<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drones Don&#039;t Die - A History of Military Robotics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/drones-dont-die-a-history-of-military-robotics.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/drones-dont-die-a-history-of-military-robotics.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/drones-dont-die-a-history-of-military-robotics.htm#comment-928377</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683641#comment-928377</guid>
		<description>I think that if they put a cargo load on a global hawk it would still work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if they put a cargo load on a global hawk it would still work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/drones-dont-die-a-history-of-military-robotics.htm#comment-785934</link>
		<dc:creator>S Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683641#comment-785934</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why that wouldn&#039;t be a problem, except for the money factor.  How large of an aircraft can we control remotely?  How about a RPC-130?  could even remotely airdrop cargo.  Perhaps the civilian side of production should attempt this first rather than pushing it on the military to develop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t see why that wouldn&#039;t be a problem, except for the money factor.  How large of an aircraft can we control remotely?  How about a RPC-130?  could even remotely airdrop cargo.  Perhaps the civilian side of production should attempt this first rather than pushing it on the military to develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Nadelman, LMSW</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/drones-dont-die-a-history-of-military-robotics.htm#comment-784273</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Nadelman, LMSW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683641#comment-784273</guid>
		<description>An excellent article.  Now let&#039;s invent robots that can deliver food to the hungry from the air and ground as well as deflect or overcome natural as well as human caused disasters.
Could robots build homes for the homeless as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent article.  Now let&#039;s invent robots that can deliver food to the hungry from the air and ground as well as deflect or overcome natural as well as human caused disasters.<br />
Could robots build homes for the homeless as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
