HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Greco-Persian Wars: Battle of Thermopylae

Military History  | Single Page  | 24 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Herodotus' numbers must surely be overstated, although we will never know by how much. We can only accept that Xerxes' army was a vast and apparently awe-inspiring force — according to Herodotus, whenever it stopped to slake its thirst, it drank entire rivers dry.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Military History magazine

Within Xerxes' army, the native Persian contingent was most privileged. Carriages full of women and servants accompanied the Persians on the march. One Persian unit was particularly esteemed: a crack fighting force that Herodotus called the Immortals, alleging that any dead, wounded or sick soldier in its ranks was replaced so swiftly that its 10,000-man strength never seemed to diminish.

Watching his own army pass in review, Xerxes himself is said to have wept as he reflected on the brevity of human life. Not one of them, he observed, would be alive in 100 years' time. It was an unlikely moment of insight for a king who had once ordered one of his own soldiers split in two.

The Persians maintained a splendid marching order. At the front was more than half the army, succeeded by a gap to keep those ordinary troops from being in contact with the king. There followed 1,000 of Persia's finest horsemen, another 1,000 picked spearmen, carrying their spears upside down, 10 sacred horses, a holy chariot drawn by eight horses, then Xerxes' chariot. The king was then followed by 1,000 noble Persian spearmen with their spears pointed upward, another 1,000 picked cavalry, 10,000 infantry, many with gold or silver ornaments on their spears, and finally 10,000 more horsemen before another gap that separated those fine troops from the ordinary soldiers who brought up the rear.

It is entirely possible that Xerxes did not anticipate having to fight any significant battles in Greece. The magnitude of his force was so great that he must have anticipated only demanding surrender in order to receive it. Like his father before him, he sent messengers ahead demanding the traditional tokens of submission — earth and water. Many Greek towns relented in the face of certain destruction. To the Persian king, they conceded, belonged the land and the sea.

Two cities were spared the indignity of the Persian ultimatum. Xerxes well recalled the fate of the messengers his father had sent to Athens and Sparta. The Athenians had thrown them into a pit. In Sparta the Persian diplomats were shown the place to find the earth and water they sought — by being pushed down a well.

Xerxes was familiar with the willful Athenians who had thwarted his father at Marathon 10 years earlier, but along the march he slowly became acquainted with Greece's other most powerful city-state. At one point he asked a Spartan exile if anyone in Greece would dare resist his force. The exile, for whom there was no love lost for the city that had expelled him, admitted that no length of odds could possibly convince the Spartans to submit. The Spartans, he said, feared only the law, and their law forbade them to retreat in battle. It commanded them to stand firm always and to conquer or die.

Knowing that they could not hope to defeat the Persians as individual cities, the Greeks convened a conference in order to coordinate a Panhellenic defense. It was there that the Spartans, whose own city was unique in that it had no walls (relying instead upon the bravery of its citizens for defense), advocated the construction of a wall across the Isthmus of Corinth, thereby protecting only the southernmost part of Greece. The cities north of Corinth, however, knowing that Xerxes could swing around the Aegean and strike Greece from the north, sought an earlier defense. The congress adopted their strategy. The Greeks elected to draw the line at Thermopylae.

To the Greek strategists in 481 bc, Thermopylae represented their best chance to stop or at least delay the Persian army long enough to allow their combined fleets to draw the Persian navy into a decisive sea battle. A narrow mountain pass, Thermopylae was a bottleneck through which the Persian army somehow had to proceed. Forced to fight there, the Persians would be unable to take advantage of their massive preponderance in numbers; instead, they would have to face the Greeks in close-quarter, hand-to-hand combat.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags: ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 24 Comments to “Greco-Persian Wars: Battle of Thermopylae”

  2. After visiting Thermoplae many years ago, I & my Team 4 were invited by the Greek Museum to assist at a site that was discovered that contained the remains of possible Persian allies that were found burried north if the site. 1 lone Spartan helment was found. Our team was asked to split a boulder that concealed the many remains.

    Part of Special Warfare training sets forth the ideals demonstrated at that historical site. The Spartan ideals are drummed into the Id of each trainee at BUDS trainng.

    This article needs to mention that there were several Greek city states that joined the Persians to prevent the destruction of their cities.

    Great article though.

    By Chuck Sorrels, USN/Ret. on Jun 22, 2008 at 11:13 pm

  3. FANTASTIC!!!

    By Mat on Aug 8, 2008 at 2:43 am

  4. how the persian lose?and wen?

    By chester on Sep 15, 2008 at 11:12 pm

  5. this is a very good artical just hit me back up and i would like to no some more about it….

    By denzel on Sep 19, 2008 at 1:55 pm

  6. this rocks and just send me a email

    By denzel on Sep 19, 2008 at 1:58 pm

  7. I really think that this website is a good source for teenagers and other kids who are looking for information of certain topics. I really hope that this helps my grades for my report.

    By Elizabeth on Dec 16, 2008 at 1:42 pm

  8. Well Done. Thanks!

    By Flotch on Jan 4, 2009 at 9:29 pm

  9. good article

    By charelston shew on Jan 27, 2009 at 11:29 pm

  10. Great overview of such a significant battle. You put it best…."the battle’s value lay not in land gained or lost or in men killed or captured, but in inspiration." U.S. Military commanders are still drawing on these principles.

    By Joel on Feb 21, 2009 at 3:03 pm

  11. Herodotus is perhaps not the best source for the number in the Persian army and navy. The army probably numbered around 120 thousand, which is a good size force. This is the first time naval warfare became important. The Persian navy was twice the size of the Greek navy, and the Phonecians sailors who fought for the Persians were beter sailors. The Greek comander at Thermopylae, Leonidas, a Spartian, held off the first Persian attacks, killing thousands. The Greeks were only defeated when the Persians found a pass the attack the Greeks from the back as well as the front. The Greek force totaled 2000, including the famous 300 Spartians, all will killed. I enjoyed your article, especially the listing of the ethnic groups in the Persian army.

    By Bill on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 pm

  12. Thank you very much! I have to write a research paper and this was definitely my Primary Source. I know to come back when I write my next paper.

    By Andrew Simmons on May 7, 2009 at 2:43 pm

  13. Hi There,

    I have found an ancient book written in Persion it seems. It was found in Macedonia and Greece Border.

    Do you know anyone that could possibly tell me what it is? Anyone who studies these things.

    Please email me on: wzeqiri@gmail.com

    William

    By William on May 29, 2009 at 10:44 pm

  14. I applaud the balanced objective conclusion of the writer that befits a work on military history. Refreshingly free of the hubris of "liberty" versus "repression" too often seen in opinions and works about this battle/ conflict. To the Helot or the "unworthy" Sparta was nearly about as totalitarian as it got.

    By WongHoongHooi on Jul 24, 2009 at 2:26 am

  15. Great Article, have to use it for my history report due today, its five o' clock in the morning and school starts at seven, this is a life savior! haha.

    By Miles on Sep 14, 2009 at 8:49 am

  16. super dumb

    By stupid face on Sep 26, 2009 at 1:54 am

  17. One of the most courageous battles I have read about. This was what was meant to be a true spartan. A great read.

    By Jerry Sean Hughes on Oct 9, 2009 at 3:25 pm

  18. I have read so much about the battle at Thermopylae,and have come to the conclusion that it was the greatest heroic deed not just in ancient european history,but in the history of the world thus far.
    Go tell the Spartans,stranger passing by,
    That here obedient to their laws we lie.
    It sends a shiver up your spine,the most courageous story ever told.

    By Crofty756 on Nov 29, 2009 at 10:37 am

  19. You had said the Thesibians surrendered to the Persians before the battle. However you say they also die by the Spartans????????????????????????????

    By 111111111 on Nov 29, 2009 at 6:06 pm

  20. lol sorry about that

    By 111111111 on Dec 6, 2009 at 2:34 pm

  1. 5 Trackback(s)

  2. May 2, 2008: The Greco-Persian Wars | Traveling Through History
  3. Jun 4, 2008: Brigitte Bardot convicted of provoking hatred - Page 2 - Gossip Rocks Forum
  4. Dec 27, 2008: How did the Greek city-states in the Battle of Thermopylae mobilize their troops? - Q&A WIKI
  5. Jul 5, 2009: The Battle of Trichorrhexis Nodosa « Pittsburgh Curly
  6. Oct 22, 2009: Some more good sites « All about Artemisia

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Given cultural differences and expanding populations, could European settlers and America’s native tribes poossibly have co-existed peacefully?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
STAY CONNECTED WITH US 
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
HistoryNet on Twitter HistoryNet RSS Feed

What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Picture of the Day | Daily Quiz | Daily History Question

Copyright © 2010 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Subscription Help