HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

George Washington Pays Homage to Yahweh

By Simon Schama | American History  | Single Page  | 10 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

One section of the Newport community was especially eager to pay their respects to Washington: the Jews of the Kahal Yeshuat Yisrael. Many of them had departed with their fellow citizens at the time of the British occupation, leaving only a few like the parnas (warden) and banker Moses Seixas to protect the deerskin Torah and the fabric of the Touro Synagogue from harm, notwithstanding the latter's appropriation for storage of arms and ammunition, making it a prime target for enemy guns. The Seixases were a little Jewish empire all to themselves. Originally from Lisbon, they had dispersed during the Revolution to Connecticut, New York and Philadelphia where Moses' pious brother Gershon was haham (rabbi), hazzan (cantor), mohel (circumciser) and shochet (ritual slaughterer), a full service minister to the community. Benjamin, another brother, had been an officer in the New York militia. You didn't get any more Judaeo-patriotic than the Seixases. So it was natural for Moses to seize the moment of Washington's visit to clear up one or two matters concerning the First Amendment.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to American History magazine

The letter he penned on August 17 for presentation to the president the following day was a nosegay of praise to the Father of the Nation (and not before time, since the Jews of the several American congregations had been tardy in offering congratulations on Washington's inauguration earlier that year—but then getting a handful of kehillot, community leaders, to sign on the same page of anything counts as a miracle). Between the lines Seixas was also seeking clarification. Had the great day finally arrived when Jews would be treated as all other citizens? Could they now be magistrates, councilors, constables? Above all, could they now vote?

Being "the stock of Abraham," Seixas took an ornamentally Hebraic tone with the general, reflecting on "those days of difficulty and danger when the God of Israel, who delivered David from the peril of the sword shielded Your head in the day of battle…and we rejoice to think that the same Spirit who rested in the Bosom of the greatly beloved Daniel enabling him to preside over the provinces of the Babylonish Empire, rests and will ever rest upon you." That must have softened the old boy up—visions of David at Yorktown; President Daniel. Then the nub of the matter: "Deprived as we heretofore have been of the invaluable rights of free Citizens, we now with a deep sense of gratitude to the Almighty disposer of all events behold a Government erected by the Majesty of the People, a Government which to bigotry gives no sanction, to persecution no assistance—but generously affording to all Liberty of conscience and immunities of Citizenship—deeming every one, of whatever Nation, tongue or language equal parts of the great governmental Machine—This so ample and extensive Federal Union whose basis is Philanthropy, Mutual Confidence and Public Virtue [nice touch that, putting tzedakah, righteous charity, first in the Masonic trio], we cannot but acknowledge to be the work of the Great God who ruleth in the Armies of Heaven." Cleverly Seixas wasn't asking. He was in this manner merely describing what he took to be self-evident, leaving Washington to demur if he must. "For all these Blessings of civil and religious liberty which we enjoy under an equal benign administration, we desire to send up our thanks to the Ancient of Days." (God, not the president.) May he like Joshua when gathered to his Fathers be admitted into "Paradise to partake of the water of life and the tree of immortality."

Washington loved this kind of thing. The next day, after an all-out dinner in the Old State House, he responded to Moses Seixas in a way designed to make Yeshuat Yisrael happy. "The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship." And then came Washington's endorsement of the presumption that active citizenship for all Americans was indeed what was understood in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. America was the republic in which toleration was not bestowed as an "indulgence of one class of people" to another but the "exercise of their inherent national gifts." Then Washington simply lifted the Jew's lovely characterization of a nation "which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance" and rather grandly failed to acknowledge (or perhaps notice) that he had taken it from Moses Seixas' letter. Not until the poet Emma Lazarus came along would a Jew manage to supply so perfectly felicitous phrasing for what the United States was supposed to stand for. Rest assured, the president concluded, in this benign state of affairs, every one of the "Stock of Abraham" "shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there shall be none to make him afraid." A neat touch this, straight from the prayer book of the psalmist. Well, Washington had just been compared to David.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Tags: , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 10 Comments to “George Washington Pays Homage to Yahweh”

  2. IT IS GOOD TO SEE THAT WASHINGTON RECOGNIZED A
    HIGHER POWER. YAHWEH IS THE JEWISH PRONUN-
    CIATION OF JEHOVAH FOUND IN THE KING JAMES
    VERSION BIBLE AT PSALM 83:18 AND THREE OTHER
    PLACES.

    By George Tobias on Apr 8, 2009 at 8:05 pm

  3. If we can only get the religious zealots out of the government and from trying to impose their will on others we would really be doing something to honor Washington and all the other brave patriots who gave their lives for the idea of not only freedom of religion but also freedom from religion.

    By Mike R on May 1, 2009 at 9:01 am

  4. To speak of the founders of America as wanting "not only freedom of religion but also freedom from religion" is so far from the truth that the one promoting the idea should be ashamed to post it on a historical web site. Consider the following quote from James Madison:
    “It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage and such only as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent, both in order of time and in degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. BEFORE ANY MAN CAN BE CONSIDERED AS A MEMBER OF CIVIL SOCIETY, HE MUST BE CONSIDERED AS A SUBJECT OF THE GOVERNOUR OF THE UNIVERSE: And if a member of Civil Society, do it with a saving of his allegiance to the Universal Sovereign…" (emphasis added)

    To me this surely sounds a lot more "religiously zealous" than anything I've ever heard out of Washington DC in my lifetime!

    By Phil Hoff on May 13, 2009 at 2:23 pm

  5. Washington was a member and vestryman for 30 years of the Truro Episcopal church near his home in Virginia.

    By Jim on Jun 5, 2009 at 12:13 pm

  6. AMERICA – Prayer is the only thing that will save us now!

    Jesus is King of Kings and Lord of Lords, not Obama

    By J. C. nowles on Jul 8, 2009 at 9:30 pm

  7. Washington, like many people in colonial America, belonged to the Anglican church and was a vestryman in it. But in early America, particularly in pre-revolutionary America, you had to belong to the dominant church if you wanted to have influence in society, as is illustrated by the following taken from Old Chruches, Ministers and Families of Virginia, by Bishop William Meade, I, p 191. "Even Mr. Jefferson, and George Wythe, who did not conceal their disbelief in Christianity, took their parts in the duties of vestrymen, the one at Williamsburg, the other at Albermarle; for they wished to be men of influence."

    Excerpt from http://www.deism.com/washington.htm

    By D. Baney on Jul 30, 2009 at 9:30 pm

  8. The accepted real name of the creator in the original Hebrew langauge used by the ancient Israelites is Yahweh; not the english translation of Jehovah. King James Version is a weak politically perverted translation of the original Hebrew and Greek Scriptures. Thomas Jefferson recognized Saul know later as Paul, as a heritic. Those books in the New Testament should not be read or followed. See also: http://www.jesusneverexisted.com, http://www.wyattmuseum.com and http://www.templeinstitute.com

    By Private on Sep 20, 2009 at 1:48 pm

  9. It is amazing to me to see at what leights people will go to disbelieve what is commonly known. George Washington and many of the founding fathers all believed in God, a deliever, a Chistian belief. Now most scholars believe that he was Episcopalian example: http://millercenter.org/academic/americanpresident/washington
    Diesm was a new way of thinking during the Enlightenment period of colonial America. It has been said that Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Pain were two that subscribed to that way of thinking. However, I dont think that reading of a Diesm web site will convince anyone that George Washington was a Dies, when their are more facts that prove that he was a believer in a Christian faith.

    By Kevin on Jan 2, 2010 at 7:14 pm

  10. @Mike R

    "to honor Washington and all the other brave patriots who gave their lives for the idea of not only freedom of religion but also freedom from religion."

    Im sorry Mike but if you want to enjoy your hate for anything religous America is not the place. Here we have the freedom to be as religious as we want and no fanactical facsist athiest is going to tell us otherwise.

    By Paul on Jan 23, 2010 at 8:45 pm

  11. down load the web page friends of the third world.

    By james on Feb 10, 2010 at 6:47 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Given cultural differences and expanding populations, could European settlers and America’s native tribes poossibly have co-existed peacefully?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
STAY CONNECTED WITH US 
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
HistoryNet on Twitter HistoryNet RSS Feed

What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Picture of the Day | Daily Quiz | Daily History Question

Copyright © 2010 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Subscription Help