| |

Battle of the Bismarck SeaBy Lawrence Spinetta | World War II | 7 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post The convoy departed Rabaul on January 5 and sailed the shortest route, south to Lae. It was halfway to its goal before it was first spotted by Allied air patrols the morning of January 6. From that point, Allied reconnaissance aircraft demonstrated remarkable persistence and tenacity. In total, thirty-seven separate missions monitored and tracked the convoy. Single planes used squall lines and clouds to conceal their presence and dodge enemy Ki-43 Oscar fighters. Some reconnaissance planes were jumped by as many as nine Oscars but managed to fight off their attackers and escape. Others shot down six enemy fighters and probably destroyed an additional four during these engagements. Subscribe Today
But efforts to attack the convoy, despite some remarkable individual feats of airmanship and courage, suffered from a piecemeal approach and disorganization at the top. Army Air Forces squadrons did not coordinate attacks; units were sent out as soon as aircraft were loaded with ordnance. Of the seven missions flown against the convoy on the first day, six were single-plane sorties. The seventh mission was a sixteen-plane formation of P-38s that engaged Japanese fighters covering the convoy. That night, an Australian Catalina, in a virtuoso piece of navigation, dropped flares at the estimated position of the convoy and then managed to score a direct hit that sank the freighter Nichiryu Maru. The next day, January 7, the Allies launched another series of ragged and uncoordinated attacks. In all, thirteen missions, of one to twenty planes each, went out. They were a hodgepodge of available aircraft, fighters and bombers: A-20, B-17, B-24, B-25, B-26, Beaufighter, P-38, P-40. Although 78 percent of the airplanes reached their primary targets, Allied air power sank only one transport and drove another, Myoko Maru, up on the beach where it was later destroyed. The majority of ships in the Japanese convoy made it to Lae and unloaded their cargo. Expressing frustration in his personal journal, General Kenney admitted that his units were, up to that point, “taking it on the chin.” Kenney had been a fighter pilot during World War I and had developed a reputation as a problem solver. He immediately set to work figuring out what went wrong. To improve bombing accuracy, Kenney advocated flying low-level attacks. But attacking ships at masthead height—which meant flying about fifty feet above the water—would require neutralizing shipborne antiaircraft artillery. For that task, Kenney turned to Maj. Paul “Pappy” Gunn, a colorful and innovative maintenance officer. Gunn was known for being, in the words of an admiring Bell Aircraft factory representative, “exacting in efficiency and ability” and “able to do things with aircraft which others would not attempt.” In the summer of 1942, Gunn had supervised a major modification of the A-20 in his experimental workshop at Eagle Farm airfield in Brisbane, Australia, that equipped the light bomber with nose guns for strafing. The A-20’s success undoubtedly stimulated Kenney’s interest in further developing tactics that emphasized low-level bombing and strafing attacks to overwhelm antiaircraft opposition. Kenney directed Gunn to transform a number of Fifth Air Force B-25s into so-called commerce destroyers. Gunn installed ten .50-caliber machine guns: four in the nose, two on each side, and two more in the top turret. The 81st Air Depot Group in Townsville, Australia, then swung into production. Making only minor modifications to Gunn’s plan, and putting in twelve- to eighteen-hour working days, it produced thirty B-25C-1s in the first three months of 1943. The B-25C-1 enjoyed a number of advantages over the modified A-20s—a longer range, a heavier bomb load, heavier firepower, and upper-turret protection. Additionally, the B-25C-1 carried a copilot and included instruments for flying in stormy weather or darkness—“extremely comforting factors for the flyers,” noted a Fifth Air Force report at the time. The B-25C-1 was, however, ten to twenty miles per hour slower than the A-20 and less maneuverable. The two thousand rounds of ammunition for the forward-firing guns made the aircraft nose-heavy, although pilots became accustomed to its unique flight characteristics after a few flights. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6Tags: 20th - 21st Century, Aerial Combat, Historical Conflicts, Naval Battles, World War II
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
7 Comments to “Battle of the Bismarck Sea”
does anyone happen to know if there is a picture of the 6816 ton Japanese merchantman Kembu Maru. Does one exist?
By mwolf on Aug 1, 2008 at 1:13 pm
As much as this analysis of the Battle of The Bismarck Sea is appreciated, it too often reaches the level of revisionist history as it relates to the actual architect and the structure of this stunning Allied victory.
As the well researched and documented book “Pappy Gunn”, penned by his son Nathaniel (http://www.historynet.com/pappy-gunn-book-review.htm#comment-4601) notes, this battle was well on its way to being a repeat of the previous attempt by Gen. Kenney to stop a similar base re-supply convoy earlier in the year. The attacks by the B-17s and B-25s bombing from high and medium altitudes were thwarted by weather and inaccuracy, and finally, frustrated with with the lack of results, Ed Larner’s strafing and skip bombing B-25s along with A-20s, were ordered into action AND NOT BY GEN. KENNEY. The book reveals details of precisely what happened at a critical and pivotal moment in this operation.
Kenney and Gunn, however, were an impressive duo, and both men benefitted from the other’s capabilities and courage. The general, to his credit, gave Gunn a free hand to develop the technology and tactics that turned the tide of the Pacific war.
By Myron D. Stokes on Jan 1, 2009 at 9:13 am
Loved the book by pappy blount,B25 pilot.
With those 50 cal guns firing forward at 1500 yards the ships superstructure would melt.
By humphrey on Jan 20, 2009 at 4:48 am
Martin Caidin wrote an excellent “historical novel” about the Battle of the Bismarck Sea entitled “Whip”. I read it shortly after graduation from college in 1977. In 1998 I re-read it after reading an excellent historical account of the battle entitled “Battle of the Bismarck Sea” by Lex McAulay.
By Kevin Maule on Mar 30, 2009 at 2:08 pm
I was on the Battle of the Bismark Sea. Flew an A-20A as the pilot. Sank the Sea Truck Kembu Maru with two 500 pound 5 ssecon delay fused bombs in her stern. K was Wing man with Dixie Dunbar and his bombs skipped over the ship. My airplain was named “Kentucky Red” after my wife, Dottie from Louisville, KY. Our commander was Glen Clark leading a force of 12 A20s.
JOHN F. TAYLOR, Colonel, USAF Retired: 9250 Yarrow St., Westminster, CO 80021
By John F. Taylor on Apr 20, 2009 at 7:30 pm
My brother, Walter Illsley, was the Bendix Aviation field technician who mounted their 50 caliber machine guns on the noses of those B-25s. He told us the whole story. I believe they were one plane short caused by some earlier non-combat pilot error.
Earlier, while at the Bendix factory in South Bend learning armament, he went up, I believe to Wisconsin, and mounted the first gyro stabilized turrets in some B-25s, possibly Doolittle’s planes. After the Pacific he went to North Africa and Italy doing armament on B-25s. He just passed away this last March 24 at 90.
Norman Illsley, Ft Collins, CO
By Norman Illsley on Jul 12, 2009 at 6:24 pm
Good man fighting for our freedom e ocidental way of life.
I´m grateful and proud about them.
I´m from Brazil, São Paulo, but I´ve read all about those men
who fight for better world.
God bless you!
By Paulo on Oct 8, 2009 at 6:35 am