HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Battle of the Bismarck Sea

By Lawrence Spinetta | World War II  | 7 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Aircrew who witnessed this incident were incensed. Capt. James Murphy recalled, “ I wanted to vent some of my anger and kill every Japanese son of a bitch I could find.” Three P-38 pilots dove their aircraft to engage the Japanese planes that were shooting the B-17 aircrew in their parachutes. All three P-38s were shot down, but not before taking five Japanese fighters with them.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to World War II magazine

Certainly, some aircrew were motivated by revenge, but most felt that military necessity justified their actions. In fact, Allied aircrews had commenced strafing survivors immediately after the initial attacks—before the loss of Lieutenant Moore’s plane. And aircrews who hadn’t witnessed Japanese fighters fire on the Americans in their parachutes also participated in the strafing of Japanese survivors. A tactical report by 2d Lt. Charles Howe detailing his March 3 attack in B-25-C1 No. 980 is typical: “Considerable time was spent after the release of all my bombs on strafing survivors and supplies which were strewn as far as the eye could see. On one strafing run against a previously damaged destroyer, I caught the survivors in the act of launching lifeboats. After firing for about seven seconds, I ceased firing to find the lifeboats overturned and the crowd of men attempting to gain the lifeboats definitely out of action.”

At the time, strafing Japanese survivors was not controversial. The public’s view was consistent with a comment made by one officer who flew on these missions: “The enemy is out to kill you and you are out to kill the enemy. You can’t be sporting in war.” The public rejoiced after hearing media reports that Japan suffered fifteen thousand casualties at the Battle of the Bismarck Sea. The New York Times and other newspapers ran the story on their front pages, and Life magazine featured General Kenney on its cover.

Enemy documents and diaries subsequently recovered from the convoy’s wreckage revealed that those initial estimates of Japanese losses were exaggerated. One report, compiled from Japanese sources, placed the losses at 2,890. Another, compiled by the Allied Translator & Interpreter Section, suggested the Japanese lost 6,912. Despite this, Kenney and MacArthur steadfastly refused to revise their claims. Kenney threatened “action against those responsible” for questioning his assessment of the battle. A Fifth Air Force intelligence officer accused Kenney of ordering that reports and evidence suggesting lower Japanese losses be burned. MacArthur said at the time that he thought “the navy was trying to belittle the whole thing because they weren’t in on it.…It’s against the rules for land-based airplanes to sink ships, especially naval vessels. It’s bad enough for them to sink merchant vessels. They ought to be sunk by battleship gunfire or by submarines. But for airplanes to do it, especially if they aren’t naval airplanes, it’s all wrong.”

Regardless of the exact number of soldiers who perished and ships that were sunk, the Battle of the Bismarck Sea was a complete and decisive victory for Allied air power. Only 820 Japanese soldiers, minus their equipment, supplies, and weapons, made it to Lae. Kenney’s congratulatory message to his staff summed up the effort well: “Air Power has written some important history in the past three days,” he wrote. “Tell the whole gang that I am so proud of them I am about to blow a fuze.”


This article was written by Lawrence Spinetta and originally published in the November 2007 issue of World War II Magazine. For more great articles, subscribe to World War II magazine today!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags: , , , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 7 Comments to “Battle of the Bismarck Sea”

  2. does anyone happen to know if there is a picture of the 6816 ton Japanese merchantman Kembu Maru. Does one exist?

    By mwolf on Aug 1, 2008 at 1:13 pm

  3. As much as this analysis of the Battle of The Bismarck Sea is appreciated, it too often reaches the level of revisionist history as it relates to the actual architect and the structure of this stunning Allied victory.

    As the well researched and documented book “Pappy Gunn”, penned by his son Nathaniel (http://www.historynet.com/pappy-gunn-book-review.htm#comment-4601) notes, this battle was well on its way to being a repeat of the previous attempt by Gen. Kenney to stop a similar base re-supply convoy earlier in the year. The attacks by the B-17s and B-25s bombing from high and medium altitudes were thwarted by weather and inaccuracy, and finally, frustrated with with the lack of results, Ed Larner’s strafing and skip bombing B-25s along with A-20s, were ordered into action AND NOT BY GEN. KENNEY. The book reveals details of precisely what happened at a critical and pivotal moment in this operation.

    Kenney and Gunn, however, were an impressive duo, and both men benefitted from the other’s capabilities and courage. The general, to his credit, gave Gunn a free hand to develop the technology and tactics that turned the tide of the Pacific war.

    By Myron D. Stokes on Jan 1, 2009 at 9:13 am

  4. Loved the book by pappy blount,B25 pilot.
    With those 50 cal guns firing forward at 1500 yards the ships superstructure would melt.

    By humphrey on Jan 20, 2009 at 4:48 am

  5. Martin Caidin wrote an excellent “historical novel” about the Battle of the Bismarck Sea entitled “Whip”. I read it shortly after graduation from college in 1977. In 1998 I re-read it after reading an excellent historical account of the battle entitled “Battle of the Bismarck Sea” by Lex McAulay.

    By Kevin Maule on Mar 30, 2009 at 2:08 pm

  6. I was on the Battle of the Bismark Sea. Flew an A-20A as the pilot. Sank the Sea Truck Kembu Maru with two 500 pound 5 ssecon delay fused bombs in her stern. K was Wing man with Dixie Dunbar and his bombs skipped over the ship. My airplain was named “Kentucky Red” after my wife, Dottie from Louisville, KY. Our commander was Glen Clark leading a force of 12 A20s.

    JOHN F. TAYLOR, Colonel, USAF Retired: 9250 Yarrow St., Westminster, CO 80021

    By John F. Taylor on Apr 20, 2009 at 7:30 pm

  7. My brother, Walter Illsley, was the Bendix Aviation field technician who mounted their 50 caliber machine guns on the noses of those B-25s. He told us the whole story. I believe they were one plane short caused by some earlier non-combat pilot error.
    Earlier, while at the Bendix factory in South Bend learning armament, he went up, I believe to Wisconsin, and mounted the first gyro stabilized turrets in some B-25s, possibly Doolittle’s planes. After the Pacific he went to North Africa and Italy doing armament on B-25s. He just passed away this last March 24 at 90.
    Norman Illsley, Ft Collins, CO

    By Norman Illsley on Jul 12, 2009 at 6:24 pm

  8. Good man fighting for our freedom e ocidental way of life.
    I´m grateful and proud about them.
    I´m from Brazil, São Paulo, but I´ve read all about those men
    who fight for better world.
    God bless you!

    By Paulo on Oct 8, 2009 at 6:35 am

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles




SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these fields of endeavor have had the most impact on the course of human history?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help