| |

‘Don’t Give Up the Ship’By Roy and Lesley Adkins | MHQ | 5 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post During the first part of 1807, the British had problems with men deserting from their warships whenever they could seize the opportunity. In one such incident in February 1807, five seamen deserted the frigate Melampus, moored in Hampton Roads, while its officers were entertaining guests. They then enlisted with the American frigate Chesapeake, which was fitting out at the Washington Navy Yard. The men included William Ware, Daniel Martin, and John Strachan. A report described what happened: “While the Officers were engaged and all the Ship’s boat except the captain’s gig hoisted in, they and two other men availed themselves of the opportunity to seize the gig and row off. That as soon as they got into the boat, they were hailed to know what they were going to do: they replied they were going ashore. A brisk fire of musketry instantly commenced from the ship; but in defiance of the danger and at the hazard of their lives, they continued to row and finally effected their escape to Sewell’s point.” In another incident the following month, five more sailors deserted, this time from the sloop HMS Halifax. Under cover of thick fog, they seized control of the sloop’s jolly boat and threatened to murder the midshipman in charge. When they reached shore, the sailors, one of whom was Jenkin Ratford, joined the U.S. Navy under assumed names. Complaining about all the deserters, the British exchanged considerable correspondence with various American authorities. To make matters worse, British officers frequently saw the five deserters in Norfolk, which increased their irritation at being unable to recover them. On one occasion, the captain of Halifax met two deserters, including Ratford, on a Norfolk street and asked them to return. The captain wrote that Ratford retorted “with abuse and oaths, that he was in the land of liberty and would do as he liked.” When nothing was done to return any of the seamen, the matter was taken up with Vice-Admiral Sir George Cranfield Berkeley, commander of the British squadron, who was based at Halifax, Nova Scotia. At the beginning of June 1807, he issued an order to his captains to search Chesapeake for deserters if the American frigate was met “at sea, and without the limits of the United States.” In turn, Berkeley ordered, if the Americans made a similar demand, they should be allowed to search for any deserters, “according to the usages of civilized nations on terms of peace and amity with each other.” Chesapeake was supposed to head for the Mediterranean to relieve the frigate Constitution, which had been away since August 1803—nearly four years. Constitution’s crew should have already returned home and been paid their wages, so its men were disgruntled over the delays in fitting out its sister frigate. In early June, Chesapeake was at long last ready to sail down the Potomac River to Norfolk, where it still needed to be provisioned. This included fitting further guns and loading stores and water, all of which was completed on June 19. Three days later, on the 22nd, Chesapeake sailed into the Atlantic under the command of Commodore James Barron, with Captain Charles Gordon in charge of the ship. It carried a crew of nearly four hundred men and boys, as well as several passengers. They sailed past two of the anchored British warships, Bellona and Melampus. As the United States was not at war, it was of no concern that Chesapeake’s decks were strewn with stores and lumber, that little had been stowed away, and that the crew had never practiced firing the guns. The British frigate Leopard, under Captain Salusbury Pryce Humphreys, had moved farther out to sea, well beyond American waters, and in midafternoon it approached Chesapeake, signaling that it had dispatches. Although a boat from Leopard—a foreign warship—was allowed alongside, Commodore Barron did not call his men to quarters, a common practice if there was no obvious threat. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Tags: 19th Century, Historical Conflicts, Historical Figures, Naval Battles
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
5 Comments to “‘Don’t Give Up the Ship’”
There should be a movie…no, TWO movies (one about each)! What?!
I spied and purchased the MHQ Magazine for its cover story; “Muslim Slayer” because I have always known (but always told differently); that Christians with all ‘their’ Crusades were the initial ‘troublemakers and murderers’ of the religious problems (and even hatred) that now exists (or simmers) between Eastern and Western religions and their respective countries. I knew that was wrong! It has finally been told correctly…that the Muslim ‘religion’ fevered and fueled the Ottoman Empire with selfish grandiose desire for conquest. Religion is man’s answer to God: we should seek God’s answer about Himself and stop trying to out think our One and only Creator. He is not the problem—we BOTH are.
BUT…
I got caught by the, “Don’t give up the ship” story…
Does you neck hurt from that ‘subject’ whiplash? Well, imagine my embarrassment!!!
Now, I grew up in the Newburyport, Ma area—where the Coast Guard was officially born (some seven, odd miles West; in West Newbury) and I remembered that ‘saying’: Now who and what was the situation? I thought. Aaaah, Oh Ya, I remember: “The American Revolution” says my brain…to my brain. I almost past it by…but, “War of 1812!”, caught my mind as my eye glanced off the stern of the ship and off the American flag. “Opps! and you’re a 23 year Military Veteran?” my brain is now arguing with itself.
So I read the entire article without pause and it is one of the few military historical accounts that the writers (excelled in excellence) to ‘paint’ the dramatic story in my mind, as I read. I could smell the cordite and fell down numerous times for all the slippery blood that coated the decks…and Ooh, but our arrogance to suppose we would win with such little effort after being drawn out to fight by that egging letter from Captain Broke! It is a tough story…we lost! Ouch!! But what a movie it would make: That some graves were moved over three times and that the Chesapeake’s wood ended up as a “…watermill in Wickham…” England, and “operated until 1970” and is touted as, “one of the finest surviving buildings constructed from old ship timbers.” It sort of makes me think of a lost but now found solider…whose white cross (in Normandy) can be seen and honored and respected—his body gave all; the Chesapeake timbers gave all.
MAKE A MOVIE!!!
PS: you can publish my e-mail if you like
By Gordon Tatro on Aug 16, 2008 at 3:41 pm
I WISH TO UNSUBSCRIBE TO HISTORY.NET.
I CAN’T SEEM TO FIND AN ICON OR BUTTON TO UNSUBSRIBE. PLEASE DO IT FOR ME OR TELL ME HOW TO DO IT.
THANK YOU. JOHN E. COLLINS
By john e. collins on Aug 21, 2008 at 11:53 am
This battle is mentioned in the book Anne of Green Gables byL.M. Montgomery in her book Anne of the Island pages 33& 34. Nineteen thousand copies of the original book were sold in five months.. Thought you might be interested.
By Nelson Wilsher on Jan 14, 2009 at 4:00 pm