| |

Battle of VicksburgAmerica's Civil War | 34 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post
Volunteer regiments from Indiana and Illinois joined them, but they could not enter the works because of intense Confederate fire. Other Union troops did not get as far. As one Southern officer wrote: ‘They marched up in one solid column … when [our men] opened a terrific volley of musketry. The enemy wavered a moment, and then marched forward. They were again met by another volley, when they broke and fled under cover of the hills.’ Subscribe Today
Many more Federal troops were pinned down between the lines, lying amid the canebrakes that covered the terrain. It was all they could do to remain low and avoid the killing rain of Minie bullets and artillery fire. Not long after, when night had obscured the battlefield, Sherman ordered all his advanced troops withdrawn.
This first attack was repulsed with some 950 Federal casualties, to a Confederate loss of about 250 men. True to form, Grant’s thoughts turned immediately to another attempt, this time making full use of all his command.
Historians have debated for years the wisdom of Grant’s ordering another assault. In his official report on the campaign, Grant himself gave four reasons for trying again. First, he hoped the advanced positions gained on the nineteenth would make success more certain. Also, he knew that Rebel General Joseph Johnston, to his rear, was increasing the size of his own army, which, if joined together with Pemberton’s, would outnumber Grant’s force of 45,000.
Third, a successful assault would free Grant’s men for action against Johnston and avoid the miasmal toll of a siege during a steamy Mississippi summer. Grant’s last and most important reason was his innate perception of his troops’ temperament. Even if another assault failed, he believed the men would not work as willingly on the trenches and other necessities of a siege unless they had first tried to take Vicksburg by the front door.
Here Grant was counting on the army’s confidence and swagger, built up by three weeks of brilliant success. For the most part, only Sherman’s troops had been bloodied on the nineteenth; the army still considered the Rebs demoralized and ripe for one more defeat, strong defenses or no. One observer noted, ‘They felt as if they could march straight through Vicksburg, and up to their waists in the Mississippi, without resistance.’ Observant Sergeant Oldroyd of Ohio had a clear view of the besieged city: ‘We can see the court house…with a Confederate flag floating over it. What fun it will be to take that down and hoist in its stead the old stars and stripes’
Grant planned a coordinated 10 a.m. assault. The night before, he issued full rations to his men, many of whom had spent the previous two days strengthening their positions or building roads. Perhaps he knew what lay ahead; certainly the troops did, as night stretched into morning. ‘The boys…were busy divesting themselves of watches, rings, pictures and other keepsakes’ one observer noted. ‘The instructions left with the keepsakes were varied: ‘This watch I want you to send to my father if I never return.’ ‘If I do not get back, just send these trifles home, will you?”
The attacking infantrymen were to move against the Confederate entrenchments as a solid unit–Sherman’s to the north, McPherson’s in the center on both sides of the road linking Vicksburg and Jackson, and McClernand’s to the south, centered on the Southern Mississippi Railroad track leading east out of Vicksburg.
They prepared to assault perhaps the best-defended Southern city outside Richmond. The rifle pits and trenches surrounding Vicksburg on three sides linked nine steep-walled forts, protected by ditches. Since these forts commanded high ground, they were of great advantage to the deadly marksmen wearing gray. Rebel artillerymen, in turn, had doubleloaded their cannons with grape and canister. A final obstacle faced the attackers: felled timber further choking the already rugged terrain. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6Tags: 19th Century, America's Civil War, American Civil War, Historical Conflicts
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
34 Comments to “Battle of Vicksburg”
GRANT SAID IOWA IS A YOUNG STATE BUT IT IS A HOME OF HEROS THE IOWANS SAVED MY ARMY
By RIC BATCHELLER on Jul 17, 2008 at 3:34 pm
A BATTLE FLAG CARRIED BY AN IOWAN NAMED BLISARD IS AT THE ANAMOSA LIBRARY BLISARD WAS KILLED IN THE ATTACK OF MAY 22 1863
By RIC BATCHELLER on Jul 17, 2008 at 3:39 pm
wow learn
By mike owens on Sep 11, 2008 at 10:49 am
this info isnt helping
By mike owens on Sep 11, 2008 at 10:50 am
Who was the Union general?
By Emily on Sep 24, 2008 at 9:28 am
THIS INFO DID NOT HELP AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANKS A LOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-James
By James on Dec 4, 2008 at 4:54 pm
THIS WEBSITE IS AMAZING IT’S THE BOMB.COM FOR REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT IS FULL OF THE MOST INTERESTING INFO EVER!!!!!! I AM TRULY IN LOVE WITH THIS SITE FOR REALS!!!!!!!!! THIS TRUELY GAVE ME A LOVE FOR THE BATTLE OF VICKSBURG!!!!!! THANK YOU AND GOODNIGHT
By Stacy Smith on Dec 11, 2008 at 2:18 pm
thanks for helping with my history project =)
By Julie ann on Dec 31, 2008 at 1:58 pm
this sucks!!
By russyboy on Feb 25, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Who was lincoln? hes kind of cute
By russyboy on Feb 25, 2009 at 4:34 pm
This site is great!!!!
By russyboy on Mar 3, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Wow this was really helpful for a report I had to do! Thank you for having this site!
By Faceless Recon on Mar 19, 2009 at 5:28 pm
That was confusing. It was too long.
:)
By Leah on Mar 19, 2009 at 8:02 pm
That stuff isn’t even right so that sucks
By Leah on Mar 19, 2009 at 8:03 pm
Who were the southern generals of the battle,
an the northern gerneral
By michelle on Mar 25, 2009 at 1:29 am
This is a great site! A new insight from a SOUTHERN California girl who is writing a novel about two fourteen-year old girls from Vicksburg after starvation, the seige and surrender. A white girl and her black slave companion who grew up together. Their escape and journey to freedom in Natchez. “The Natchez Children.” If you have info that might be conducive for my first juvinile novel, e-mail me at djbucklew@yahoo.com. I read (somewhere!) about a young girl who waved a white flag at the Union Soldiers. Please help me with research for one of several of my short stories about brave (young and old) women–A collection I’m calling “A Hint of the Wild.” (FYI: I am not your California Valley Girl; I lived in Natchez on an old plantation for five years.)
By darleine j bucklew on Mar 31, 2009 at 6:28 pm
no help at thaks alot now im just that much stupider
By sean so sexy on Apr 7, 2009 at 10:35 am
you should put more pictures :]
By Laney Morgan on Apr 8, 2009 at 8:12 pm
this is tooo confusing for teenagers of my standard
By morgan on Apr 29, 2009 at 11:08 am
you should try an make this more understandable please cuz i mite be bak oon thes website an i wanna be able to understand this okay thanx
By morgan on Apr 29, 2009 at 11:10 am
thnx this helped me bring up my social studies grade
By justin on May 2, 2009 at 10:06 pm
THIS DIDN’T HELP!
By lauren on May 3, 2009 at 3:34 pm
this site was really helpful thank you
By meghan on May 4, 2009 at 9:06 am
i love this website
By emily on May 11, 2009 at 1:29 pm
this sucks really badly never seen anything worse then this
By jose qortez on May 12, 2009 at 11:58 am
this is worthless it is not even HELPFULL AT ALL!!
By leha on May 12, 2009 at 1:06 pm
you did not tell us how many dead
By anonymous on Jul 7, 2009 at 5:48 pm
The info had many details that I needed. However, when I went to print, only page one printed. Along with page one, I got 3 pages of readers’ comments. Not good.
By Linda on Jul 23, 2009 at 11:05 am
Try this to print the article without Comments atached:
Click Print this Post from the menu directly below the title.
Where the comments begin, click Close
Near the bottom of the page click Click here to print.
Hopefully, that will give you what you need.
By GeraldS on Jul 23, 2009 at 5:02 pm
this info is color coated it helps you a ton unless you don’t do good with colors
By person on Sep 1, 2009 at 12:16 pm
i think they should rid of all the colors
By anynomous on Sep 1, 2009 at 12:19 pm
borrrrinngggg
By melissa on Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 am
this was sooooo good! it helped me so much! so thank you soooo much! it was sooo awesome! like wow, amazing. i’m so thankful for this website! i’m estactic! :):):):):):):):):):):):)
By kbus on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:36 pm
the colors definitely need to go though.
By kbus on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:37 pm