<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hannah Pakula: A Biographer Traces the Rise of Madame Chiang Kai-shek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/hannah-pakula-a-biographer-traces-the-rise-of-madame-chiang-kai-shek.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/hannah-pakula-a-biographer-traces-the-rise-of-madame-chiang-kai-shek.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:44:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Kincade</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/hannah-pakula-a-biographer-traces-the-rise-of-madame-chiang-kai-shek.htm#comment-358075</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Kincade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681551#comment-358075</guid>
		<description>On Page 366, the author states that the Nazi-Soviet nonaggression pact was signed on August 23, 1941, leaving Japan &quot;out in the cold.&quot; Not true!
The Nazi-Soviet Pact was signed in 1939, not 1941.

I suspect the author is talking about the Japanese-Soviet Neutrality Pact which Japan considered rejecting following Hitler&#039;s invasion of the USSR in July of  1941. The Japanese decided to maintain the Neutrality Pact and move south instead.

China, which had been wanting a Soviet declaration of war against Japan was thus &quot;left in the cold.&quot;

Right, or wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Page 366, the author states that the Nazi-Soviet nonaggression pact was signed on August 23, 1941, leaving Japan &#034;out in the cold.&#034; Not true!<br />
The Nazi-Soviet Pact was signed in 1939, not 1941.</p>
<p>I suspect the author is talking about the Japanese-Soviet Neutrality Pact which Japan considered rejecting following Hitler&#039;s invasion of the USSR in July of  1941. The Japanese decided to maintain the Neutrality Pact and move south instead.</p>
<p>China, which had been wanting a Soviet declaration of war against Japan was thus &#034;left in the cold.&#034;</p>
<p>Right, or wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/hannah-pakula-a-biographer-traces-the-rise-of-madame-chiang-kai-shek.htm#comment-177396</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681551#comment-177396</guid>
		<description>In most of the pictures taken of Madam Chiang, she is shown wearing American USAAC/USAAF pilot&#039;s wings.  Does anyone know why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In most of the pictures taken of Madam Chiang, she is shown wearing American USAAC/USAAF pilot&#039;s wings.  Does anyone know why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
