HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Don North: An American Reporter Witnessed the VC Assault on the U.S. Embassy During the Vietnam War

Vietnam  | 3 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Lying flat in the gutter that morning with the MPs, Arnett and I didn’t know where the VC attackers were holed up or where the fire was coming from. But we knew it was the big story.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Vietnam magazine

Arnett and other AP staffers had been the first to alert the world of the attack on the U.S. Embassy. At 3:15 the first bulletin had gone out a full 40 minutes ahead of competitor United Press International (UPI). First Lead Attack: Saigon (AP) The Viet Cong shelled Saigon Wednesday in a bold followup of their attacks on eight major cities around the country.

Simultaneously, a suicide squad of guerrilla commandos infiltrated the capital and at least three are reported to have entered the grounds of the new U.S. Embassy near the heart of the city. U.S. Marine guards at the Embassy, opened only late last year, engaged the infiltrators in an exchange of fire.

Several MPs rushed by, one of them carrying a VC sapper piggyback style. The VC was wounded and bleeding. He wore black pajamas and, strangely, an enormous red ruby ring. I interviewed the MPs and recorded their radio conversation with colleagues inside the embassy gates. The MPs believed the VC were in the chancery building itself, an impression that later proved false. Peter Arnett crawled off to find a phone and report the MPs’ conversation to his office. At 7:25, based on Arnett’s calls from the scene, the AP transmitted the first report that the VC were inside the embassy.Bulletin: Vietnam (Tops 161) Saigon (AP) The Vietcong attacked Saigon Wednesday and seized part of the U.S. Embassy. U.S. Military Police on the scene said it was believed about 20 Vietcong suicide commandos were in the Embassy and held part of the first floor of the Embassy building.

The question of whether the VC were in the chancery building or only in the compound took on symbolic importance. I have replayed the tape of that day in 1968, and there is no doubt the MPs believed the VC were in the chancery.

A helicopter landed on the embassy roof, and troops started working down the floors. MP Dave Lamborn got orders on the field radio from an officer inside the compound: This is Waco, roger. Can you get in the gate now? Take a force in there and clean out the embassy, like now. There will be choppers on the roof and troops working down. Be careful we don’t hit our own people. Over.

As we prepared to join the MPs rushing the gate, I had other concerns. OK, how much film have we got left? I shouted to cameraman Peter Leydon.

I’ve got one mag [400 feet], he replied. How many do you have?

We’re on the biggest story of the war with one can of film, I groaned. So it’s one take of everything, including my standupper. There was no time to argue about whose responsibility it was to have brought more film.

I stepped over the United States seal, which had been blasted off the embassy wall near a side entrance. We rushed through the main gate into the garden, where a bloody battle had been raging. It was, as UPI’s Kate Webb later described, like a butcher shop in Eden.

As helicopters continued to land troops on the roof, we hunkered down on the grass with a group of MPs. They were firing into a small villa on the embassy grounds where they said the VC were making a last stand. Tear gas canisters were blasted through the windows, but the gas drifted back through the garden. Colonel George Jacobson, the U.S. mission coordinator, lived in the villa, and he suddenly appeared at a window on the second floor. An MP threw him a gas mask and a .45 pistol. Three VC were believed to be on the first floor and would likely be driven upstairs by the tear gas. It was high drama, but our ABC News camera rolled film on it sparingly.

I continued to describe everything I saw into a tape recorder, often choking on the tear gas. I could read the embassy ID card in the wallet of Nguyen Van De, whose bloody body was sprawled beside me on the lawn. Nguyen was later identified as an embassy driver who often chauffeured the American ambassador and who had been a driver for 16 years. The MPs told me Nguyen Van De had shot at them during the early fighting and was probably the inside man for the attackers.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Tags: , , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 3 Comments to “Don North: An American Reporter Witnessed the VC Assault on the U.S. Embassy During the Vietnam War”

  2. Recent scholarship does not much agree with much of the information in this article. As one who also watched and fought in Tet 68, I find much of what is written top be inaccurate at best and prevarication at worst.

    By william fisher on Jul 8, 2008 at 8:04 pm

  3. The author often cites public opinion poles. Poles of a public who cannot actually be on the ground at the war making their own evaluations. We have to assume the public’s opinions are formed in large part, by how events are reported to them by people such as himself and his editors. This leaves the public susceptable to how a relatively few people interpert those events. People like the author, who also mentions several times his distrust of military information particularly from Westmoreland. I suspect that renders him unable to report without bias.

    By Rick Nagg on Mar 12, 2009 at 4:20 pm

  4. Is there a way to contact Don North? He mentions an MP that was carrying a wounded Viet Cong. The MP was my friend. Don said he interviewed him at the gate of the US Embassey. My friend was later killed that day, a ways from the US Embassey. I know who he was talking about because there was a picture of him carrying the wounded man in Life Magazine. The audo tape he made would be such a gift to his family after 40 and 3/4 years.

    Thank you
    Nancy Boutwell
    nboutwell@vicr.com 10-02-2009

    By Nancy Boutwell on Oct 2, 2009 at 12:57 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help