HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Battle of Vicksburg

America's Civil War  | Single Page  | 36 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Alarmed residents of Vicksburg, Mississippi, watched in despair on the night of May 17, 1863, as thousands of ragged, downcast Southern soldiers poured into their city from all directions. 'Where are you going?' a townsperson demanded of a fleeing Confederate. 'We are running' the soldier forthrightly replied.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to America's Civil War magazine

The man the Rebels were running from, Union Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, had ended months of Northern frustration and failure by landing an overwhelming force in western Mississippi on the night of April 30, then moving inland across the state. In 17 days of brilliant campaigning, the misleadingly phlegmatic Grant had inflicted five crushing defeats on separate bands of Confederate warriors who had always felt that enemy soldiers could never threaten them so deep on their own home soil.

All this Grant had accomplished while cut off from his base of operations and supply, and in direct violation of his stated orders to advance south into Louisiana for a combined operation against Port Hudson. By May 16, when he met and decisively defeated Lt. Gen. John Pemberton's troops at Champion's Hill, 25 miles east of Vicksburg, Grant stood poised for a final assault on the crucial Mississippi River town.

Vicksburg had been the object of intense Union attention since the start of the war. Abraham Lincoln knew its importance. 'We can take all the northern ports of the Confederacy, and they can still defy us from Vicksburg' he said. 'It means hogs and hominy without limit, fresh troops from all the states of the far South, and a cotton country where they can raise the staple without interference.' Confederate President Jefferson Davis called it 'the nailhead that held the South's two halves together.' Though Fort Pillow to the north and New Orleans to the south were in Union hands by May 1863, Vicksburg closed the lower Mississippi to unhindered Federal traffic-and was a looming symbol of Confederate defiance.

Following his victories at Champion's Hill and, one day later, at Big Black River Bridge, Grant was confident of quick victory. 'I believed,' he later wrote, '[the enemy] would not make much effort to hold Vicksburg.' Sergeant Osborn Oldroyd of the 20th Ohio shared the feeling. He wrote in his diary, 'We have now come here to compel them to surrender, and we are prepared to do it either by charge or by siege … they cannot say us nay.'

A Union charge was not long in coming. Grant, confident that one sharp push could overwhelm the demoralized Confederates in their defenses and avoid a long, uncomfortable siege, ordered an assault all along his front to begin at mid-afternoon on May 19. Major General William T. Sherman's XV Corps was to attack points along the northern end of the' Confederate line. Meanwhile, Maj. Gens. James McPherson's and John McClernand's troops were to assault the Confederate center and right, respectively.

But between the defeats at Champion's Hill and Big Black River Bridge and the afternoon of May 19, something had happened to the Confederate Army of Vicksburg. Pemberton had left 10,000 men in the city when he ventured out, and these unbloodied troops stiffened the resolve of those returning from battle. They were also behind strong fortifications. And, as Grant soon would find out, he could not even rely on the normal competence of his corps commanders in the upcoming fight.

The May 19 action was hampered from the start. Though Grant ordered an assault all along the line, McClernand's and McPherson's troops were delayed by the tangled underbrush and treacherous ravines common to the area, and were pinned down by sharp Confederate rifle fire. The bulk of the assault fell, thus, to Sherman's command.

Sherman's advance was tentative, not the first time this was to happen at Vicksburg. Only one brigade, commanded by Colonel Giles Smith, managed to gain much headway. It advanced to the outer trenches of the 'Stockade Redan,' at a critical bend in the defensive lines. Troopers from the 1st Battalion, 13th U.S. Infantry, Sherman's own pre-war unit, carried its flag to the very edge of the Rebel works.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags: , , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 36 Comments to “Battle of Vicksburg”

  2. GRANT SAID IOWA IS A YOUNG STATE BUT IT IS A HOME OF HEROS THE IOWANS SAVED MY ARMY

    By RIC BATCHELLER on Jul 17, 2008 at 3:34 pm

  3. A BATTLE FLAG CARRIED BY AN IOWAN NAMED BLISARD IS AT THE ANAMOSA LIBRARY BLISARD WAS KILLED IN THE ATTACK OF MAY 22 1863

    By RIC BATCHELLER on Jul 17, 2008 at 3:39 pm

  4. wow learn

    By mike owens on Sep 11, 2008 at 10:49 am

  5. this info isnt helping

    By mike owens on Sep 11, 2008 at 10:50 am

  6. Who was the Union general?

    By Emily on Sep 24, 2008 at 9:28 am

  7. THIS INFO DID NOT HELP AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    THANKS A LOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    -James

    By James on Dec 4, 2008 at 4:54 pm

  8. THIS WEBSITE IS AMAZING IT'S THE BOMB.COM FOR REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT IS FULL OF THE MOST INTERESTING INFO EVER!!!!!! I AM TRULY IN LOVE WITH THIS SITE FOR REALS!!!!!!!!! THIS TRUELY GAVE ME A LOVE FOR THE BATTLE OF VICKSBURG!!!!!! THANK YOU AND GOODNIGHT

    By Stacy Smith on Dec 11, 2008 at 2:18 pm

  9. thanks for helping with my history project =)

    By Julie ann on Dec 31, 2008 at 1:58 pm

  10. this sucks!!

    By russyboy on Feb 25, 2009 at 4:33 pm

  11. Who was lincoln? hes kind of cute

    By russyboy on Feb 25, 2009 at 4:34 pm

  12. This site is great!!!!

    By russyboy on Mar 3, 2009 at 4:14 pm

  13. Wow this was really helpful for a report I had to do! Thank you for having this site!

    By Faceless Recon on Mar 19, 2009 at 5:28 pm

  14. That was confusing. It was too long.
    :)

    By Leah on Mar 19, 2009 at 8:02 pm

  15. That stuff isn't even right so that sucks

    By Leah on Mar 19, 2009 at 8:03 pm

  16. Who were the southern generals of the battle,
    an the northern gerneral

    By michelle on Mar 25, 2009 at 1:29 am

  17. This is a great site! A new insight from a SOUTHERN California girl who is writing a novel about two fourteen-year old girls from Vicksburg after starvation, the seige and surrender. A white girl and her black slave companion who grew up together. Their escape and journey to freedom in Natchez. "The Natchez Children." If you have info that might be conducive for my first juvinile novel, e-mail me at djbucklew@yahoo.com. I read (somewhere!) about a young girl who waved a white flag at the Union Soldiers. Please help me with research for one of several of my short stories about brave (young and old) women–A collection I'm calling "A Hint of the Wild." (FYI: I am not your California Valley Girl; I lived in Natchez on an old plantation for five years.)

    By darleine j bucklew on Mar 31, 2009 at 6:28 pm

  18. no help at thaks alot now im just that much stupider

    By sean so sexy on Apr 7, 2009 at 10:35 am

  19. you should put more pictures :]

    By Laney Morgan on Apr 8, 2009 at 8:12 pm

  20. this is tooo confusing for teenagers of my standard

    By morgan on Apr 29, 2009 at 11:08 am

  21. you should try an make this more understandable please cuz i mite be bak oon thes website an i wanna be able to understand this okay thanx

    By morgan on Apr 29, 2009 at 11:10 am

  22. thnx this helped me bring up my social studies grade

    By justin on May 2, 2009 at 10:06 pm

  23. THIS DIDN'T HELP!

    By lauren on May 3, 2009 at 3:34 pm

  24. this site was really helpful thank you

    By meghan on May 4, 2009 at 9:06 am

  25. i love this website

    By emily on May 11, 2009 at 1:29 pm

  26. this sucks really badly never seen anything worse then this

    By jose qortez on May 12, 2009 at 11:58 am

  27. this is worthless it is not even HELPFULL AT ALL!!

    By leha on May 12, 2009 at 1:06 pm

  28. you did not tell us how many dead

    By anonymous on Jul 7, 2009 at 5:48 pm

  29. The info had many details that I needed. However, when I went to print, only page one printed. Along with page one, I got 3 pages of readers' comments. Not good.

    By Linda on Jul 23, 2009 at 11:05 am

  30. Try this to print the article without Comments atached:

    Click Print this Post from the menu directly below the title.

    Where the comments begin, click Close

    Near the bottom of the page click Click here to print.

    Hopefully, that will give you what you need.

    By GeraldS on Jul 23, 2009 at 5:02 pm

  31. this info is color coated it helps you a ton unless you don't do good with colors

    By person on Sep 1, 2009 at 12:16 pm

  32. i think they should rid of all the colors

    By anynomous on Sep 1, 2009 at 12:19 pm

  33. borrrrinngggg

    By melissa on Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 am

  34. this was sooooo good! it helped me so much! so thank you soooo much! it was sooo awesome! like wow, amazing. i'm so thankful for this website! i'm estactic! :):):):):):):):):):):):)

    By kbus on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:36 pm

  35. the colors definitely need to go though.

    By kbus on Nov 16, 2009 at 12:37 pm

  36. Boring tell us more info PLEASE!! on a scale of 1 to10 this gets a -200

    By AngryMob on Jan 23, 2010 at 9:33 pm

  37. I HATE THIS WEBSITE AND THAT IS A FACT }:( <Grr

    By AngryMob on Jan 23, 2010 at 9:38 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

If the Tirpitz and the Bismarck could have operated together, would it have made much difference in the naval war of the Atlantic?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help