Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Gaming board says no to Gettysburg casino

By Tim and Elizabeth Rowland 
Originally published by America's Civil War magazine. Published Online: July 20, 2011 
Print Friendly
0 comments FONT +  FONT -

No gambling for historic Civil War town

Preservationists claimed victory in Gettysburg this spring when for the second time in five years, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board rejected plans for a casino on the fringes of Gettysburg National Military Park.

The issue had turned into an at-times testy debate over jobs versus heritage, with opponents arguing that the gambling halls would besmirch the honor of the 50,000 soldiers killed or wounded on the field over three July days in 1863. Pro-casino forces contended that the community needed the jobs and tax revenue more than ever to weather the poor economy.

In the end, the board sided with historians, voting 6-1 April 14 to give the state's last re­maining license—which permits up to 600 slot machines and 50 table games—to Nemacolin Woodlands Resort in Farmington. The lone dissenting member favored a resort in the Poconos.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to America's Civil War magazine

"Both personally, and on behalf of our members, I would like to thank the members of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board for their thoughtful deliberation and insightful decision," said Civil War Trust President James Lighthizer. "By stating that the hallowed ground of America's most blood-soaked battlefield is no place for this type of adults-only enterprise, they have reiterated the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's commitment to its priceless history and upheld its obligation to protect such sites from wanton and unnecessary degradation."

Local businessman David LeVan and Florida attorney Joseph Lashinger sought a license for the proposed $75 million Mason Dixon Resort & Casino at the Eisenhower Inn, about a half-mile from South Cavalry Field in the battlefield park. LeVan also sponsored the earlier proposal, for a different location, that was turned down in 2006.
 



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy