#039;s &#034;make-belief&#034; knights and apart from they &#034;Lancing A Lot&#034; they are also just a bunch of &#034;W_nk A Lots&#034;,!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-780366</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 07:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-780366</guid>
		<description>Regarding the deceiving Round Table and Arthurian legends:

The name Lancelot became popular after these Arthurian stories were written but most who have the name mainly just want to be called Lance for short.
The person who invented the name must have thought it was amusing because when knights are frequently jousting on horseback the are &quot;LANCING A LOT&quot;, !.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the deceiving Round Table and Arthurian legends:</p>
<p>The name Lancelot became popular after these Arthurian stories were written but most who have the name mainly just want to be called Lance for short.<br />
The person who invented the name must have thought it was amusing because when knights are frequently jousting on horseback the are &#034;LANCING A LOT&#034;, !.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-779186</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-779186</guid>
		<description>Henry-Tudor&#039;s grand-daughter? Elizabeth:
Queen Elizabeth the lst may have had mixed doubts about her own origin and what the people were thinking of her at the time of her Coronation because her own mother Anne Boleyn had been killed by Henry the 8th for treason, this including adultery with other people, Henry the 8th before his demise being nicknamed &quot;Harry the Spouse Killer&quot; by some northern gentry. However, this king had to find excuses to get rid of wives because he was not allowed to divorce until he became supportive of the Reformation and made &quot;The Head of The Church of England&quot;. His main interest was to have a son to become king.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry-Tudor&#039;s grand-daughter? Elizabeth:<br />
Queen Elizabeth the lst may have had mixed doubts about her own origin and what the people were thinking of her at the time of her Coronation because her own mother Anne Boleyn had been killed by Henry the 8th for treason, this including adultery with other people, Henry the 8th before his demise being nicknamed &#034;Harry the Spouse Killer&#034; by some northern gentry. However, this king had to find excuses to get rid of wives because he was not allowed to divorce until he became supportive of the Reformation and made &#034;The Head of The Church of England&#034;. His main interest was to have a son to become king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-779181</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 07:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-779181</guid>
		<description>Some history is written and also rewritten by supporters of the winners of a conflict and later historians if not careful can repeat it. So, did some history happen the way we think or should we just say &quot;perhaps&quot;.
If Prince Arthur had lived to become king the Arthurian legends would have gained a more false acceptance, this part of the Tudor supporters intention to overshadow and demoralise the earlier dynasty.
To findout more about history before the Tudor period, we must try and locate more pre-c.1485 documentation, it there is a survival of it,!.
.............
Sarah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some history is written and also rewritten by supporters of the winners of a conflict and later historians if not careful can repeat it. So, did some history happen the way we think or should we just say &#034;perhaps&#034;.<br />
If Prince Arthur had lived to become king the Arthurian legends would have gained a more false acceptance, this part of the Tudor supporters intention to overshadow and demoralise the earlier dynasty.<br />
To findout more about history before the Tudor period, we must try and locate more pre-c.1485 documentation, it there is a survival of it,!.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
Sarah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: June</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-778928</link>
		<dc:creator>June</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-778928</guid>
		<description>The biggest predicament for Henry-Tudor would be for the 2 Princes in the Tower of London to be still alive when he made himself King, making note that King Richard the 3rd had been made Lord-Protector and then King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest predicament for Henry-Tudor would be for the 2 Princes in the Tower of London to be still alive when he made himself King, making note that King Richard the 3rd had been made Lord-Protector and then King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-319926</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-319926</guid>
		<description>My fruitless attempts to find a specific BBC production (DVD), about &#039;Henry the VII&#039;, called &quot;The Shadow of the Tower&quot; has been a long two years. I&#039;m certain it&#039;s out there because there is a VHS version on e-bay. This series/movie circa. 1970-71 preceeded another BBC produced &quot;The Six wives on Henry the VIII&quot;, and then &quot;Elizabeth R&quot; followed. &quot;The Shadow of the Tower&quot; is the story is about Henry VII paranoid early reign due to Perkin Wurbeck or (Worbeck) and a few others claiming to be one of the &#039;Princes&#039; in the Tower. Therefore, making claim to be the rightful king. 

If anyone other than HistoryNet Staff ..... knows, where or if it can be found, please be so kind as to leave a post here, i&#039;ll be sure to check back. It would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My fruitless attempts to find a specific BBC production (DVD), about &#039;Henry the VII&#039;, called &#034;The Shadow of the Tower&#034; has been a long two years. I&#039;m certain it&#039;s out there because there is a VHS version on e-bay. This series/movie circa. 1970-71 preceeded another BBC produced &#034;The Six wives on Henry the VIII&#034;, and then &#034;Elizabeth R&#034; followed. &#034;The Shadow of the Tower&#034; is the story is about Henry VII paranoid early reign due to Perkin Wurbeck or (Worbeck) and a few others claiming to be one of the &#039;Princes&#039; in the Tower. Therefore, making claim to be the rightful king. </p>
<p>If anyone other than HistoryNet Staff &#8230;.. knows, where or if it can be found, please be so kind as to leave a post here, i&#039;ll be sure to check back. It would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.Briggs.</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-288530</link>
		<dc:creator>D.Briggs.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 13:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-288530</guid>
		<description>My earlier posting was not in full?. I agree with postings by Raymond E.O.Ella and anyone who is interested in them can soon find supportive evidence regarding a certain table that is only &#039;attributed &#039; to a legend and Tudor propaganda.

Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My earlier posting was not in full?. I agree with postings by Raymond E.O.Ella and anyone who is interested in them can soon find supportive evidence regarding a certain table that is only &#039;attributed &#039; to a legend and Tudor propaganda.</p>
<p>Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.Briggs.</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/henry-vii.htm#comment-288464</link>
		<dc:creator>D.Briggs.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 11:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-288464</guid>
		<description>z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
