HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Dodge City’s Grand Bullfight

Wild West  | 2 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Heavy opposition came from the local clergy, whose members deplored this “stench in the nostrils of civilization,” and urged citizens to boycott the bullfight as proof of “a better state of morals.” Their pleas likewise only served to feed the publicity monster. All this hucksterism had one unanticipated effect, though, which at least briefly seemed to put Webster’s plan in peril. Advance word of the bullfight gained the attention, and aroused the considerable ire, of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Founded in 1866, the New York City-based ASPCA had branches in several other states— Kansas not yet among them. Henry Bergh, the society’s founder and president, aimed a crisp volley of letters and telegrams at Kansas Governor George Washington Glick, beseeching him in typically overwrought Victorian prose to put the kibosh on Dodge’s bit of fun. “Let not American soil,” he begged, “be polluted by such atrocities.” Bergh’s pleas were for nothing; Glick’s sympathies stood with the Dodge crowd. He’s reported as having told a friend that had the bullfight been held a day or two later he’d have surely attended (to which report the Dodge City Times tartly responded: “The Governor is to be congratulated. His tardiness saved a disgrace to the State.”). Glick’s nonchalant attitude led crusader Bergh to take his cause up with higher authorities, a strategy that proved equally ineffectual. When Webster (some sources say mayor Bob Wright) reportedly received a telegram from the U.S. Attorney, informing him that the bullfight was in violation of federal laws, he’s said to have replied, “Hell, Dodge City ain’t in the United States!” Whether Webster, or anyone, received such a message, or this was in fact the answer, it certainly seemed to be Dodge’s stance. When the appointed day came, the fight took place exactly as planned.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Wild West magazine

Early the week of the Fourth, the town had begun filling up with cowboys, tourists, and journalists—both locals and correspondents from areas as far flung as Chicago, New York City and St. Louis. The celebration officially began on Wednesday with a 300-yard horse race and a roping match in the new arena. On Thursday the fun continued with a 500-yard horse race and a shooting competition. Both days’ events drew respectable crowds, but though exciting these “novelties,” as the Dodge City Times referred to them, were not the big draw and everyone involved knew it. For most spectators, the real festivities wouldn’t start until Friday the Fourth.

At midday Friday, horses stood picketed shoulder-to-shoulder up and down Front Street. An estimated 500 to 700 cowboys were in town to see the fun, and the trains off-loaded carloads of the curious from points east and west. Webster led a jubilant procession down the boulevard, followed by Dodge City’s own Cowboy Band. The bullfighters—four matadors and a picador (mounted bullfighter)—strutted behind. All five were gaudily garbed, no doubt in deference to their host country and the occasion, in patriotic red, white and blue. The group was chiefed by “Captain” Gregorio Gallardo, a veterano billed as a fourth-generation matador descended from one of Spain’s finest. Armed with a Toledo sword said to be 150 years old, Gallardo cut such a swashbuckling figure that few would have suspected he made his day-to-day living as a tailor in Chuhuahua. His “fierce lot” of fellow toreros included Evaristo Rivas, Rodrigo Rivas, Marcos Moyor and Juan Herrera. Painted by the local papers as a band of fearless warriors, each resigned to an eventual death in the bull ring, Gallardo’s intrepid crew was composed of two musicians, an artist, and Chihuahua’s supervisor of public works.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags:

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 2 Comments to “Dodge City’s Grand Bullfight”

  2. Doc was my Great Grandfather so it is interesting reading to me.

    By Butch Batman on Jul 4, 2008 at 9:13 am

  3. oxylifdq jgfbnoped ytpeqmc fxgzqhb mpas aruibhcp zfqxctsay

    By kzuxp eaxomfb on Sep 11, 2008 at 6:23 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help