Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Book Review: Scapegoats (Edward L. Beach): WWII

Originally published on HistoryNet.com. Published Online: August 12, 2001 
Print Friendly
2 comments FONT +  FONT -


SCAPEGOATS
The surprise attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, has been a source of debate ever since and will probably continue to be, because it is difficult to fix terms of reference. For example, was the probable withholding of information from the commanders on the scene that of commission (criminal conspiracy) or omission (ineptitude)? Would timely information have made any difference anyway? It did not in the Philippines, eight hours later. And what does America in 1996, more than half a century after the end of the war that began for us there, do about Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet, and Lt. Gen. Walter C. Short, commander of the Hawaiian Department of the U.S. Army? Both officers retired under dark clouds that have never been officially lifted.

Now the distinguished naval writer Edward L. Beach, a retired U.S. Navy captain well known as the author of such works as Run Silent, Run Deep and The United States Navy: 200 Years, weighs in with Scapegoats (Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, Md., 1995, $24.95). Beach makes it clear that his is not a revisionist work, but a reinterpretation of the many available studies of one of the United States' most famous disasters. His is a distinctively American effort to clear the individual commanders' honor, which, he argues, was unfairly stained.

Certainly, as Beach reviews the evidence, Kimmel and Short were in an impossible situation. A Purple machine, which enabled American cryptanalysts to read Japanese message traffic, had been earmarked for Pearl Harbor but was diverted to England. Anti-aircraft assets were one sixth of those required. All of 100 promised Consolidated PBY-5 Catalina patrol aircraft went to England. Kimmel's predecessor, Admiral James O. Richardson, had been abruptly removed from his position for protesting the materiel and intelligence shortcomings at Pearl.

In context, Beach explains that the U.S. Pacific defensive perimeter had shifted to west of the Philippines. Pearl Harbor was, in the view of Washington, a relative backwater. Who could have anticipated Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto's unorthodox plan to strike the U.S. Pacific Fleet at its home port?

The picture that emerges under Beach's marshaling is a familiar one: a Washington political and military establishment riveted on the war in Europe and talking only to itself. The top secret decoding capability of the Purple machine was not fully utilized due to understaffing, and only the diplomatic code traffic–not the naval operational code traffic–was attended to. There may have been some concern that utilization of some of the intelligence gained in Operation Magic might compromise the capability by warning the Japanese that their mail was being read. Beach, however, concludes that it was possible to protect Magic and still warn Kimmel. Nonetheless, critical references to Pearl Harbor, such as the "bomb plot" message of September 24, 1941, seeking berthing information on the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Pearl, were withheld from Kimmel by Admiral Richmond Kelly Turner. Holding sway over naval war plans, Turner even reassigned two officers who protested the failure to send that news to Kimmel. Beach believes that if Turner alone had not stood in the way, adequate warnings would likely have reached Kimmel, as had been promised by Admiral Harold Stark, chief of Naval Operations. Kimmel possessed contingency plans for putting the fleet to sea given a significant warning. As it was, Beach judges that Stark could have been sued for damages for the failure of his Navy to warn Kimmel and Short.

There are many other conundrums, the most telling of which may be the December 6, 1941, midnight White House "meeting-that-never-was." General George C. Marshall, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke in Washington, D.C., that evening, and was accustomed to stopping by the White House when he was downtown. Later he could not recall what he had been doing that night. It is well known that Marshall was also unreachable during the critical early hours of December 7 because he was horseback riding. Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox later muddied the waters with reference to a midnight warning that he assumed Marshall had sent to Pearl Harbor. The text of that warning has never been found. The rest, as they say, is history: the attack on Pearl, the subsequent attack on the Philippines for which the American defenders were unprepared, President Franklin D. Roosevelt's denunciation of Japan, Hitler's declaration of war, and four years of conflict. Even before the war was over, a series of inquiries began in which Kimmel and Short were never formally charged, never accorded counsel, yet which resulted in dereliction of duty statements that Roosevelt accepted. Where does this leave us now? Beach calls himself a "second-class revisionist," not prepared to declare Roosevelt guilty of conspiracy, but seeing his willingness to let history unfold hopefully in a way that would allow the United States to enter the war against Germany. The Pearl Harbor attack was a convenient military disaster on the way to our "crusade in Europe." Kimmel and Short were expendable casualties in a greater cause. It was not the first nor last time that subordinate commanders have been placed out on a limb and have seen that limb subsequently sawed off.

Beach's quest is now to get history rewritten to clear the undeserved dishonor of Kimmel and Short.

Will it happen? In 1995, Kimmel's grandson, Manning M. Kimmel, IV, pleaded his grandfather's case in Senate hearings. The Navy's general counsel declared in response that there is no historical evidence that President Roosevelt or anyone else in Washington deliberately withheld information that Kimmel needed to properly defend Pearl Harbor.
Roderick S. Speer



2 Responses to “Book Review: Scapegoats (Edward L. Beach): WWII”


  1. 1
    TOM KIMMEL says:

    Roderick,
    Too bad Beach, let alone Kimmel, did not know about this:

    On December 7, 1941 the President of the United States was asked: “How did the Japanese catch us with our pants down?” The Congress of the United States later asked: “one enigmatical and paramount question . . . . [w]hy was it possible for a Pearl Harbor to occur?” On December 11, 1941, the Director of the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover, thought he had the answer and sent it to the President immediately: Army and Navy Intelligence in Washington, DC had learned the entire Japanese attack plan days before the attack, and sent it to Admiral Kimmel, the Commander-in-Chief of the Pacific Fleet in Hawaii, who did nothing about it.

    Supreme Court Associate Justice Owen Roberts, Chairman of the Roberts Commission, the tribunal immediately appointed to investigate the Pearl Harbor disaster, tried but could not prove that Kimmel had this information and failed to act on it. But then Roberts put blinders on and failed to follow Mr. Hoover’s logically suggested written investigative leads in Washington, D.C., as to whether this information was available in Washington and simply not sent to Hawaii. And then later, Roberts inexplicably lied to Congress about where he got the original allegation against Kimmel.
    FOR DETAILS SEE MY WEBSITE AT:
    HTTP://PEARLHARBOR911ATTACKS.COM.
    Regards,
    Tom Kimmel

  2. 2
    TOM KIMMEL says:

    Roderick,
    Here are some more relevant and material facts unknown Beach and Kimmel. Again, too bad:
    Following the Pearl Harbor disaster, FDR’s investigating commission, the Roberts Commission, pointed just two fingers of blame: one at Admiral Husband E. Kimmel and the other at Lt. General Walter C. Short, the Navy and Army commanders in Hawaii. However, mounting new evidence clearly demonstrates not only that the Pearl Harbor commanders shouldered the blame unjustly but that the FBI secretly and shamelessly contributed to this result. Specifically, the FBI successfully: (1) shielded investigation of its own failures from all Pearl Harbor investigations; (2) acquiesced to the Commission Chairman’s perjury to Congress; (3) secretly influenced Congress’ report to protect the FBI at the expense of the Army and Navy; (4) secretly made false accusations against Admiral Kimmel and General Short; and (5) conspired to withhold evidence from the Attorney General.
    FOR DETAILS SEE the National Military Intelligence Association's American Intelligence Journal, Volume 27, No. 1, Fall 2009, pages 41-48, or email me for a copy from my website at:
    HTTP://PEARLHARBOR911ATTACKS.COM.
    Regards,
    Tom Kimmel



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy