<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking Boston Tea Party Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=debunking-boston-tea-party-myths</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nine myths about Boston &#124; Smithsonian Student Traveler</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-779873</link>
		<dc:creator>Nine myths about Boston &#124; Smithsonian Student Traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-779873</guid>
		<description>[...] Revolt was no party: The Boston Tea Party was no party.  It was a true act of revolution that submitted all involved to trial and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Revolt was no party: The Boston Tea Party was no party.  It was a true act of revolution that submitted all involved to trial and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tea Party Myth</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-774765</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tea Party Myth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-774765</guid>
		<description>[...] in order to fit into the American independence narrative. Instead of a protest against high taxes, the original Tea Party was one against lowered taxes. What really happened was that the British East India Company (EIC), a major business with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in order to fit into the American independence narrative. Instead of a protest against high taxes, the original Tea Party was one against lowered taxes. What really happened was that the British East India Company (EIC), a major business with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palin and History</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-585347</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin and History</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-585347</guid>
		<description>[...] terms of the history, my favorite part is this (from historian Ray Raphael at History.net): The immediate catalyst was a tax break&#8212;not a tax increase&#8212;that effectively made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] terms of the history, my favorite part is this (from historian Ray Raphael at History.net): The immediate catalyst was a tax break&#8212;not a tax increase&#8212;that effectively made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Boston Tea Destruction Led to Unintended Consequences &#171; Notes to Aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-491674</link>
		<dc:creator>The Boston Tea Destruction Led to Unintended Consequences &#171; Notes to Aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-491674</guid>
		<description>[...] more information, see Debunking Boston Tea Party Myths on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more information, see Debunking Boston Tea Party Myths on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The most insipid criticism of Sarah Palin&#8217;s latest incoherent screed &#171; ATLmalcontent</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-426273</link>
		<dc:creator>The most insipid criticism of Sarah Palin&#8217;s latest incoherent screed &#171; ATLmalcontent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-426273</guid>
		<description>[...] was glad to see Chris Matthews sternly correct Brock, reminding him the Boston Tea Party was not an armed conflict. Brock whined in response, &#8220;But that doesn&#8217;t satisfy my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was glad to see Chris Matthews sternly correct Brock, reminding him the Boston Tea Party was not an armed conflict. Brock whined in response, &#034;But that doesn&#039;t satisfy my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Roland Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-397273</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Roland Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-397273</guid>
		<description>If you are refering to the Wheatley s you may be interested in the fact that the two daughters of Nathaniel and Mary[Mary &amp; Elizabeth} reached maturity dying in the 1840&#039;s, A mysterious fact is that they signed their mothers will in 1829 with a cross, indicating they could not write and did not marry; why they could not write is not known as is not known whether they were twins or not. were they blind or had a physical deformity? their cousin Amelia Enderby was a Dwarf in Physical stature but not mentally.The Enderby&#039;s left money to at least two schools in the Blackheath area. 
Mary &amp; Nathaniel, twins, died within months of each other from what causes is not known</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are refering to the Wheatley s you may be interested in the fact that the two daughters of Nathaniel and Mary[Mary &amp; Elizabeth} reached maturity dying in the 1840&#039;s, A mysterious fact is that they signed their mothers will in 1829 with a cross, indicating they could not write and did not marry; why they could not write is not known as is not known whether they were twins or not. were they blind or had a physical deformity? their cousin Amelia Enderby was a Dwarf in Physical stature but not mentally.The Enderby&#039;s left money to at least two schools in the Blackheath area.<br />
Mary &amp; Nathaniel, twins, died within months of each other from what causes is not known</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Roland Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-397259</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Roland Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-397259</guid>
		<description>For what your comment means you may as well shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what your comment means you may as well shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ???</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-395317</link>
		<dc:creator>???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-395317</guid>
		<description>^^^^^^ LOSER!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^^^^ LOSER!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: your mom</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-395315</link>
		<dc:creator>your mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-395315</guid>
		<description>im doing a project on this and this is helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im doing a project on this and this is helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Roland Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/debunking-boston-tea-party-myths.htm#comment-373802</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Roland Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682171#comment-373802</guid>
		<description>The Tea Party was two fold one Independence or representation, the other was to get Whaling ships past Cape Horn and Cape of Good Hope
James Cooks Endeavour, The Boston Tea Party and the First Fleet to Australia in 1788 are all tied together. I am afraid Americans know very little about the Tea Party as they do not appear to know anything about Nathaniel Wheatley and his &#039;sister&#039; Phillis. He is libelled by calling him a Loyalist when he was a Patriot. see second story in my book- Caroline Princess of Wales and other forgotten people of History.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tea Party was two fold one Independence or representation, the other was to get Whaling ships past Cape Horn and Cape of Good Hope<br />
James Cooks Endeavour, The Boston Tea Party and the First Fleet to Australia in 1788 are all tied together. I am afraid Americans know very little about the Tea Party as they do not appear to know anything about Nathaniel Wheatley and his &#039;sister&#039; Phillis. He is libelled by calling him a Loyalist when he was a Patriot. see second story in my book- Caroline Princess of Wales and other forgotten people of History.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

