Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Book Review: Wrong Turn, by Colonel Gian Gentile

By HistoryNet Staff 
Originally published by Military History magazine. Published Online: October 30, 2013 
Print Friendly
0 comments FONT +  FONT -

Wrong Turn: America's Deadly Embrace of Counterinsurgency, by Colonel Gian Gentile, The New Press, New York, 2013, $24.95

The Iraq War was going badly in 2007 when President George W. Bush sent a surge of additional troops into theater and appointed General David Petraeus commander of Multi-National Force–Iraq. A major figure in establishing the U.S. Army's new counterinsurgency doctrine, Petraeus applied it, turned matters around and placed America on the path to victory. That's the official version, not what actually occurred, according to Colonel Gian Gentile, Iraq War veteran and professor of military history at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Military History magazine

Counterinsurgency theory teaches that during civil disorder a tiny minority in any population supports the government, a similar minority the insurgents, and the majority remains neutral but can be won over by protecting them, solving their problems and winning their trust.

Gentile argues that counterinsurgency warfare is not new, and even if applied effectively, it's an expensive, long-term tactic that produces more, not fewer, civilian casualties. It does have limited uses, but as a dominant strategy it leads to interminable wars—which Americans never tolerate. Counterinsurgency operations were not responsible for the diminished violence in Iraq, and few deny its receiving ineffective lip-service in Afghanistan.

Gentile makes his case in four astutely argued chapters. In everyone's favorite insurgency, Malaya (1948–60), the British did not try to win peoples' hearts and minds. They locked them into fortified camps, successfully isolating the guerrillas.

Despite the narrative that the United States rushed into Vietnam, guns blazing, hoping to defeat the Viet Cong with superior firepower, Gentile maintains that pacification was a goal from the start and persisted throughout the American presence. It failed because the South Vietnamese government never won its people's trust.

Violence diminished in Iraq in 2007, says Gentile, largely because al-Qaida (not a native Iraqi movement) exasperated Sunni insurgents, who turned against it, and because Shia government and military factions decided to stop fighting each other. Now the Shia and Sunni go at it absent the United States and with al-Qaida marginalized. No one claims we have built a nation in
Iraq, which remains faction- and violence-ridden, and the subsequent much-hyped transfer of surge, counterinsurgency and Petraeus to Afghanistan has faded from the news.

Gentile insists there is less to counterinsurgency than meets the eye, except for generals and politicians anxious to explain why our recent wars have gone so badly. This remains a minority view, but (three wars and counting) it's debatable whether reinvented armies practicing counterinsurgency under imaginative generals can rescue wars that arguably should never have been fought in the first place.

—Mike Oppenheim


Recommended


Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy